A Robot-Partner for Preschool Children Learning English Using Socio-Cognitive Conflict

Introduction This research project deals with a robot (MecWilly) designed to help preschool children (4-6 years) in their learning of a second language (English). The main innovation is the experimental setting chosen in order to obtain an improvement in the children's English language skills. In previous studies of educational contexts, robots have typically been used as "teachers" to "structure" the learning process (Fridin, 2014). This also means that children viewed the robot-teacher as "other" (in the case of humanoid robots) or as an "artifact" like a computer or a book (in the case of robots with non-human features). The link between Robotics and Psychology has presented a very interesting challenge for many scholars over the last fifty years (Kelley & Cassenti, 2011). Starting from the development of the first types of computer (the first Turingcomplete machine, ENIAC, created by John Von Neumann in the middle of the 20th century), the simulation of human mental processes, and, later, of human decisions and actions, has lead robotics to become one of the most exciting fields for the evolution of human behavioral models. Throughout this process, many of the most important models and theories of Psychology have been examined, in particular Piaget's Constructivism and the related processes of assimilation and accommodation, Skinner's operant conditioning, the Vygotskian Zone of Proximal Development, Cognitivism's Human-Information Processing (HIP) model, as well as the latest models of artificial intelligence, Connectionism and Neural Networks (Dautenhahn & Billard, 1999a; 1999b; Ziemke, 2001). Even though all these models have been looked at as part of the broad field of Human-Robot Interactions (HRI) or in Robot Development/Evolution, each model has also been analyzed in more specific and well-defined scopes of application. We can briefly summarize five areas of application for psychological models in robotics: (a) The evolution of robot prototypes which simulate human mental and physical behavior; (b) Robot-robot interaction in complex environments for simulating human social behavior; (c) Human[right arrow]robot and robots[right arrow]robot interaction in which the human or one of the robots acts as the tutor|teacher|expert and the (other) robot is a learner; (d) Human[left arrow]robot interaction in which the robot acts as a mechanical "partner" which allows the human to try out (and/or train) certain abilities or social skills so that he/she may make progress; (e) And finally a situation in which the human-robot interaction is characterized by a human who acts as a "tutor|teacher" for the robot and a robot acting as a counterpart in the learning process which, in the end, sees the convergence of improvement and knowledge acquisition influencing the human's cognitive development. The first two areas have been principally influenced by Skinner's Operant Conditioning, Cognitivism, and more recently by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Connectionism and neural networks (including their recent evolutions). Behaviorism played an important role in the development of early robots, as this psychological model has simple rules which can be easily fed into a machine. Thanks to these characteristics, Skinner's teaching machines were very successful in learning environments and demonstrated the importance of feedback (reinforcement) and also of coherence and repeated reinforcement over time in maximizing the learning process. Applying behavioral rules to robotics (and informatics), i.e., determining the behavior of a machine on the basis of the effects of a particular type of behavior and its related reinforcement, helped to produce a set of "mechanical" machines that were able to react to their environment by simulating certain types of human behavior. Robots capable of more sophisticated actions (and quasi-decisions) have been developed using behavioral models derived from AI connected to Behaviorism, the socalled Behavior-Based Robotics (Arkin, 1998; Brooks, 1986a). …

[1]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  A Robust Layered Control Syste For A Mobile Robot , 2022 .

[2]  Jeonghye Han,et al.  EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ROBOT ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING , 2012 .

[3]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  Felice Carugati,et al.  The multiple sides of the same tool: Cognitive development as a matter of social constructions and meanings , 1993 .

[5]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The construction of reality , 1986 .

[6]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  An Behavior-based Robotics , 1998 .

[7]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Teaching robots by moulding behavior and scaffolding the environment , 2006, HRI '06.

[8]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Issues of Robot-Human Interaction Dynamics in the Rehabilitation of Children with Autism , 2000 .

[9]  M. Moro,et al.  Robotics & Constructivism in Education : the TERECoP project , 2007 .

[10]  Suleman Shahid,et al.  Robot Assisted Language Learning through Games: A Comparison of Two Case Studies , 2013, Aust. J. Intell. Inf. Process. Syst..

[11]  Elvis Mazzoni,et al.  Monitoring Activity in E-Learning: A Quantitative Model Based on Web Tracking and Social Network Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference, and defiance , 2010 .

[13]  Aude Billard,et al.  Studying robot social cognition within a developmental psychology framework , 1999, 1999 Third European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots (Eurobot'99). Proceedings (Cat. No.99EX355).

[14]  Yuan-Chen Liu,et al.  Construction of an online learning system for decimal numbers through the use of cognitive conflict strategy , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[15]  G. Mugny,et al.  Learning from Conflict , 2012 .

[16]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Achieving Artificial Intelligence through Building Robots , 1986 .

[17]  W. Doise,et al.  Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations , 1975 .

[18]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[19]  Vito Trianni,et al.  Evolutionary Swarm Robotics - Evolving Self-Organising Behaviours in Groups of Autonomous Robots , 2008, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[20]  Marina Fridin,et al.  Storytelling by a kindergarten social assistive robot: A tool for constructive learning in preschool education , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Jyh-Shing Roger Jang,et al.  Using Tangible Companions for Enhancing Learning English Conversation , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[22]  U. Goswami,et al.  The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development , 2010 .

[23]  A. Billard,et al.  Chapter 18 Games Children with Autism Can Play With Robota , a Humanoid Robotic Doll , 1995 .

[24]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[25]  K. H. Stauder,et al.  Psychology of the Child , 1959 .

[26]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Development of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 2010 .

[27]  Bernd Weissmuller,et al.  Flesh And Machines How Robots Will Change Us , 2016 .

[28]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[29]  Elvis Mazzoni,et al.  The Cliques Participation Index (CPI) as an Indicator of Creativity in Online Collaborative Groups , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.

[30]  Sungjin Lee,et al.  On the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Language Learning , 2011, ReCALL.

[31]  Chih-Wei Chang,et al.  A Robot as a Teaching Assistant in an English Class , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).

[32]  E. Glasersfeld Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. , 1995 .

[33]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Self-Imitation and Environmental Scaffolding for Robot Teaching , 2007 .

[35]  T. Ziemke The Construction of ‘Reality’ in the Robot: Constructivist Perspectives on Situated Artificial Intelligence and Adaptive Robotics , 2001 .

[36]  W. Doise,et al.  Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances , 1978 .

[37]  Sara H. Basson,et al.  Universal Access and Assistive Technology , 2002 .

[38]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Life, Mind, and Robots: The Ins and Outs of Embodied Cognition , 1998, Hybrid Neural Systems.

[39]  W. Doise The social development of the intellect , 1984 .

[40]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Socio-cognitive conflict and learning: past and present , 2010, ICLS.

[41]  B. Nardi Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition , 1995 .

[42]  Daniel N. Cassenti,et al.  Theoretical explorations of cognitive robotics using developmental psychology , 2011 .

[43]  Po-Yao Chao,et al.  Exploring the Possibility of Using Humanoid Robots as Instructional Tools for Teaching a Second Language in Primary School , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[44]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[45]  A. Billard,et al.  Effects of repeated exposure to a humanoid robot on children with autism , 2004 .

[46]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals: Behavioural, Social and Communicative Dimensions , 2009 .

[47]  Aude Billard,et al.  Bringing up robots or—the psychology of socially intelligent robots: from theory to implementation , 1999, AGENTS '99.