An alpha-helical lid guides the target DNA toward catalysis in CRISPR-Cas12a

CRISPR-Cas12a is a powerful RNA-guided genome-editing system that generates double-strand DNA breaks using its single RuvC nuclease domain by a sequential mechanism in which initial cleavage of the non-target strand is followed by target strand cleavage. How the spatially distant DNA target strand traverses toward the RuvC catalytic core is presently not understood. Here, continuous tens of microsecond-long molecular dynamics and free-energy simulations reveal that an α-helical lid, located within the RuvC domain, plays a pivotal role in the traversal of the DNA target strand by anchoring the crRNA:target strand duplex and guiding the target strand toward the RuvC core, as also corroborated by DNA cleavage experiments. In this mechanism, the REC2 domain pushes the crRNA:target strand duplex toward the core of the enzyme, while the Nuc domain aids the bending and accommodation of the target strand within the RuvC core by bending inward. Understanding of this critical process underlying Cas12a activity will enrich fundamental knowledge and facilitate further engineering strategies for genome editing. CRISPR-Cas12a is a powerful RNA-guided genome-editing system. Saha et al. show that an alpha-helical lid plays the central role in guiding the target DNA toward the single RuvC nuclease domain, resulting in a double-stranded DNA break.

[1]  Chase L. Beisel,et al.  RNA targeting unleashes indiscriminate nuclease activity of CRISPR–Cas12a2 , 2023, Nature.

[2]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Use of multistate Bennett acceptance ratio method for free-energy calculations from enhanced sampling and free-energy perturbation , 2022, Biophysical Reviews.

[3]  M. Jinek,et al.  Principles of target DNA cleavage and the role of Mg2+ in the catalysis of CRISPR–Cas9 , 2022, Nature Catalysis.

[4]  M. Szczelkun,et al.  CRISPR–Cas12a-mediated DNA clamping triggers target-strand cleavage , 2022, Nature Chemical Biology.

[5]  F. Ricci,et al.  Enhancement of CRISPR/Cas12a trans-cleavage activity using hairpin DNA reporters , 2022, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Chase L. Beisel,et al.  Large-scale structural rearrangements unleash indiscriminate nuclease activity of CRISPR-Cas12a2 , 2022, bioRxiv.

[7]  P. Arantes,et al.  Dynamics and mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas9 through the lens of computational methods. , 2022, Current opinion in structural biology.

[8]  J. Doudna,et al.  Structural biology of CRISPR–Cas immunity and genome editing enzymes , 2022, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[9]  Dina Grohmann,et al.  Allosteric activation of CRISPR-Cas12a requires the concerted movement of the bridge helix and helix 1 of the RuvC II domain , 2022, bioRxiv.

[10]  David W. Taylor,et al.  Structural basis for mismatch surveillance by CRISPR–Cas9 , 2022, Nature.

[11]  D. Rueda,et al.  Cas12a target search and cleavage on force-stretched DNA , 2021, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[12]  Dina Grohmann,et al.  Decoupling the bridge helix of Cas12a results in a reduced trimming activity, increased mismatch sensitivity and impaired conformational transitions , 2021, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  L. Casalino,et al.  Catalytic Mechanism of Non-Target DNA Cleavage in CRISPR-Cas9 Revealed by Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics. , 2020, ACS catalysis.

[14]  Yanli Wang,et al.  Structural basis for two metal-ion catalysis of DNA cleavage by Cas12i2 , 2020, Nature Communications.

[15]  Pengfei Li,et al.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[16]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  CRISPR-CasΦ from huge phages is a hypercompact genome editor , 2020, Science.

[17]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Improved Alchemical Free Energy Calculations with Optimized Smoothstep Softcore Potentials. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[18]  Guixia Yu,et al.  CRISPR-Cas12–based detection of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  J. Doudna,et al.  CRISPR-Cas12a exploits R-loop asymmetry to form double-strand breaks , 2020, bioRxiv.

[20]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  THE PROMISE AND CHALLENGE OF THERAPEUTIC GENOME EDITING , 2020, Nature.

[21]  He Huang,et al.  ff19SB: Amino-acid specific protein backbone parameters trained against quantum mechanics energy surfaces in solution. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  Paula M. Rice,et al.  Modeller , 2019 .

[23]  D. C. Swarts,et al.  Mechanistic Insights into the cis- and trans-Acting DNase Activities of Cas12a. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[24]  S. Stella,et al.  Conformational Activation Promotes CRISPR-Cas12a Catalysis and Resetting of the Endonuclease Activity , 2018, Cell.

[25]  Clarisse G. Ricci,et al.  Key role of the REC lobe during CRISPR–Cas9 activation by ‘sensing’, ‘regulating’, and ‘locking’ the catalytic HNH domain , 2018, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[26]  In‐San Kim,et al.  Direct observation of DNA target searching and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas12a , 2018, Nature Communications.

[27]  James R. Rybarski,et al.  Kinetic basis for DNA target specificity of CRISPR-Cas12a , 2018, bioRxiv.

[28]  Torsten Schwede,et al.  SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  Scott Bailey,et al.  Real-time observation of DNA target interrogation and product release by the RNA-guided endonuclease CRISPR Cpf1 (Cas12a) , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity , 2018, Science.

[31]  S. Stella,et al.  Structure of the Cpf1 endonuclease R-loop complex after target DNA cleavage , 2017, Nature.

[32]  D. C. Swarts,et al.  Structural Basis for Guide RNA Processing and Seed-Dependent DNA Targeting by CRISPR-Cas12a. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[33]  D. Patel,et al.  PAM-Dependent Target DNA Recognition and Cleavage by C2c1 CRISPR-Cas Endonuclease , 2016, Cell.

[34]  D. Patel,et al.  Type V CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 endonuclease employs a unique mechanism for crRNA-mediated target DNA recognition , 2016, Cell Research.

[35]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Ningning Li,et al.  The crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with CRISPR RNA , 2016, Nature.

[37]  J. Mendieta,et al.  MEPSA: minimum energy pathway analysis for energy landscapes , 2015, Bioinform..

[38]  D. Case,et al.  PARMBSC1: A REFINED FORCE-FIELD FOR DNA SIMULATIONS , 2015, Nature Methods.

[39]  A. Regev,et al.  Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System , 2015, Cell.

[40]  David L. Mobley,et al.  Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations , 2015, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[41]  J. P. Grossman,et al.  Anton 2: Raising the Bar for Performance and Programmability in a Special-Purpose Molecular Dynamics Supercomputer , 2014, SC14: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[42]  Wouter G. Touw,et al.  A series of PDB-related databanks for everyday needs , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  Marco Biasini,et al.  SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  J. Doudna,et al.  Structures of Cas9 Endonucleases Reveal RNA-Mediated Conformational Activation , 2014, Science.

[45]  Kenneth M. Mackenzie,et al.  Accurate and efficient integration for molecular dynamics simulations at constant temperature and pressure. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[46]  Pengfei Li,et al.  Rational Design of Particle Mesh Ewald Compatible Lennard-Jones Parameters for +2 Metal Cations in Explicit Solvent. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[47]  Andrea Amadei,et al.  Essential dynamics: foundation and applications , 2012 .

[48]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[49]  J. Kästner Umbrella sampling , 2011 .

[50]  J. Šponer,et al.  Refinement of the Cornell et al. Nucleic Acids Force Field Based on Reference Quantum Chemical Calculations of Glycosidic Torsion Profiles , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[51]  Bert L. de Groot,et al.  g_wham—A Free Weighted Histogram Analysis Implementation Including Robust Error and Autocorrelation Estimates , 2010 .

[52]  Michal Otyepka,et al.  Performance of Molecular Mechanics Force Fields for RNA Simulations: Stability of UUCG and GNRA Hairpins. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[53]  Wei Yang,et al.  Nucleases: diversity of structure, function and mechanism , 2010, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[54]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[55]  R. Dror,et al.  Gaussian split Ewald: A fast Ewald mesh method for molecular simulation. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[56]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[57]  M. Klein,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms , 1994 .

[58]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[59]  Mark E. Tuckerman,et al.  Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics , 1992 .

[60]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[61]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[62]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[63]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[64]  Harold L. Friedman,et al.  Brownian dynamics: Its application to ionic solutions , 1977 .

[65]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[66]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, Nucleic Acids Research.

[67]  P. Arantes,et al.  Supporting Information Molecular Dynamics Reveals a DNA-Induced Dynamic Switch Triggering Activation of CRISPR-Cas12a , 2020 .

[68]  D. C. Swarts,et al.  Preparation and electroporation of Cas12a/Cpf1-guide RNA complexes for introducing large gene deletions in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2019, Methods in enzymology.

[69]  F. Zhang,et al.  Development of CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing and beyond , 2019, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[70]  Daniel Svozil,et al.  Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: improving the description of alpha/gamma conformers. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[71]  S. Nosé,et al.  An extension of the canonical ensemble molecular dynamics method , 1986 .