The Effect of Solvent based Nanofluid Flooding on Heavy Oil Recovery

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of solvent based nanofluid flooding followed by waterflooding on heavy oil recovery performance and sweep efficiency improvement in unconsolidated oil-wet porous media. The sweep efficiency improvement is correlated with in-situ emulsion generation during such displacement and is monitored with a CT scanner. Partially hydrophobic silica NPs with proper interface affinity was firstly synthesized, and subsequently dispersed in toluene along with a surfactant to prepare the solvent based nanofluid. The solvent based nanofluid was then injected into an oil saturated sandpack at different slug sizes and further chased by brine to investigate the sweep efficiency improvement through possible emulsification. To investigate the beneficial effect of NPs, the aforementioned flooding was compared against conventional solvent flooding followed by waterflooding. The displacement patterns were monitored with a CT-scanner to assess the heavy oil recovery performance in the absence or presence of the solvent based nanofluid. The fluid density profiles during solvent based NF flooding followed by waterflooding were extracted from CT-scan images and compared against conventional solvent flooding followed by waterflooding to assess potential sweep efficiency improvement. The results revealed an increase in sweep efficiency during solvent based NF flooding followed by waterflooding. This was related to the creation of in-situ emulsion at the water-diluted oil interface due to the presence of NPs and surfactant in diluted oil. Unlike conventional solvent flooding where post water created several fingers through porous media, the water phase in solvent based nanofluid flooding was able to displace all the lower resistance paths created by the solvent based nanofluid. Moreover, chase water was able to recover almost all of the solvent in solvent based NF flooding, which is essential for the process to be economically viable. In general, the presence of solvent based NF was found to be effective in re- distributing the preferential water flow paths in to a more uniform front, which suppressed the fingering in turn and resulted in later water breakthrough, better sweep efficiency, and higher oil recovery. The proposed solvent based nanofluid flooding has not been tested so far as a heavy oil recovery technique. Unlike conventional solvent flooding which can suffer from high residual solvent to waterflooding, this technique revealed negligible residual solvent upon waterflooding. Moreover, it was found to be effective in sweep efficiency improvement and heavy oil recovery compared to conventional solvent flooding.

[1]  S. Bryant,et al.  The effect of water alternating solvent based nanofluid flooding on heavy oil recovery in oil-wet porous media , 2020 .

[2]  S. Bryant,et al.  Investigating sweep efficiency improvement in oil-wet porous media by the application of functionalized nanoparticles , 2020 .

[3]  S. Bryant,et al.  The effect of silanization assisted nanoparticle hydrophobicity on emulsion stability through droplet size distribution analysis , 2019, Chemical Engineering Science.

[4]  Kewei Zhang,et al.  A comparison study between N-Solv method and cyclic hot solvent injection (CHSI) method , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[5]  T. Babadagli,et al.  Can water-alternating-solvent injection be an option for efficient heavy-oil recovery?: An experimental analysis for different reservoir conditions , 2018, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[6]  M. Cao,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of solvent optimization during horizontal-well solvent-enhanced steam flooding in thin heavy-oil reservoirs , 2018, Fuel.

[7]  T. Babadagli,et al.  Efficiency of heavy-oil/bitumen recovery from fractured carbonates by hot-solvent injection , 2018, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[8]  T. Babadagli,et al.  Retrieval of solvent injected during heavy-oil recovery: Pore scale micromodel experiments at variable temperature conditions , 2017 .

[9]  J. Abedi,et al.  Semianalytical Modeling of Steam/Solvent Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil and Bitumen: Unsteady-State Model With Curved Interface , 2017 .

[10]  A. Shokri,et al.  Laboratory Measurements and Numerical Simulation of Cyclic Solvent Stimulation with a Thermally Aided Solvent Retrieval Phase in the Presence of Wormholes after Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand , 2016 .

[11]  A. Shokri,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis of Cyclic Solvent Stimulation for Post-CHOPS EOR: Application on an Actual Field Case , 2016 .

[12]  Tayfun Babadagli,et al.  Field scale modeling of CHOPS and solvent/thermal based post CHOPS EOR applications considering non-equilibrium foamy oil behavior and realistic representation of wormholes , 2016 .

[13]  Roy Mingway Wung Utilizing surface treated nanoparticles for enhanced geologic carbon sequestration , 2015 .

[14]  T. Babadagli,et al.  Effect of waterflooding history on the efficiency of fully miscible tertiary solvent injection and optimal design of water-alternating-gas process , 2015 .

[15]  Y. Al-Wahaibi,et al.  The novel use of Deep Eutectic Solvents for enhancing heavy oil recovery , 2014 .

[16]  D. H. Chung Transport of nanoparticles during drainage and imbibition displacements in porous media , 2013 .

[17]  T. Babadagli,et al.  Heavy oil and bitumen recovery by hot solvent injection , 2011 .

[18]  D. Rashtchian,et al.  Pore-Level Investigation of Heavy Oil Recovery During Water Alternating Solvent Injection Process , 2010 .

[19]  Xuebing Fu Enhanced Oil Recovery of Viscous Oil by Injection of Water-in-Oil Emulsion Made with Used Engine Oil , 2010 .

[20]  T. Frauenfeld,et al.  Numerical Simulation and Economic Evaluation of Hybrid Solvent Processes , 2009 .

[21]  G. Heck,et al.  Investigation of Low Pressure ES-SAGD , 2008 .

[22]  D. Law,et al.  Simulating the ES-SAGD Process With Solvent Mixture in Athabasca Reservoirs , 2008 .

[23]  T. N. Nasr,et al.  Thermal Techniques for the Recovery of Heavy Oil and Bitumen , 2005 .

[24]  H. Golbeck,et al.  Steam Alternating Solvent Process: Lab Test and Simulation , 2004 .

[25]  G. Beaulieu,et al.  Novel Expanding Solvent-SAGD Process "ES-SAGD" , 2003 .

[26]  H. Sarma,et al.  Evaluation of Emulsified Solvent Flooding For Heavy Oil Recovery , 1998 .

[27]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Interaction of Viscous Fingering, Permeability Heterogeneity, and Gravity Segregation in Three Dimensions , 1994 .

[28]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  Recovery of heavy oils using vapourized hydrocarbon solvents: further development of the Vapex process , 1993 .

[29]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  A New Process (VAPEX) For Recovering Heavy Oils Using Hot Water And Hydrocarbon Vapour , 1991 .

[30]  W. Shu,et al.  Effect of Solvent on Steam Recovery of Heavy Oil , 1988 .

[31]  Christie,et al.  Detailed Simulation of Unstable Processes in Miscible Flooding , 1987 .

[32]  Kamal N. Jha,et al.  A Laboratory Study Of Heavy Oil Recovery With Carbon Dioxide , 1986 .

[33]  L. E. Baker,et al.  Effects of Dispersion and Dead-End Pore Volume in Miscible Flooding , 1977 .

[34]  S. M. Ali,et al.  Bitumen Recovery From Oil Sands, Using Solvents In Conjunction With Steam , 1976 .