A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk.

A dynamic deterministic biological model was developed that generates, for a given cow on a given day, a value for her risk of having mastitis. The model combines real-time information from a mastitis indicator measured in milk with additional factors that are other known risk factors of mastitis but that are not reflected in the indicator. l-Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), an enzyme whose activity is increased because of mastitis, is used as an example of a mastitis indicator. The additional factors incorporated in the model are days from calving, breed, parity, milk yield, udder characteristics, other disease records, electrical conductivity, and herd characteristics. The model is designed to run each time a new LDH value is recorded and can run in the absence of the additional factors. Electrical conductivity measurements and disease records, where available, also trigger the model to run. As an input, milk LDH activity values (micromol/min per L) are multiplied by milk yield (L) to produce the amount of LDH (micromol/min) and are then smoothed using an extended Kalman filter before being processed by the biological model. The output comprises a risk of acute mastitis and a relative degree of chronic mastitis. The model also produces a days-to-next sample value that allows sampling frequency to be either increased or reduced depending on the risk of mastitis. The days-to-next sample value was designed to make the best use of opportunities afforded by automated, inline sampling technology. The model functionality was investigated using simulated data, and real-farm data of naturally occurring mastitis were then used to validate the model. The results demonstrated that the model is robust to sampling frequency and random noise in the LDH measurements. It was able to detect mastitis reasonably well: Using a threshold mastitis risk of 0.7, sensitivity for detecting clinical mastitis was 82%. Specificity, that is, the ability to avoid misclassifying healthy observations as mastitis, was 99%.

[1]  T. Larsen,et al.  L-lactate dehydrogenase and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activities in bovine milk as indicators of non-specific mastitis , 2006, Journal of Dairy Research.

[2]  N. Friggens,et al.  A stochastic model simulating pathogen-specific mastitis control in a dairy herd. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  K. Ingvartsen,et al.  Predicting risk of ketosis in dairy cows using in-line measurements of beta-hydroxybutyrate: a biological model. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  Nicolas C Friggens,et al.  Prediction of the reproductive status of cattle on the basis of milk progesterone measures: model description. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[5]  T. Larsen Determination of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in milk by a fluorometric assay. , 2005, The Journal of dairy research.

[6]  H. Deluyker,et al.  Factors affecting cure and somatic cell count after pirlimycin treatment of subclinical mastitis in lactating cows. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Mastitis in dairy production. Current knowledge and future solutions , 2005 .

[8]  H. Hogeveen,et al.  Diagnosis of mastitis and indicators of milk quality. , 2005 .

[9]  Y. Schukken,et al.  Effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Electrical conductivity of milk: ability to predict mastitis status. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  On the relationship between lactational performance and health: is it yield or metabolic imbalance that cause production diseases in dairy cattle? A position paper , 2003 .

[12]  Christine Fourichon,et al.  Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[13]  J. Jensen,et al.  Potential for improving description of bovine udder health status by combined analysis of milk parameters. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  P. Fricke Scanning the future--ultrasonography as a reproductive management tool for dairy cattle. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  I. R. Korsgaard,et al.  An introduction to multiprocess class II mixture models. , 2002 .

[16]  T. Mottram,et al.  Automatic On-Line Analysis Of Milk Constituents (Urea, Ketones, Enzymes And Hormones) Using Biosensors , 2002, Comparative Clinical Pathology.

[17]  M. Lucy,et al.  Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  W Ouweltjes,et al.  Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system. , 2001, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[19]  R M de Mol,et al.  Application of fuzzy logic in automated cow status monitoring. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  L. Green,et al.  Risk factors associated with clinical mastitis in low somatic cell count British dairy herds. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  D. Barbano,et al.  Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  Roel F. Veerkamp,et al.  On the use of simple ratios between lactation curve coefficients to describe parity effects on milk production , 1999 .

[23]  G. H. Kroeze,et al.  Description of a detection model for oestrus and diseases in dairy cattle based on time series analysis combined with a Kalman filter , 1999 .

[24]  J. Hillerton Redefining mastitis based on somatic cell count , 1999 .

[25]  H. Henderson,et al.  Changes in electrical conductivity and somatic cell count between milk fractions from quarters subclinically infected with particular mastitis pathogens , 1998, Journal of Dairy Research.

[26]  A. Kruif,et al.  Influence of parity and stage of lactation on the somatic cell count in bacteriologically negative dairy cows. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  J. Hamann,et al.  Potential of specific milk composition variables for cow health management , 1997 .

[28]  J. A. Lines,et al.  A review of livestock monitoring and the need for integrated systems , 1997 .

[29]  C. H. Mckinnon,et al.  Patterns of intramammary infection and clinical mastitis over a 5 year period in a closely monitored herd applying mastitis control measures , 1995, Journal of Dairy Research.

[30]  R J Harmon,et al.  Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  N. Katoh,et al.  Contribution of leucocytes to the origin of lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in milk of bovine mastitis. , 1989, Nihon juigaku zasshi. The Japanese journal of veterinary science.

[32]  R. Huggett Mathematical models in agriculture: France, J. and Thornley, J.H.M. London: Butterworths, 1984. 335 pp. £35 hardback , 1985 .

[33]  F. H. Dodd,et al.  Reviews of the progress of Dairy Science: Mastitis control – progress and prospects , 1984, Journal of Dairy Research.

[34]  A F Smith,et al.  Monitoring renal transplants: an application of the multiprocess Kalman filter. , 1983, Biometrics.

[35]  B. Kitchen,et al.  Mastitis diagnostic tests to estimate mammary gland epithelial cell damage. , 1980, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  A. Saran,et al.  Distribution of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in normal and inflamed bovine udders and milk. , 1977, Research in veterinary science.

[37]  G. Ziv,et al.  Enzyme activities in normal and inflamed bovine udder tissues. , 2010, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.

[38]  F. H. Dodd,et al.  415. Factors affecting the rate of machine milking , 1950, Journal of Dairy Research.