Stochastic activation of a DNA damage response causes cell-to-cell mutation rate variation

To have or have not determines DNA repair Cells presumably try to protect DNA from damage at all costs. But Uphof et al. show that they do not, because the cost is too high. Single-molecule and single-cell measurements show that the DNA repair enzyme Ada, which also regulates its own expression, was present in such low amounts in E. coli that stochastic variation led to some cells having none of the protein at all. Such cells undergo increased mutagenesis, which could be beneficial in circumstances in which increased genetic heterogeneity is required for adaptation. The expression of large amounts of such a DNA-altering protein was also toxic. Science, this issue p. 1094 Nongenetic heterogeneity can lead to genetic variation. Cells rely on the precise action of proteins that detect and repair DNA damage. However, gene expression noise causes fluctuations in protein abundances that may compromise repair. For the Ada protein in Escherichia coli, which induces its own expression upon repairing DNA alkylation damage, we found that undamaged cells on average produce one Ada molecule per generation. Because production is stochastic, many cells have no Ada molecules and cannot induce the damage response until the first expression event occurs, which sometimes delays the response for generations. This creates a subpopulation of cells with increased mutation rates. Nongenetic variation in protein abundances thus leads to genetic heterogeneity in the population. Our results further suggest that cells balance reliable repair against toxic side effects of abundant DNA repair proteins.

[1]  B. Sedgwick Repairing DNA-methylation damage , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[2]  H. Mori,et al.  Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  G. Beslon,et al.  Chance at the heart of the cell. , 2012, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[4]  J. Biteen,et al.  Single-molecule motions and interactions in live cells reveal target search dynamics in mismatch repair , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[6]  James C. W. Locke,et al.  Stochastic Pulse Regulation in Bacterial Stress Response , 2011, Science.

[7]  Arkady B. Khodursky,et al.  Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[9]  P. Lemotte,et al.  Alteration of the carboxyl-terminal domain of Ada protein influences its inducibility, specificity, and strength as a transcriptional activator , 1988, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[11]  O. Kuipers,et al.  Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging in bacteria. , 2008, Annual review of microbiology.

[12]  U. Alon Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  Thomas M. Norman,et al.  Memory and Modularity in Cell-Fate Decision Making , 2013, Nature.

[14]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Mutation as a Stress Response and the Regulation of Evolvability , 2007, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[15]  D. Lane,et al.  Probing plasmid partition with centromere‐based incompatibility , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[16]  L. Christophorou Science , 2018, Emerging Dynamics: Science, Energy, Society and Values.

[17]  Andrew Wright,et al.  Robust Growth of Escherichia coli , 2010, Current Biology.

[18]  R. A. Kennedy,et al.  Forward-backward non-linear filtering technique for extracting small biological signals from noise , 1991, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  David Yadin,et al.  Defining the limits of single-molecule FRET resolution in TIRF microscopy. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[20]  E. Cox,et al.  Real-Time Kinetics of Gene Activity in Individual Bacteria , 2005, Cell.

[21]  L. Samson,et al.  A new pathway for DNA repair in Escherichia coli , 1977, Nature.

[22]  Visualizing Protein-DNA Interactions in Live Bacterial Cells Using Photoactivated Single-molecule Tracking , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[23]  K. Polyak,et al.  Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[24]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Single-molecule DNA repair in live bacteria , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Kirsten L. Frieda,et al.  A Stochastic Single-Molecule Event Triggers Phenotype Switching of a Bacterial Cell , 2008, Science.

[26]  A. Murray,et al.  Seeing Mutations in Living Cells , 2010, Current Biology.

[27]  B. Van Houten,et al.  Dynamics of lesion processing by bacterial nucleotide excision repair proteins. , 2012, Progress in molecular biology and translational science.

[28]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Supplemental Information The Transcription Factor Titration Effect Dictates Level of Gene Expression , 2014 .

[29]  D. Dubnau,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression Determines Cell Fate in Bacillus subtilis , 2007, Science.

[30]  O. Sliusarenko,et al.  High‐throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio‐temporal dynamics , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[31]  Stephan Uphoff,et al.  Studying the organization of DNA repair by single-cell and single-molecule imaging , 2014, DNA repair.

[32]  David H Burkhardt,et al.  Quantifying Absolute Protein Synthesis Rates Reveals Principles Underlying Allocation of Cellular Resources , 2014, Cell.

[33]  U. Alon,et al.  A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli , 2006, Nature Methods.

[34]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Stoichiometry and Architecture of Active DNA Replication Machinery in Escherichia coli , 2010, Science.

[35]  B. Wanner,et al.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  G. Walker,et al.  The Ada protein acts as both a positive and a negative modulator of Escherichia coli's response to methylating agents. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  L. Samson,et al.  Balancing repair and tolerance of DNA damage caused by alkylating agents , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[38]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  High-density mapping of single-molecule trajectories with photoactivated localization microscopy , 2008, Nature Methods.

[39]  M. Volkert,et al.  Regulatory Responses of the Adaptive Response to Alkylation Damage: a Simple Regulon with Complex Regulatory Features , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.