An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots

Soft robots possess many attributes that are difficult, if not impossible, to achieve with conventional robots composed of rigid materials. Yet, despite recent advances, soft robots must still be tethered to hard robotic control systems and power sources. New strategies for creating completely soft robots, including soft analogues of these crucial components, are needed to realize their full potential. Here we report the untethered operation of a robot composed solely of soft materials. The robot is controlled with microfluidic logic that autonomously regulates fluid flow and, hence, catalytic decomposition of an on-board monopropellant fuel supply. Gas generated from the fuel decomposition inflates fluidic networks downstream of the reaction sites, resulting in actuation. The body and microfluidic logic of the robot are fabricated using moulding and soft lithography, respectively, and the pneumatic actuator networks, on-board fuel reservoirs and catalytic reaction chambers needed for movement are patterned within the body via a multi-material, embedded 3D printing technique. The fluidic and elastomeric architectures required for function span several orders of magnitude from the microscale to the macroscale. Our integrated design and rapid fabrication approach enables the programmable assembly of multiple materials within this architecture, laying the foundation for completely soft, autonomous robots.

[1]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly , 2014 .

[2]  S. Quake,et al.  Microfluidic Memory and Control Devices , 2003, Science.

[3]  L. Ionov Biomimetic Hydrogel‐Based Actuating Systems , 2013 .

[4]  Koichi Suzumori,et al.  Integrated flexible microactuator systems , 1996, Robotica.

[5]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Pneumatic Energy Sources for Autonomous and Wearable Soft Robotics , 2014 .

[6]  David J Beebe,et al.  Microfluidic logic gates and timers. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[7]  George M Whitesides,et al.  What comes next? , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[8]  Patrick S Doyle,et al.  Permeation-driven flow in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Mark A Burns,et al.  Microfluidic pneumatic logic circuits and digital pneumatic microprocessors for integrated microfluidic systems. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[10]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  High-density fabrication of normally closed microfluidic valves by patterned deactivation of oxidized polydimethylsiloxane. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[11]  Huai-Ti Lin,et al.  GoQBot: a caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[12]  E.C. Jensen,et al.  Micropneumatic Digital Logic Structures for Integrated Microdevice Computation and Control , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[13]  H. Barnes Thixotropy—a review , 1997 .

[14]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft Machines That are Resistant to Puncture and That Self Seal , 2013, Advanced materials.

[15]  Xin Chen,et al.  Soft Mobile Robots with On-Board Chemical Pressure Generation , 2011, ISRR.

[16]  Jamie L. Branch,et al.  Robotic Tentacles with Three‐Dimensional Mobility Based on Flexible Elastomers , 2013, Advanced materials.

[17]  E. Palleau,et al.  Reversible patterning and actuation of hydrogels by electrically assisted ionoprinting , 2013, Nature Communications.

[18]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Autonomous Soft Robotic Fish Capable of Escape Maneuvers Using Fluidic Elastomer Actuators. , 2014, Soft robotics.

[20]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  N. Gershenfeld,et al.  Microfluidic Bubble Logic , 2006, Science.

[22]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[23]  L. Mullins Softening of Rubber by Deformation , 1969 .

[24]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Using explosions to power a soft robot. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[25]  Daniel M. Vogt,et al.  Embedded 3D Printing of Strain Sensors within Highly Stretchable Elastomers , 2014, Advanced materials.

[26]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Deformation in Soft-Matter Robotics: A Categorization and Quantitative Characterization , 2015, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[27]  J. Lewis,et al.  3D Bioprinting of Vascularized, Heterogeneous Cell‐Laden Tissue Constructs , 2014, Advanced materials.

[28]  Koichi Suzumori,et al.  Elastic materials producing compliant robots , 1996, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[29]  Benjamin Gorissen,et al.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of pneumatic balloon microactuators , 2011 .

[30]  Mark Horowitz,et al.  Static control logic for microfluidic devices using pressure-gain valves , 2010 .

[31]  Todd A. Gisby,et al.  Multi-functional dielectric elastomer artificial muscles for soft and smart machines , 2012 .

[32]  B. Mosadegh,et al.  Integrated Elastomeric Components for Autonomous Regulation of Sequential and Oscillatory Flow Switching in Microfluidic Devices , 2010, Nature physics.

[33]  Thomas J. Wallin,et al.  3D printing antagonistic systems of artificial muscle using projection stereolithography , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[34]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A Resilient, Untethered Soft Robot , 2014 .

[35]  J. Lewis,et al.  Omnidirectional Printing of 3D Microvascular Networks , 2011, Advanced materials.

[36]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion , 2015, Science.