Estimating Ambiguity Aversion in a Portfolio Choice Experiment

We report a laboratory experiment that enables us to estimate parametric models of ambiguity aversion at the level of the individual subject. We use two main specifications, a “kinked” specification that nests Maxmin Expected Utility, Choquet Expected Utility, α-Maxmin Expected Utility, and Contraction Expected Utility and a “smooth” specification that nests the various theories referred to collectively as Recursive Expected Utility. Our subjects solved a series of portfolio-choice problems. The assets are Arrow securities corresponding to three states of nature, where the probability of one state is known and the remaining two are ambiguous. The sample exhibits considerable heterogeneity in preferences, as captured by parameter estimates. Nonetheless, there exists a strong tendency to equalize the demands for the securities that pay off in the ambiguous states, a feature more easily accommodated by the kinked specification than by the smooth specification. We also find that a large number of subjects are well described by the ambiguity-neutral Subjective Expected Utility model.

[1]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior , 1989 .

[2]  Colin Camerer.  Individual Decision Making , 2020, The Handbook of Experimental Economics.

[3]  Haluk Ergin,et al.  A subjective theory of compound lotteries , 2003 .

[4]  Eddie Dekel.  An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom , 1986 .

[5]  Stephen G Bronars,et al.  The Power of Nonparametric Tests of Preference Maximization [The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis] , 1987 .

[6]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  GOODNESS-OF-FIT IN OPTIMIZING MODELS , 1989 .

[7]  Prices and Portfolio Choices in Financial Markets: Theory, Econometrics, Experiments , 2007 .

[8]  D. Schmeidler.  Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity , 1989 .

[9]  Thibault Gajdos,et al.  Attitude toward imprecise information , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[10]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[11]  Takashi Hayashi,et al.  Choice with imprecise information: an experimental approach , 2010 .

[12]  J. Quiggin.  A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[13]  Mark J. Machina,et al.  Risk, Ambiguity, and the Rank-Dependence Axioms , 2009 .

[14]  D. Ellsberg.  Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[15]  Wojciech Olszewski,et al.  Preferences Over Sets of Lotteries -super-1 , 2007 .

[16]  Wojciech Olszewski,et al.  Preferences over Sets of Lotteries , 2006 .

[17]  Uzi Segal,et al.  Two Stage Lotteries Without the Reduction Axiom , 1990 .

[18]  P. Samuelson.  Risk and uncertainty: a fallacy of large numbers , 1963 .

[19]  H. Varian.  Goodness of Fit for Revealed Preference Tests , 1994 .

[20]  Faruk Gul.  A Theory of Disappointment Aversion , 1991 .

[21]  H. Varian.  The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis , 1982 .

[22]  Laetitia Placido,et al.  Ambiguity models and the machina paradoxes , 2011 .

[23]  Paolo Ghirardato,et al.  Ambiguity in Asset Markets: Theory and Experiment , 2010 .

[24]  V. Feltkamp,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Aversion , 1999 .

[25]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[26]  Raphaël Giraud,et al.  Objective Imprecise Probabilistic Information, Second Order Beliefs and Ambiguity Aversion: an Axiomatization , 2005, ISIPTA.

[27]  Kyoungwon Seo,et al.  AMBIGUITY AND SECOND-ORDER BELIEF , 2009 .

[28]  John D. Hey,et al.  The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity , 2010, Experiments in Economics.

[29]  Uzi Segal,et al.  The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach , 1987 .

[30]  S. Afriat.  Efficiency Estimation of Production Function , 1972 .

[31]  Yoram Halevy.  Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study , 2005 .

[32]  H. Varian.  Non-parametric Tests of Consumer Behaviour , 1983 .

[33]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Revealing Preferences Graphically: An Old Method Gets a New Tool Kit , 2007 .

[34]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modelling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguitiy , 1991 .

[35]  M. Marinacci,et al.  A Smooth Model of Decision Making Under Ambiguity , 2003 .

[36]  F. Knight.  The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[37]  Robert F. Nau,et al.  Uncertainty Aversion with Second-Order Utilities and Probabilities , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[38]  David S. Ahn.  Ambiguity without a state space , 2004 .

[39]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility , 2000 .

[40]  Syngjoo Choi,et al.  Consistency and heterogeneity of individual behavior under uncertainty , 2007 .

[41]  Mohammed Abdellaoui,et al.  The Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation , 2011 .

[42]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .