Design considerations and life prediction of metal-on-metal bearings: the effect of clearance.

BACKGROUND Clinical observations suggest that metal-on-metal arthroplasties that have been implanted for more than twenty years do fail. It is proposed that there are not two, but three distinct phases of wear life for any metal-on-metal implant system: bedding-in, steady state, and end point. In this study, we asked two questions: can we explain late failure due to wear, and will there be a late failure mechanism due to a change in the frictional torque? METHODS In order to characterize wear failure, an analysis was made of five retrieved metal-on-metal couples that were mapped with use of a roundness machine. A geometrical model was developed on the basis of these observations, and wear at the end point was calculated. The literature on first-generation metal-on-metal implants retrieved for aseptic loosening was reviewed to assess the agreement with the retrieval findings as well as the wear model. RESULTS A wear patch of an appreciable and constant size could be measured in all five retrieved couples. The end point of revision was observed to occur when the wear progression reached a contact area corresponding to approximately 75% of the projected diameter of the ball. The wear volume was calculated from the geometry. The available literature describing the wear characteristics of retrieved bearings after successful clinical use showed good agreement with the calculated wear model. CONCLUSIONS During the implant life of long-term successful metal-on-metal devices, a wear patch develops, as evident from retrieved failed devices. Failure often occurs through loosening, and the observed wear patch is similar in size for devices measured by us and for those described in the literature. We hypothesized that failure by loosening occurs through the accumulation of wear, which eventually leads to high friction within the bearing and increased torsional forces across the joint and its fixation.

[1]  R. Streicher,et al.  [The wear behavior of capsules and heads of CoCrMo casts in long-term implanted all-metal hip prostheses]. , 1989, Der Orthopade.

[2]  P. Pynsent,et al.  Blood and urine metal ion levels in young and active patients after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: four-year results of a prospective longitudinal study. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  C. Engh,et al.  Surgical management of polyethylene wear and pelvic osteolysis with modular uncemented acetabular components. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  M. Kothari,et al.  Surface Geometry of Retrieved McKee-Farrar Total Hip Replacements , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Weber Bg,et al.  Total Hip Joint Replacement Using a CoCrMo Metal-Metal-Sliding Pairing. , 1993 .

[6]  A Yew,et al.  Analysis of contact mechanics in McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal hip implants , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  F. Chan,et al.  Comparison of Alloys and Designs in a Hip Simulator Study of Metal on Metal Implants , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  A. Unsworth,et al.  Comparison of friction and lubrication of different hip prostheses , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[9]  A. Unsworth,et al.  The effect of ‘running-in’ on the tribology and surface morphology of metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing device in simulator studies , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  A. Unsworth,et al.  The wear of metal-on-metal total hip prostheses measured in a hip simulator , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  D. Howie,et al.  The long-term wear of retrieved McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal total hip prostheses. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  D Dowson,et al.  A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[14]  D. Dowson,et al.  The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  J. Fisher,et al.  Changes in the contact area during the bedding-in wear of different sizes of metal on metal hip prostheses. , 2004, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[16]  T Khan,et al.  Metal ion levels after metal-on-metal Ring total hip replacement: a 30-year follow-up study. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  H. Weber,et al.  Cobalt Chromium Molybdenum Metal Combination for Modular Hip Prostheses , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Engineering issues and wear performance of metal on metal hip implants. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity? , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  J Fisher,et al.  Quantitative analysis of wear and wear debris from metal-on-metal hip prostheses tested in a physiological hip joint simulator. , 2001, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[21]  W. Harris,et al.  Long-duration metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  P S Walker,et al.  The tribology (friction, lubrication and wear) of all-metal artificial hip joints. 1971. , 1971, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  R. Meneghini,et al.  Epinephrine-induced pulmonary edema during arthroscopic knee surgery. A case report. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  Mauricio Silva,et al.  Average patient walking activity approaches 2 million cycles per year: pedometers under-record walking activity. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  R. Chiesa,et al.  In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  R. Villar,et al.  Levels of metal ions after small- and large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  Duncan Dowson,et al.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: design. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  P. Campbell,et al.  Metal on metal total hip replacement workshop consensus document. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  T. Schmalzried,et al.  Progressive bilateral pelvic osteolysis in a patient with McKee-Farrar metal-metal total hip prostheses. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[30]  Z. Jin,et al.  Contact mechanics analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[31]  C. Rieker,et al.  In vivo tribological performance of 231 metal-on-metal hip articulations. , 2002, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[32]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  I. Clarke,et al.  The wear pattern in metal-on-metal hip prostheses. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[34]  A Stark,et al.  Ultra-low wear rates for rigid-on-rigid bearings in total hip replacements , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[35]  P. Pynsent,et al.  The McKee-Farrar hip arthroplasty. A long-term study. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.