Feedback on second language students' writing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dana Ferris,et al. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction , 2006 .
[2] Ken Hyland,et al. Interpersonal aspects of response: constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. , 2006 .
[3] Masuhiro Kogoma. 総論;総論;Introduction , 2006 .
[4] C. Tardy. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Appropriation, ownership, and agency: Negotiating teacher feedback in academic settings , 2006 .
[5] Gayle L. Nelson,et al. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Cultural issues in peer response: Revisiting “culture” , 2006 .
[6] Caroline Coffin,et al. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Formative interaction in electronic written exchanges: Fostering feedback dialogue , 2006 .
[7] Liz Hamp-Lyons. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Feedback in portfolio-based writing courses , 2006 .
[8] John Milton,et al. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Resource-rich Web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers , 2006 .
[9] Hui-Tzu Min,et al. Training students to become successful peer reviewers , 2005 .
[10] J. Milton,et al. From Parrots to Puppet masters: fostering creative and authentic language use with online tools , 2005 .
[11] Lynn M. Goldstein. Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms , 2005 .
[12] Marie-Noëlle Lamy,et al. ’Reflective conversation’ in the virtual language classroom , 2005 .
[13] Icy Lee,et al. Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong , 2004 .
[14] J. Truscott. EVIDENCE AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTION: A RESPONSE TO CHANDLER , 2004 .
[15] Jessica Williams,et al. The writing center and second language writers , 2004 .
[16] Jessica Williams,et al. Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center , 2004 .
[17] Sara Cushing Weigle,et al. Novice Tutors and Their ESL Tutees: Three Case Studies of Tutor Roles and Perceptions of Tutorial Success. , 2004 .
[18] Tom Cobb,et al. Can Learners Use Concordance Feedback for Writing Errors , 2004 .
[19] Terese Thonus,et al. What are the differences? Tutor interactions with first- and second-language writers , 2004 .
[20] Martin Chodorow,et al. Automated Essay Evaluation: The Criterion Online Writing Service , 2004, AI Mag..
[21] Frank Tuzi,et al. The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course , 2004 .
[22] Lynn M. Goldstein. Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together , 2004 .
[23] Wei Zhu,et al. Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines☆ , 2004 .
[24] D. Ferris. The ‘‘Grammar Correction’ ’ Debate in L2 Writing: , 2022 .
[25] Paige Ware,et al. Confidence and competition online: ESL student perspectives on web-based discussions in the classroom , 2004 .
[26] Ken Hyland,et al. Second Language Writing , 2003 .
[27] Fiona Hyland,et al. Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback , 2003 .
[28] Yi Yuan,et al. The use of chat rooms in an ESL setting , 2003 .
[29] R. O’Dowd. UNDERSTANDING THE "OTHER SIDE": INTERCULTURAL LEARNING IN A SPANISH-ENGLISH E-MAIL EXCHANGE , 2003 .
[30] S. Cotterall,et al. Scaffolding for second language writers: producing an academic essay , 2003 .
[31] Jill Burstein,et al. Automated Essay Scoring : A Cross-disciplinary Perspective , 2003 .
[32] Randall W. Sadler,et al. The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing , 2003 .
[33] Jill Burstein,et al. The E-rater® scoring engine: Automated essay scoring with natural language processing. , 2003 .
[34] Sari Lindblom-Ylänne,et al. Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes? , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[35] Roseanne Greenfield,et al. COLLABORATIVE E-MAIL EXCHANGE FOR TEACHING SECONDARY ESL: A CASE STUDY IN HONG KONG , 2003 .
[36] Salvatore Valenti,et al. An Overview of Current Research on Automated Essay Grading , 2003, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..
[37] Tony Silva. Second Language Writing , 2006 .
[38] Dana R. Ferris,et al. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing , 2002 .
[39] Min Liu,et al. A Look at the Research on Computer-Based Technology Use in Second Language Learning , 2002 .
[40] Bailin Song,et al. Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: a powerful alternative? , 2002 .
[41] Robert Yates,et al. Responding to sentence-level errors in writing , 2002 .
[42] John Hall,et al. Guilt-Free Tutoring: Rethinking How We Tutor Non-Native-English-Speaking Students , 2002, Writing Center Journal.
[43] Mark Warschauer,et al. Networking into Academic Discourse , 2002 .
[44] Michelle G. Paterno. Responding to Student Writing , 2002 .
[45] Jun Liu,et al. Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms , 2002 .
[46] Terese Thonus,et al. Tutor and Student Assessments of Academic Writing Tutorials: What Is "Success?". , 2002 .
[47] Jessica Williams,et al. Undergraduate Second Language Writers in the Writing Center. , 2002 .
[48] A. Curtis. Hong Kong Student Teachers' Responses to Peer Group Process Writing , 2001 .
[49] Lucy L Fazio,et al. The Effect of Corrections and Commentaries on the Journal Writing Accuracy of Minority- and Majority-Language Students. , 2001 .
[50] Fiona Hyland,et al. Providing Effective Support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners , 2001 .
[51] Fiona Hyland,et al. Dealing with plagiarism when giving feedback , 2001 .
[52] Dana R. Ferris,et al. ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE? , 2001 .
[53] Ken Hyland,et al. Sugaring the Pill: Praise and Criticism in Written Feedback. , 2001 .
[54] Elaine DiGiovanni,et al. Online Peer Review: An Alternative to Face-to-Face? , 2001 .
[55] George Braine,et al. A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN) and in traditional classes , 2001 .
[56] Dana R. Ferris. Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes: Teaching writing for academic purposes , 2001 .
[57] Richard Watson Todd,et al. Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction , 2001 .
[58] Matthew Peacock,et al. Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes , 2001 .
[59] J. Hedgcock,et al. Teaching ESL composition : purpose, process, and practice , 2001 .
[60] Terese Thonus,et al. Triangulation in the Writing Center: Tutor, Tutee, and Instructor Perceptions of the Tutor's Role , 2001, Writing Center Journal.
[61] Amy Snyder Ohta,et al. Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese , 2001 .
[62] George M. Jacobs,et al. An Analysis of Students' Dyadic Interaction on a Dictogloss Task. , 2001 .
[63] S. Sengupta. Exchanging Ideas with Peers in Network-based Classrooms: An Aid or a Pain?. , 2001 .
[64] Fiona Hyland,et al. Teacher management of writing workshops: Two case studies , 2000 .
[65] Lia D. Kamhi-Stein,et al. Looking to the Future of TESOL Teacher Education: Web-Based Bulletin Board Discussions in a Methods Course , 2000 .
[66] Tim Ashwell,et al. Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method? , 2000 .
[67] Wang Wei,et al. Electronic literacies: language, culture, and power in online education , 2000 .
[68] A. Tsui,et al. Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments , 2000 .
[69] Olga S. Villamil,et al. Activating the ZPD: Mutual Scaffolding in L2 Peer Revision , 2000 .
[70] Sandra Murphy,et al. A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room? , 2000 .
[71] Mark Warschauer,et al. Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice , 2000 .
[72] F. Hyland. ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students , 2000 .
[73] Jean Marie Schultz,et al. Network-based Language Teaching: Computers and collaborative writing in the foreign language curriculum , 2000 .
[74] Peter W. Foltz,et al. The Debate on Automated Essay Grading , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..
[75] Catherine Caws,et al. Peer Feedback in Synchronous Writing Environments: A Case Study in French , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[76] Dwight Atkinson,et al. TESOL and Culture , 1999 .
[77] E. Berg,et al. The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality , 1999 .
[78] Trena M. Paulus,et al. The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing , 1999 .
[79] Alan Hirvela. Collaborative Writing Instruction and Communities of Readers and Writers , 1999 .
[80] Susan Conrad,et al. ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals , 1999 .
[81] J. Truscott. The Case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A Response to Ferris , 1999 .
[82] Terese Thonus,et al. How to communicate politely and be a tutor, too: NS-NNS interaction and writing center practice , 1999 .
[83] Ken Hyland,et al. Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices , 1999 .
[84] William C. Ritchie,et al. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , 1998 .
[85] D. Ferris. THE CASE FOR GRAMMAR CORRECTION IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: A RESPONSE TO TRUSCOTT (1996) , 1999 .
[86] D. Belcher. Authentic interaction in a virtual classroom: leveling the playing field in a graduate seminar1 , 1999 .
[87] Fiona Hyland,et al. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers , 1998 .
[88] George M. Jacobs,et al. Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path , 1998 .
[89] F. Myles,et al. Second Language Learning Theories , 1998 .
[90] Paul A Prior,et al. Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy , 1998 .
[91] Gayle L. Nelson,et al. ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups , 1998 .
[92] Frederick J. Dicamilla,et al. Socio-cognitive Functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom , 1998 .
[93] Carl James,et al. Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis , 1998 .
[94] S. Sengupta. Peer evaluation: ‘I am not the teacher’ , 1998 .
[95] Charlene Polio,et al. “If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions , 1998 .
[96] G. Whitney. Computer‐mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross‐cultural perspectives , 1998 .
[97] María J. Amores. A New Perspective on Peer‐Editing , 1997 .
[98] M. Warschauer. Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .
[99] D. Ferris. The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision , 1997 .
[100] Gayle L. Nelson. How Cultural Differences Affect Written and Oral Communication: The Case of Peer Response Groups , 1997 .
[101] Frederick J. Dicamilla,et al. Repetition in the Collaborative Discourse of L2 Learners: A Vygotskian Perspective , 1997 .
[102] Abdolmehdi Riazi,et al. Acquiring disciplinary literacy: A social-cognitive analysis of text production and learning among Iranian graduate students of education , 1997 .
[103] D. Ferris,et al. Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications , 1997 .
[104] Charlene Polio,et al. Measures of Linguistic Accuracy in Second Language Writing Research , 1997 .
[105] Wei-Na Zhu,et al. Triangulation in Classroom Research: A Study of Peer Revision , 1997 .
[106] Philip Shaw,et al. Academic Writing in a Second Language , 1997 .
[107] D. Ferris,et al. Writing Conferences and the Weaving of Multi-Voiced Texts in College Composition. , 1997 .
[108] George Braine,et al. Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes , 1997 .
[109] Nancy Sullivan,et al. A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom , 1996 .
[110] J. Hedgcock,et al. Some Input on Input: Two Analyses of Student Response to Expert Feedback in L2 Writing , 1996 .
[111] Sufumi So,et al. Tutoring second language text revision: Does the approach to instruction or the language of communication make a difference? , 1996 .
[112] S. Herring. Computer-mediated communication : linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives , 1996 .
[113] John Truscott,et al. Review Article The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes , 1996 .
[114] Mark Warschauer,et al. Computer Learning Networks and Student Empowerment. , 1996 .
[115] M. Meagher,et al. Perceptions of American culture : The impact of an electronically-mediated cultural exchange program on Mexican high school students , 1996 .
[116] Gayle L. Nelson,et al. Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction , 1996 .
[117] Olga S. Villamil,et al. Peer Revision in the L2 Classroom: Social-Cognitive Activities, Mediating Strategies, and Aspects of Social Behavior. , 1996 .
[118] G. G. Colomb,et al. Visible conversation and academic inquiry : CMC in a culturally diverse classroom , 1996 .
[119] Michael H. Long. The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .
[120] A. Ohta. Applying Sociocultural Theory to an Analysis of Learner Discourse: Learner-Learner Collaborative Interaction in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1995 .
[121] P. Ng,et al. Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances, Functions, and Content , 1995 .
[122] Wei Zhu,et al. Effects of Training for Peer Response on Students' Comments and Interaction , 1995 .
[123] Diana Frantzen. The Effects of Grammar Supplementation on Written Accuracy in an Intermediate Spanish Content Course , 1995 .
[124] Shuqiang Zhang. Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class , 1995 .
[125] Jane V. Nelson,et al. L2 writers and the writing center: A national survey of writing center conferencing at graduate institutions , 1995 .
[126] D. Ferris. Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms* , 1995 .
[127] Chris Hall. Comments on Joy Reid's “Responding to ESL Students' Texts: The Myths of Appropriation”: There Are Myths and Then There are Myths , 1995 .
[128] Paul A Prior,et al. Redefining the Task: An Ethnographic Examination of Writing and Response in Graduate Seminars , 1995 .
[129] George Braine,et al. Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy , 1995 .
[130] Dorothy M. Chun,et al. A hypermedia system for call in a networked environment: An abstract hypertext machine for authoring educational hypermedia , 1995 .
[131] Muriel Harris,et al. Talking in the Middle: Why Writers Need Writing Tutors. , 1995 .
[132] Olga S. Villamil,et al. Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. , 1994 .
[133] J. Lantolf,et al. Negative Feedback as Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1994 .
[134] Karen E. Johnson,et al. Peer Review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction , 1994 .
[135] Ulla Connor,et al. Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? , 1994 .
[136] H. Saito. Teachers' Practices and Students' Preferences for Feedback on Second Language Writing: A Case Study of Adult ESL Learners. , 1994 .
[137] Joy Reid,et al. Responding to ESL Students' Texts: The Myths of Appropriation , 1994 .
[138] John S. Hedgcock,et al. Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing , 1994 .
[139] N. Caulk,et al. Comparing Teacher and Student Responses to Written Work , 1994 .
[140] Gayle L. Nelson,et al. Writing Groups: Cross-Cultural Issues. , 1994 .
[141] Thea van der Geest,et al. The computer as means of communication for peer-review groups , 1994 .
[142] James P. Lantolf,et al. Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research , 1994 .
[143] J. Frommer,et al. Foreign language learning using e-mail in a task-oriented perspective: Interuniversity experiments in communication and collaboration , 1993 .
[144] Kathleen T. Brinko. The Practice of Giving Feedback to Improve Teaching: What Is Effective?. , 1993 .
[145] Marianne Phinney,et al. Computers, revision, and ESL writers: The role of experience , 1993 .
[146] Hüsnü Enginarlar,et al. Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing , 1993 .
[147] Andrea A. Lunsford,et al. Teachers' Rhetorical Comments on Student Papers. , 1993 .
[148] John M. Murphy,et al. Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts? , 1993 .
[149] Ken Hyland. ESL COMPUTER WRITERS: WHAT CAN WE DO TO HELP? , 1993 .
[150] Judith K. Powers,et al. Rethinking Writing Center Conferencing Strategies for the ESL Writer , 1993, Writing Center Journal.
[151] Mike Palmquist,et al. Network-Supported Interaction in Two Writing Classrooms. , 1993 .
[152] Mark N. Brock,et al. Teaching composition around the Pacific Rim : politics and pedagogy , 1993 .
[153] Charles A. MacArthur,et al. A Peer Editor Strategy: Guiding Learning-Disabled Students in Response and Revision , 1993, Research in the Teaching of English.
[154] Janet Lane,et al. Writing Clearly: Responding to ESL Compositions. , 1993 .
[155] J. Stanley. Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators , 1992 .
[156] John M. Murphy,et al. An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions , 1992 .
[157] J. Hedgcock,et al. Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction , 1992 .
[158] Kate Mangelsdorf,et al. ESL student response stances in a peer-review task , 1992 .
[159] Ken Sheppard. Two Feedback Types: Do They Make A Difference? , 1992 .
[160] Seppo Tella,et al. Talking Shop via E-Mail: A Thematic and Linguistic Analysis of Electronic Mail Communication. Research Report 99. , 1992 .
[161] Christine Goring. Kepner. An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second‐Language Writing Skills , 1991 .
[162] Ilona Leki. THE PREFERENCES OF ESL STUDENTS FOR ERROR CORRECTION IN COLLEGE-LEVEL WRITING CLASSES , 1991 .
[163] Etienne Wenger,et al. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .
[164] A. Cohen,et al. Second Language Writing: Feedback on compositions: teacher and student verbal reports , 1990 .
[165] Ann K. Fathman,et al. Second Language Writing: Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content , 1990 .
[166] Ilona Leki,et al. Second Language Writing: Coaching from the margins: issues in written response , 1990 .
[167] L. Flower,et al. Reading-to-Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process , 1990 .
[168] Susan Conrad,et al. Student Input and Negotiation of Meaning in ESL Writing Conferences , 1990 .
[169] Jackie Head,et al. Writing and Response , 1990 .
[170] Ulla Connor,et al. Exploring the Dynamics of Cross-Cultural Collaboration in Writing Classrooms , 1990 .
[171] Duane Roen,et al. Richness in Writing: Empowering Esl Students , 1989 .
[172] J. Swales,et al. ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work , 1988 .
[173] Sarah Warshauer Freedman,et al. Response to Student Writing , 1987 .
[174] M. Scardamalia,et al. The psychology of written composition , 1987 .
[175] Daniel Horowitz,et al. Process, Not Product: Less Than Meets the Eye , 1986 .
[176] Steven J. Ross,et al. SALIENCE OF FEEDBACK ON ERROR AND ITS EFFECT ON EFL WRITING QUALITY , 1986 .
[177] Michael H. Long,et al. Group Work, Interlanguage Talk,and Second Language Acquisition. , 1985 .
[178] C. Chaudron. The Effects of Feedback on Students' Composition Revisions , 1984 .
[179] K. Bruffee. Collaborative Learning and the “Conversation of Mankind” , 1984, College English.
[180] Richard Beach,et al. New directions in composition research , 1984 .
[181] Lil Brannon,et al. Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing , 1984 .
[182] Gary A. Olson. Writing centers : theory and administration , 1984 .
[183] John F. Lalande. Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment , 1982 .
[184] B. Joyce,et al. Models of Teaching , 2024 .
[185] C. Knoblauch,et al. Teacher Commentary on Student Writing: The State of the Art. , 1981 .
[186] L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al. Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .