A role for recurrent processing in object completion: neurophysiological, psychophysical and computational"evidence

Recognition of objects from partial information presents a significant challenge for theories of vision because it requires spatial integration and extrapolation from prior knowledge. We combined neurophysiological recordings in human cortex with psychophysical measurements and computational modeling to investigate the mechanisms involved in object completion. We recorded intracranial field potentials from 1,699 electrodes in 18 epilepsy patients to measure the timing and selectivity of responses along human visual cortex to whole and partial objects. Responses along the ventral visual stream remained selective despite showing only 9-25% of the object. However, these visually selective signals emerged ~100 ms later for partial versus whole objects. The processing delays were particularly pronounced in higher visual areas within the ventral stream, suggesting the involvement of additional recurrent processing. In separate psychophysics experiments, disrupting this recurrent computation with a backward mask at ~75ms significantly impaired recognition of partial, but not whole, objects. Additionally, computational modeling shows that the performance of a purely bottom-up architecture is impaired by heavy occlusion and that this effect can be partially rescued via the incorporation of top-down connections. These results provide spatiotemporal constraints on theories of object recognition that involve recurrent processing to recognize objects from partial information.

[1]  C. Mehring,et al.  Inference of hand movements from local field potentials in monkey motor cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  The detection of visual signals by macaque frontal eye field during masking , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[6]  E. Rolls Neural organization of higher visual functions , 1991, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Tiangang Zhou,et al.  Cortical Dynamics Underlying Face Completion in Human Visual System , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  David J. Jilk,et al.  Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition , 2011, Frontiers in Psychology.

[10]  Minami Ito,et al.  Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Single-Unit Responses Selective for Whole Faces in the Human Amygdala , 2011, Current Biology.

[13]  Pejman Sehatpour,et al.  A human intracranial study of long-range oscillatory coherence across a frontal–occipital–hippocampal brain network during visual object processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Kunihiko Fukushima,et al.  Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position , 1980, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Juan R. Vidal,et al.  Category-Specific Visual Responses: An Intracranial Study Comparing Gamma, Beta, Alpha, and ERP Response Selectivity , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[19]  Gabriel Kreiman,et al.  Tutorial on Pattern Classification in Cell Recording , 2011 .

[20]  Thomas Serre,et al.  A quantitative theory of immediate visual recognition. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[21]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Rapid completion effects in human high-order visual areas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[22]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Elias B. Issa,et al.  Precedence of the Eye Region in Neural Processing of Faces , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  G. Kreiman,et al.  Timing, Timing, Timing: Fast Decoding of Object Information from Intracranial Field Potentials in Human Visual Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[25]  E. Rolls,et al.  A Neurodynamical cortical model of visual attention and invariant object recognition , 2004, Vision Research.

[26]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Visual responses of inferior temporal neurons in awake rhesus monkey. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.