Confidential Areas In Innovation Communities: An Agent-Based Model Using Fuzzy Logic and Qualitative Empirical Data

This paper examines the relationship between social and utilitarian incentives in innovation communities. We develop an agent-based model using insights from a qualitative empirical study. This method combination is motivated by shortcomings of empirical research to capture the dynamics and the interactions between social and utilitarian incentives. Thus, we use the synergy between complex systems thinking and its strengths in modeling in combination with qualitative empirical research, which is powerful to recognize phenomena. The problem of incorporating decisions driven by multiple motivations is approached by including fuzzy interfaces in the model. With the method combination of qualitative empirical research, agent-based modeling, and fuzzy logic we can answer questions of social and utilitarian motives and their relation to innovation performance in communities. We find that community members do not only want to innovate but have social motives in addition. Further, some innovation communities have areas which we call confidential areas. These are areas for high performers. In the simulation we find that such confidential areas improve innovation performance. However, this effect depends on the access restriction. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, it improves the understanding of innovation communities and the incentives for contributing. The extant literature on innovation management profits from a dynamic perspective on community-based innovation. Second, we provide a novel method combination that is useful for capturing complex phenomena from the empirical perspective.

[1]  Joshua C. Hall,et al.  Hackerspaces: a case study in the creation and management of a common pool resource , 2015, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[2]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis , 1982 .

[3]  E. von Hippel,et al.  User Generated Brands and their Contribution to the Diffusion of User Innovations , 2012 .

[4]  K. Boudreau,et al.  'Open' Disclosure of Innovations, Incentives and Follow-on Reuse: Theory on Processes of Cumulative Innovation and a Field Experiment in Computational Biology , 2015 .

[5]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[6]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation , 2008 .

[7]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study , 2006 .

[8]  Özge Dilaver Kalkan From Participants to Agents: Grounded Simulation as a Mixed-Method Research Design , 2015, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[9]  K. Lakhani,et al.  The Principles of Distributed Innovation , 2007, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[10]  J. Henkel Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[11]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Innovation as an interactive process , 2016 .

[13]  KroghGeorg von,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model , 2003 .

[14]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Simulation for the social scientist , 1999 .

[15]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[16]  Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Simulating Innovation: Computer-Based Tools for Rethinking Innovation , 2014 .

[17]  Hugues Bersini,et al.  Recurrent fuzzy systems , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference.

[18]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[19]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  The Core and Cosmopolitans: A Relational View of Innovation in User Communities , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[20]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Computing Krippendorff's Alpha-Reliability , 2011 .

[21]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Open Collaboration for Innovation: Principles and Performance , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[23]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[24]  Boris Lohmann,et al.  Modeling Cyclic Interactions within a Production Environment Using Transition Adaptive Recurrent Fuzzy Systems , 2013, MIM.

[25]  Boris Lohmann,et al.  Transient probabilistic recurrent fuzzy systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[26]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Second Language Research: Methodology and Design , 2021 .

[27]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[28]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development , 2012, MIS Q..

[29]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches , 1966 .

[30]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[31]  C. Cioffi-Revilla Fuzzy Sets and Models of International Relations , 1981 .

[32]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[33]  K. Frenken Innovation, Evolution and Complexity Theory , 2006 .

[34]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[35]  Martin Neumann Grounded Simulation , 2013, ESSA.

[36]  R. Allen,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4 (1983) 1-24. North-Holland COLLECTIVE INVENTION , 1982 .

[37]  Pablo del Río,et al.  The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems , 2013 .

[38]  C. Herstatt,et al.  The Effect of Selective Openness on Value Creation in User Innovation Communities , 2014 .

[39]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  Predicting New Product Success with Prediction Markets in Online Communities , 2013 .

[40]  Michael A. Zaggl,et al.  Eleven mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation , 2014 .