Doll Based Design Tool in Corporate Contexts: A Qualitative Comparison with Storyboard in a New Product Development Project

Various tools for participatory design approach have been developed to support users to engage design process. Doll scenario is proposed as a generative tool for letting participants make and enact scenarios. However, suitable context to practice doll scenario is unclear in comparison with other tools using scenario. Therefore, our overall objective is to increase understanding of characteristics of making scenario in two different ways of expression; with doll and storyboard. We developed a doll scenario method, doll staging. The tool was evaluated in comparison to storyboard at a workshop which is a part of a new product development project in a corporate. The workshop was evaluated by semi-structured interviews with the participants and observations of the workshop and design outcome. The result suggests that doll staging allows participants to think from users? perspective in developing new idea. These findings provides new direction to choose scenario based design tools according to objective or context of design project. We also discuss potentials and research directions to use tools for developing scenario in corporate contexts.

[1]  Bella Martin,et al.  Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions , 2012 .

[2]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Contextmapping: experiences from practice , 2005 .

[3]  J. Halse,et al.  Rehearsing the Future , 2010 .

[4]  Okholm Hansen,et al.  Designing an interactive installation with sounds from rural areas - Explorations of the interactivity with sounds , 2017 .

[5]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design , 2010, PDC '10.

[6]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Storyboarding: an empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines , 2006, DIS '06.

[7]  R. Verganti,et al.  Exploring storyboarding in pre-brief activities , 2013 .

[8]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  Idea generation: customer co‐creation versus traditional market research techniques , 2011 .

[9]  J.M. Carrol,et al.  Five reasons for scenario-based design , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[10]  Takehiko Ohno,et al.  Towards a Culturally Independent Participatory Design Method: Fusing Game Elements into the Design Process , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Culture and Computing.

[11]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design , 2012 .

[12]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[13]  Eva Brandt,et al.  Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design , 2000 .

[14]  Corrie van der Lelie,et al.  The value of storyboards in the product design process , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.