An Index to Quantify global world educational‘s Engineering and medical Scientific Research Output

The concept of new knowledge were analyzed based in the citation , impact factor, cited and un cited papers and h-index were basis of a contemporary tendency of parameterization of everything and the potential measure of the knowledge progress, which recognizes individuals, institutions, national and international university in Engineering sub-disciplines such civil engineering, mechanical engineering, automation, minining, transport, environmental etc were quantify h-index for prediction of gross domestic productive and unproductive of the research output over the world in which the highest index in the world was US and UK. It has been found that the population of the best keeps basically the same relations between the h-index and a number of publication, and between the h-index and a citation number. However, even the best in Engineering should publish 2-3 times a year or more papers to receive the same h-index as top scientists or Professor or best Engineer or Doctor in Engineering or medicals sciences in overall domains. The Author Dr Sanjay Gupta made emphasis over the slope of the number of publication and impact factor of the technical manuscript as per the world Scale. The numerical value after analysis of the slope existing in between or less than 1,2,3 , the output of the international or national university can be categorized on the individual Professor research output and minimum h-index for the professor .All three categories gave a nation best gross domestic product research output. Out of all three categories less than 3 , gave the excellent performance of the individual , university and international university .The Author elaborated slope based on their own research output and giving a scale of approximately 3. The Author Dr Sanjay Gupta has achieved an excellent research output in Civil Engineering in world scale. The Nobel prizes achieved all over the world were also represented with world scale of Hrich index based on the Hi index starting from 15 to 75 for a non technical physics papers. Keeping the view of the world scale the Author Dr Sanjay Gupta achievement during the entire career varying H-Index in between 20-30 In Civil Engineering. The mechanism how to increase the h-index has been presented based on the WOS, scoupos or DOI as well as Google. Some similarities between H-index and the journal impact factor (JIF) have been stressed. Also the universal role of H-index in ranking countries in all areas and in Engineering and medical sciences.

[1]  Igor Podlubny,et al.  Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[2]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Testing the Calculation of a Realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for , 2008 .

[3]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[4]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized h-index for Disclosing Latent Facts in Citation Networks , 2006, ArXiv.

[6]  Leo Egghe,et al.  An informetric model for the Hirsch-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[7]  Juan E. Iglesias,et al.  Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields , 2006, Scientometrics.

[8]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do we know about the h index? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[10]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Testing the Calculation of a Realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster , 2008, Libr. Trends.

[11]  Aggelos Bletsas,et al.  Hirsch index rankings require scaling and higher moment , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[13]  Igor Podlubny,et al.  Towards a better list of citation superstars: compiling a multidisciplinary list of highly cited researchers , 2006, ArXiv.

[14]  Anthony F. J. van Raan Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups , 2013, Scientometrics.

[15]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[16]  Jiang Li,et al.  Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[17]  Miguel A. García-Pérez,et al.  Strange attractors in the Web of Science database , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[18]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  On the Opportunities and Limitations of the H-index , 2006 .