A failure-inducement model of research and development expenditure: Italian evidence from the early 1980s

Abstract Empirical evidence for the Schumpeterian suggestion of a positive relationship between profitability and innovative effort is slim. In fact, the opposite is often suggested. An alternative ‘failure-inducement’ hypothesis, argues that firms make innovative efforts when performance falls below a minimum threshold, resulting in a negative relationship between profitability and R&D expenditures. Data on R&D expenditures in Italian industry in the early 1980s- a period of severe economic crisis - show that both hypotheses are relevant for firms whose profits are well above or well below average, respectively.

[1]  M. Kamien,et al.  Market structure and innovation , 1982 .

[2]  Dennis C. Mueller,et al.  The Firm Decision Process: An Econometric Investigation , 1967 .

[3]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[4]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A New View of Technological Change , 1969 .

[5]  J. Walter Elliott,et al.  Funds Flow vs. Expectational Theories of Research and Development Expenditures in the Firm , 1971 .

[6]  Innovation in the Machine Tool Industry , 1957 .

[7]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives , 1986 .

[8]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Bengt Johannisson,et al.  FIRM SIZE AND INVENTIVE ACTIVITY , 1971 .

[10]  Richard H. Day,et al.  Adaptive Economic Models , 1978 .

[11]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Patents, Priority and Imitation or, the Economics of Races and Waiting Games , 1988 .

[12]  D. Needham Market Structure and Firms' R & D Behavior , 1975 .

[13]  J. D. Howe,et al.  The Determinants of R & D Expenditures , 1976 .

[14]  D. Hamberg,et al.  R & D : essays on the economics of research and development , 1966 .

[15]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[16]  David M. Levy,et al.  Effects of government R&D on private R&D investment and productivity: a macroeconomic analysis , 1983 .

[17]  Ben S. Branch Research and Development Activity and Profitability: A Distributed Lag Analysis , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations , 1978 .

[19]  J. M. Samuels,et al.  Patents, profitability, liquidity and firm size , 1972 .

[20]  The Sources of Invention. , 1958 .

[21]  P. David,et al.  Technical choice innovation and economic growth , 1975 .

[22]  R. Wilson,et al.  The Effect of Technological Environment and Product Rivalry on R&D Effort and Licensing of Inventions , 1977 .

[23]  Jacques Cremer,et al.  Une analyse économétrique de l'effort de recherche et développement de l'industrie française , 1978 .

[24]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Induced Innovation: Technology, Institutions, and Development , 1978 .

[25]  Derek L. Bosworth,et al.  The influence of demand and supply side pressures on the quantity and quality of inventive activity , 1984 .

[26]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason , 1997 .

[27]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Firm Size and R&D Intensity: a Re-Examination , 1987 .

[28]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[29]  M. Jones-Lee,et al.  Beyond Economic Man. , 1977 .

[30]  John T. Scott,et al.  Competition in an Open Economy: A Model Applied to Canada , 1980 .

[31]  F. Lichtenberg The Relationship between Federal Contract R&D and Company R&D , 1984 .

[32]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[33]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  The effects of R&D tax credits and allowances in Canada , 1985 .

[34]  Morton I. Kamien,et al.  Self-Financing of an R & D Project , 1976 .