Feedback on second language students' writing

Feedback is widely seen as crucial for encouraging and consolidating learning, and this significance has also been recognised by those working in the field of second language (L2) writing. Its importance is acknowledged in process-based classrooms, where it forms a key element of the students' growing control over composing skills, and by genre-oriented teachers employing scaffolded learning techniques. In fact, over the past twenty years, changes in writing pedagogy and research have transformed feedback practices, with teacher written comments often supplemented with peer feedback, writing workshops, conferences, and computer-delivered feedback. But while feedback is a central aspect of ESL/EFL writing programs across the world, the research literature has not been unequivocally positive about its role in writing development, and teachers often have a sense that they are not making use of its full potential. In this paper we examine recent research related to feedback on L2 students' writing, focusing on the role of feedback in writing instruction and discussing current issues relating to teacher written and oral feedback, collaborative peer feedback and computer-mediated feedback.

[1]  Dana Ferris,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction , 2006 .

[2]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Interpersonal aspects of response: constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. , 2006 .

[3]  Masuhiro Kogoma 総論;総論;Introduction , 2006 .

[4]  C. Tardy Feedback in Second Language Writing: Appropriation, ownership, and agency: Negotiating teacher feedback in academic settings , 2006 .

[5]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Cultural issues in peer response: Revisiting “culture” , 2006 .

[6]  Caroline Coffin,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Formative interaction in electronic written exchanges: Fostering feedback dialogue , 2006 .

[7]  Liz Hamp-Lyons Feedback in Second Language Writing: Feedback in portfolio-based writing courses , 2006 .

[8]  John Milton,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Resource-rich Web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers , 2006 .

[9]  Hui-Tzu Min,et al.  Training students to become successful peer reviewers , 2005 .

[10]  J. Milton,et al.  From Parrots to Puppet masters: fostering creative and authentic language use with online tools , 2005 .

[11]  Lynn M. Goldstein Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms , 2005 .

[12]  Marie-Noëlle Lamy,et al.  ’Reflective conversation’ in the virtual language classroom , 2005 .

[13]  Icy Lee,et al.  Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong , 2004 .

[14]  J. Truscott EVIDENCE AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTION: A RESPONSE TO CHANDLER , 2004 .

[15]  Jessica Williams,et al.  The writing center and second language writers , 2004 .

[16]  Jessica Williams,et al.  Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center , 2004 .

[17]  Sara Cushing Weigle,et al.  Novice Tutors and Their ESL Tutees: Three Case Studies of Tutor Roles and Perceptions of Tutorial Success. , 2004 .

[18]  Tom Cobb,et al.  Can Learners Use Concordance Feedback for Writing Errors , 2004 .

[19]  Terese Thonus,et al.  What are the differences? Tutor interactions with first- and second-language writers , 2004 .

[20]  Martin Chodorow,et al.  Automated Essay Evaluation: The Criterion Online Writing Service , 2004, AI Mag..

[21]  Frank Tuzi,et al.  The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course , 2004 .

[22]  Lynn M. Goldstein Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together , 2004 .

[23]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines☆ , 2004 .

[24]  D. Ferris The ‘‘Grammar Correction’ ’ Debate in L2 Writing: , 2022 .

[25]  Paige Ware,et al.  Confidence and competition online: ESL student perspectives on web-based discussions in the classroom , 2004 .

[26]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Second Language Writing , 2003 .

[27]  Fiona Hyland,et al.  Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback , 2003 .

[28]  Yi Yuan,et al.  The use of chat rooms in an ESL setting , 2003 .

[29]  R. O’Dowd UNDERSTANDING THE "OTHER SIDE": INTERCULTURAL LEARNING IN A SPANISH-ENGLISH E-MAIL EXCHANGE , 2003 .

[30]  S. Cotterall,et al.  Scaffolding for second language writers: producing an academic essay , 2003 .

[31]  Jill Burstein,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring : A Cross-disciplinary Perspective , 2003 .

[32]  Randall W. Sadler,et al.  The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing , 2003 .

[33]  Jill Burstein,et al.  The E-rater® scoring engine: Automated essay scoring with natural language processing. , 2003 .

[34]  Sari Lindblom-Ylänne,et al.  Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes? , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[35]  Roseanne Greenfield,et al.  COLLABORATIVE E-MAIL EXCHANGE FOR TEACHING SECONDARY ESL: A CASE STUDY IN HONG KONG , 2003 .

[36]  Salvatore Valenti,et al.  An Overview of Current Research on Automated Essay Grading , 2003, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[37]  Tony Silva Second Language Writing , 2006 .

[38]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing , 2002 .

[39]  Min Liu,et al.  A Look at the Research on Computer-Based Technology Use in Second Language Learning , 2002 .

[40]  Bailin Song,et al.  Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: a powerful alternative? , 2002 .

[41]  Robert Yates,et al.  Responding to sentence-level errors in writing , 2002 .

[42]  John Hall,et al.  Guilt-Free Tutoring: Rethinking How We Tutor Non-Native-English-Speaking Students , 2002, Writing Center Journal.

[43]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Networking into Academic Discourse , 2002 .

[44]  Michelle G. Paterno Responding to Student Writing , 2002 .

[45]  Jun Liu,et al.  Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms , 2002 .

[46]  Terese Thonus,et al.  Tutor and Student Assessments of Academic Writing Tutorials: What Is "Success?". , 2002 .

[47]  Jessica Williams,et al.  Undergraduate Second Language Writers in the Writing Center. , 2002 .

[48]  A. Curtis Hong Kong Student Teachers' Responses to Peer Group Process Writing , 2001 .

[49]  Lucy L Fazio,et al.  The Effect of Corrections and Commentaries on the Journal Writing Accuracy of Minority- and Majority-Language Students. , 2001 .

[50]  Fiona Hyland,et al.  Providing Effective Support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners , 2001 .

[51]  Fiona Hyland,et al.  Dealing with plagiarism when giving feedback , 2001 .

[52]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE? , 2001 .

[53]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Sugaring the Pill: Praise and Criticism in Written Feedback. , 2001 .

[54]  Elaine DiGiovanni,et al.  Online Peer Review: An Alternative to Face-to-Face? , 2001 .

[55]  George Braine,et al.  A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN) and in traditional classes , 2001 .

[56]  Dana R. Ferris Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes: Teaching writing for academic purposes , 2001 .

[57]  Richard Watson Todd,et al.  Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction , 2001 .

[58]  Matthew Peacock,et al.  Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes , 2001 .

[59]  J. Hedgcock,et al.  Teaching ESL composition : purpose, process, and practice , 2001 .

[60]  Terese Thonus,et al.  Triangulation in the Writing Center: Tutor, Tutee, and Instructor Perceptions of the Tutor's Role , 2001, Writing Center Journal.

[61]  Amy Snyder Ohta,et al.  Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese , 2001 .

[62]  George M. Jacobs,et al.  An Analysis of Students' Dyadic Interaction on a Dictogloss Task. , 2001 .

[63]  S. Sengupta Exchanging Ideas with Peers in Network-based Classrooms: An Aid or a Pain?. , 2001 .

[64]  Fiona Hyland,et al.  Teacher management of writing workshops: Two case studies , 2000 .

[65]  Lia D. Kamhi-Stein,et al.  Looking to the Future of TESOL Teacher Education: Web-Based Bulletin Board Discussions in a Methods Course , 2000 .

[66]  Tim Ashwell,et al.  Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method? , 2000 .

[67]  Wang Wei,et al.  Electronic literacies: language, culture, and power in online education , 2000 .

[68]  A. Tsui,et al.  Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments , 2000 .

[69]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Activating the ZPD: Mutual Scaffolding in L2 Peer Revision , 2000 .

[70]  Sandra Murphy,et al.  A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room? , 2000 .

[71]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice , 2000 .

[72]  F. Hyland ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students , 2000 .

[73]  Jean Marie Schultz,et al.  Network-based Language Teaching: Computers and collaborative writing in the foreign language curriculum , 2000 .

[74]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  The Debate on Automated Essay Grading , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[75]  Catherine Caws,et al.  Peer Feedback in Synchronous Writing Environments: A Case Study in French , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[76]  Dwight Atkinson,et al.  TESOL and Culture , 1999 .

[77]  E. Berg,et al.  The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality , 1999 .

[78]  Trena M. Paulus,et al.  The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing , 1999 .

[79]  Alan Hirvela Collaborative Writing Instruction and Communities of Readers and Writers , 1999 .

[80]  Susan Conrad,et al.  ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals , 1999 .

[81]  J. Truscott The Case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A Response to Ferris , 1999 .

[82]  Terese Thonus,et al.  How to communicate politely and be a tutor, too: NS-NNS interaction and writing center practice , 1999 .

[83]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices , 1999 .

[84]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , 1998 .

[85]  D. Ferris THE CASE FOR GRAMMAR CORRECTION IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: A RESPONSE TO TRUSCOTT (1996) , 1999 .

[86]  D. Belcher Authentic interaction in a virtual classroom: leveling the playing field in a graduate seminar1 , 1999 .

[87]  Fiona Hyland,et al.  The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers , 1998 .

[88]  George M. Jacobs,et al.  Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path , 1998 .

[89]  F. Myles,et al.  Second Language Learning Theories , 1998 .

[90]  Paul A Prior,et al.  Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy , 1998 .

[91]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups , 1998 .

[92]  Frederick J. Dicamilla,et al.  Socio-cognitive Functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom , 1998 .

[93]  Carl James,et al.  Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis , 1998 .

[94]  S. Sengupta Peer evaluation: ‘I am not the teacher’ , 1998 .

[95]  Charlene Polio,et al.  “If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions , 1998 .

[96]  G. Whitney Computer‐mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross‐cultural perspectives , 1998 .

[97]  María J. Amores A New Perspective on Peer‐Editing , 1997 .

[98]  M. Warschauer Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[99]  D. Ferris The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision , 1997 .

[100]  Gayle L. Nelson How Cultural Differences Affect Written and Oral Communication: The Case of Peer Response Groups , 1997 .

[101]  Frederick J. Dicamilla,et al.  Repetition in the Collaborative Discourse of L2 Learners: A Vygotskian Perspective , 1997 .

[102]  Abdolmehdi Riazi,et al.  Acquiring disciplinary literacy: A social-cognitive analysis of text production and learning among Iranian graduate students of education , 1997 .

[103]  D. Ferris,et al.  Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications , 1997 .

[104]  Charlene Polio,et al.  Measures of Linguistic Accuracy in Second Language Writing Research , 1997 .

[105]  Wei-Na Zhu,et al.  Triangulation in Classroom Research: A Study of Peer Revision , 1997 .

[106]  Philip Shaw,et al.  Academic Writing in a Second Language , 1997 .

[107]  D. Ferris,et al.  Writing Conferences and the Weaving of Multi-Voiced Texts in College Composition. , 1997 .

[108]  George Braine,et al.  Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes , 1997 .

[109]  Nancy Sullivan,et al.  A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom , 1996 .

[110]  J. Hedgcock,et al.  Some Input on Input: Two Analyses of Student Response to Expert Feedback in L2 Writing , 1996 .

[111]  Sufumi So,et al.  Tutoring second language text revision: Does the approach to instruction or the language of communication make a difference? , 1996 .

[112]  S. Herring Computer-mediated communication : linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives , 1996 .

[113]  John Truscott,et al.  Review Article The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes , 1996 .

[114]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Computer Learning Networks and Student Empowerment. , 1996 .

[115]  M. Meagher,et al.  Perceptions of American culture : The impact of an electronically-mediated cultural exchange program on Mexican high school students , 1996 .

[116]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction , 1996 .

[117]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Peer Revision in the L2 Classroom: Social-Cognitive Activities, Mediating Strategies, and Aspects of Social Behavior. , 1996 .

[118]  G. G. Colomb,et al.  Visible conversation and academic inquiry : CMC in a culturally diverse classroom , 1996 .

[119]  Michael H. Long The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[120]  A. Ohta Applying Sociocultural Theory to an Analysis of Learner Discourse: Learner-Learner Collaborative Interaction in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1995 .

[121]  P. Ng,et al.  Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances, Functions, and Content , 1995 .

[122]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Effects of Training for Peer Response on Students' Comments and Interaction , 1995 .

[123]  Diana Frantzen The Effects of Grammar Supplementation on Written Accuracy in an Intermediate Spanish Content Course , 1995 .

[124]  Shuqiang Zhang Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class , 1995 .

[125]  Jane V. Nelson,et al.  L2 writers and the writing center: A national survey of writing center conferencing at graduate institutions , 1995 .

[126]  D. Ferris Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms* , 1995 .

[127]  Chris Hall Comments on Joy Reid's “Responding to ESL Students' Texts: The Myths of Appropriation”: There Are Myths and Then There are Myths , 1995 .

[128]  Paul A Prior,et al.  Redefining the Task: An Ethnographic Examination of Writing and Response in Graduate Seminars , 1995 .

[129]  George Braine,et al.  Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy , 1995 .

[130]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  A hypermedia system for call in a networked environment: An abstract hypertext machine for authoring educational hypermedia , 1995 .

[131]  Muriel Harris,et al.  Talking in the Middle: Why Writers Need Writing Tutors. , 1995 .

[132]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. , 1994 .

[133]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Negative Feedback as Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1994 .

[134]  Karen E. Johnson,et al.  Peer Review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction , 1994 .

[135]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? , 1994 .

[136]  H. Saito Teachers' Practices and Students' Preferences for Feedback on Second Language Writing: A Case Study of Adult ESL Learners. , 1994 .

[137]  Joy Reid,et al.  Responding to ESL Students' Texts: The Myths of Appropriation , 1994 .

[138]  John S. Hedgcock,et al.  Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing , 1994 .

[139]  N. Caulk,et al.  Comparing Teacher and Student Responses to Written Work , 1994 .

[140]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  Writing Groups: Cross-Cultural Issues. , 1994 .

[141]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  The computer as means of communication for peer-review groups , 1994 .

[142]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research , 1994 .

[143]  J. Frommer,et al.  Foreign language learning using e-mail in a task-oriented perspective: Interuniversity experiments in communication and collaboration , 1993 .

[144]  Kathleen T. Brinko The Practice of Giving Feedback to Improve Teaching: What Is Effective?. , 1993 .

[145]  Marianne Phinney,et al.  Computers, revision, and ESL writers: The role of experience , 1993 .

[146]  Hüsnü Enginarlar,et al.  Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing , 1993 .

[147]  Andrea A. Lunsford,et al.  Teachers' Rhetorical Comments on Student Papers. , 1993 .

[148]  John M. Murphy,et al.  Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts? , 1993 .

[149]  Ken Hyland ESL COMPUTER WRITERS: WHAT CAN WE DO TO HELP? , 1993 .

[150]  Judith K. Powers,et al.  Rethinking Writing Center Conferencing Strategies for the ESL Writer , 1993, Writing Center Journal.

[151]  Mike Palmquist,et al.  Network-Supported Interaction in Two Writing Classrooms. , 1993 .

[152]  Mark N. Brock,et al.  Teaching composition around the Pacific Rim : politics and pedagogy , 1993 .

[153]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  A Peer Editor Strategy: Guiding Learning-Disabled Students in Response and Revision , 1993, Research in the Teaching of English.

[154]  Janet Lane,et al.  Writing Clearly: Responding to ESL Compositions. , 1993 .

[155]  J. Stanley Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators , 1992 .

[156]  John M. Murphy,et al.  An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions , 1992 .

[157]  J. Hedgcock,et al.  Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction , 1992 .

[158]  Kate Mangelsdorf,et al.  ESL student response stances in a peer-review task , 1992 .

[159]  Ken Sheppard Two Feedback Types: Do They Make A Difference? , 1992 .

[160]  Seppo Tella,et al.  Talking Shop via E-Mail: A Thematic and Linguistic Analysis of Electronic Mail Communication. Research Report 99. , 1992 .

[161]  Christine Goring. Kepner An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second‐Language Writing Skills , 1991 .

[162]  Ilona Leki THE PREFERENCES OF ESL STUDENTS FOR ERROR CORRECTION IN COLLEGE-LEVEL WRITING CLASSES , 1991 .

[163]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[164]  A. Cohen,et al.  Second Language Writing: Feedback on compositions: teacher and student verbal reports , 1990 .

[165]  Ann K. Fathman,et al.  Second Language Writing: Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content , 1990 .

[166]  Ilona Leki,et al.  Second Language Writing: Coaching from the margins: issues in written response , 1990 .

[167]  L. Flower,et al.  Reading-to-Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process , 1990 .

[168]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Student Input and Negotiation of Meaning in ESL Writing Conferences , 1990 .

[169]  Jackie Head,et al.  Writing and Response , 1990 .

[170]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Exploring the Dynamics of Cross-Cultural Collaboration in Writing Classrooms , 1990 .

[171]  Duane Roen,et al.  Richness in Writing: Empowering Esl Students , 1989 .

[172]  J. Swales,et al.  ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work , 1988 .

[173]  Sarah Warshauer Freedman,et al.  Response to Student Writing , 1987 .

[174]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[175]  Daniel Horowitz,et al.  Process, Not Product: Less Than Meets the Eye , 1986 .

[176]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  SALIENCE OF FEEDBACK ON ERROR AND ITS EFFECT ON EFL WRITING QUALITY , 1986 .

[177]  Michael H. Long,et al.  Group Work, Interlanguage Talk,and Second Language Acquisition. , 1985 .

[178]  C. Chaudron The Effects of Feedback on Students' Composition Revisions , 1984 .

[179]  K. Bruffee Collaborative Learning and the “Conversation of Mankind” , 1984, College English.

[180]  Richard Beach,et al.  New directions in composition research , 1984 .

[181]  Lil Brannon,et al.  Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing , 1984 .

[182]  Gary A. Olson Writing centers : theory and administration , 1984 .

[183]  John F. Lalande Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment , 1982 .

[184]  B. Joyce,et al.  Models of Teaching , 2024 .

[185]  C. Knoblauch,et al.  Teacher Commentary on Student Writing: The State of the Art. , 1981 .

[186]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .