Member engagement within digitally enabled social network communities: new methodological considerations

Digitally enabled social networks (DESN) are a complex assemblage of engagement, reflection, action, technology, organization and community. DESN create a unique challenge for researchers who aim to understand what social networks are, what they can become and what enablers and constraints underlie trajectories of member engagement. As DESN continually evolve, knowing them as stable and reified representations or as mere technology artefacts provides a limited understanding of their complexity and emergent properties. While DESN are, in part, the technology that supports the necessary actions for engagement, they are also the people and behaviours that constitute its community. Through the presentation of new methodological considerations towards Digg, a large DESN, we observe that social networks entail practices of engagement, change and evolution within a DESN community. We reveal how engagement is a communal endeavour and that the clash of socio‐technical trajectories can result in the emergence of new paths of member participation. Our findings demonstrate the potential of netnography and impressionist tales for contributing to the ongoing pluralistic investigations of DESN and also inform research on engagement and community design and change.

[1]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  David E. Avison,et al.  Information systems and anthropology: and anthropological perspective on IT and organizational culture , 1995, Inf. Technol. People.

[3]  Heidi A. Campbell,et al.  Creating digital enclaves: Negotiation of the internet among bounded religious communities , 2011 .

[4]  A. Chadwick Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity , 2007 .

[5]  Jiyao Xun,et al.  Applying netnography to market research: The case of the online forum , 2010 .

[6]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: An empirical study , 2008, J. Syst. Softw..

[7]  G. L. Bon,et al.  Scientific Literature: The Crowd. A Study of the Popular Mind , 1897 .

[8]  D. Weir Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 2013 .

[9]  N. Baym Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community , 1999 .

[10]  Clifford Stott,et al.  Transforming the boundaries of collective identity: from the ‘local’ anti-road campaign to ‘global’ resistance? , 2003 .

[11]  Shane S. Dikolli,et al.  Improvements in the Information Content of Nonfinancial Forward‐Looking Performance Measures: A Taxonomy and Empirical Application , 2007 .

[12]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Exploring sociotechnical interaction with Rob Kling: five "big" ideas , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[13]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science Research , 2014, Computing Handbook, 3rd ed..

[14]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Methodological practice and policy for organisationally and socially relevant IS research: an inclusive–exclusive perspective , 2011, J. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[17]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  Lee Komito,et al.  The Net as a Foraging Society: Flexible Communities , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[19]  R. Gurrea,et al.  The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Rob Kling,et al.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[21]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[22]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[23]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[24]  Delia Dumitrica Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online , 2013 .

[25]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  Secondary Design: A Case of Behavioral Design Science Research , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Chris Arney Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2008 .

[27]  Catherine M. Ridings,et al.  Online discussion group sustainability: Investigating the interplay between structural dynamics and social dynamics over time , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  J. Hayden Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age , 2011 .

[29]  R. Kozinets The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities , 2002 .

[30]  M. Bunge Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge , 2003 .

[31]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[32]  George Kuk,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Storied spaces: Cultural accounts of mobility, technology, and environmental knowing , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[35]  Ken Plummer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism in the Twentieth Century , 2000 .