Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design

If design used to be a matter of physical form, its subject the material object, it now increasingly seems to be about the user and her experiences. A central problem with this development is the confusion between what we are designing and who is going to use it—the shift towards user design. Trying to optimise fit on basis of knowledge about use and users, we risk trapping people in a situation where the use of our designs has been over-determined and where there is not enough space left to act and improvise.

[1]  C. Bullard.  Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[2]  Janice Redish,et al.  User and task analysis for interface design , 1998 .

[3]  Iain Borden,et al.  Another Pavement, Another Beach: Skateboarding and the Performative Critique of Architecture , 2001 .

[4]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[5]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[6]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Bringing Design to Software , 1996 .

[7]  Ulrich Conrads,et al.  Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture , 1970 .

[8]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[9]  Godfried Engbersen.  The unknown city , 1995 .

[10]  Victor Margolin,et al.  Discovering Design: Explorations in Design Studies , 2000 .

[11]  Elzbieta T. Kazmierczak.  Design as Meaning Making: From Making Things to the Design of Thinking , 2003, Design Issues.

[12]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  New Methodologies in Art and Design Research: The Object as Discourse , 1999 .

[13]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Wireless World – Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age, Barry Brown, Nicola Green and Richard Harper (eds.) , 2001, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[14]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design , 1999 .

[15]  Kim Cascone,et al.  The Aesthetics of Failure: Post-Digital Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music , 2000, Computer Music Journal.

[16]  Olga Taxidou,et al.  Modernism: An Anthology of Sources and Documents , 1998 .

[17]  Don Ihde.  Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction , 1998 .

[18]  Andreas Beu,et al.  Engineering Joy , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[19]  Don Ihde.  Philosophy of Technology , 2004 .

[20]  Y. Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design , 2002 .

[21]  J. Thackara,et al.  Design after modernism : beyond the object , 1988 .

[22]  P. Jordan.  Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors , 2000 .

[23]  Andrew Blauvelt,et al.  Strangely familiar : design and everyday life , 2003 .

[24]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  The New Everyday: Views on Ambient Intelligence , 2003 .

[25]  B. Langer,et al.  The Practice of Everyday Life , 2019, Forms of Thinking in Leopardi’s Zibaldone.

[26]  Gillian Crampton Smith,et al.  The role of the artist-designer , 1996 .

[27]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[28]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[29]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[30]  E. Goffman.  Where The Action Is , 1969 .

[31]  Anne Galloway,et al.  Design for hackability , 2004, DIS '04.

[32]  Alexandra Weilenmann,et al.  Local use and sharing of mobile phones , 2001 .

[33]  C. Thomas Mitchell.  Redefining Designing: From Form to Experience , 1992 .

[34]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects , 2001 .