What does integrated ecosystem assessment mean to policy-makers and scientists working in the Atlantic? Implications for ocean science diplomacy

An important goal of Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA) is to be an inclusive, evidence-based process to engage stakeholders, in support of ecosystem-based management. IEA is resource intensive, requiring the engagement of personnel, experts from many disciplines, public and private institutions, and including issues of technology, infrastructure, capacity building, etc. Stakeholders such as policy-makers and scientists in influential decision-making roles often determine the level of investment when committing to an IEA. It is thus critical to understand how these specific stakeholders understand and perceive IEA, as well as their motivations for engagement. We interviewed government officials, science managers and scientists whose decisions are critical for mobilizing resources (time, expertise and funding) in support of ecosystem based management (and potentially IEA) in the Atlantic Ocean. The interviews aimed at documenting their perceptions of IEA, and their motivations to engage in the process. Our results show that most of these research and policy stakeholders are generally unaware of, or have misconceptions about IEA concepts. Those who expressed awareness of IEA considered IEA as unfit to address most policy and managerial goals. We propose that the IEA process could be improved by promoting inclusivity and applying ocean science diplomacy. We see that these two aspects (inclusivity and science diplomacy) can help research and policy stakeholders understand the true meaning of IEA through negotiating, and by strengthening and diversifying the involvement of international stakeholders. We advocate that the scoping phase of an IEA is of critical importance and should be core to the whole process. It is during the scoping phase that stakeholders are identified and engaged. With their involvement, there is a need to make their interests visible and respected. During the scoping phase, a safe and open space needs to be secured, so these interests can be negotiated and mutual understanding on concepts, roles in the process and the possible outcomes are achieved. This article is part of the Mission Atlantic Project (Horizon 2020) which is designed to conduct IEAs in the Atlantic Ocean.

[1]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[2]  D. Roberts,et al.  The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate , 2022 .

[3]  P. Macnaghten,et al.  What’s wrong with global challenges? , 2021, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[4]  Ecosystem restoration for people, nature and climate , 2021 .

[5]  Andrei Polejack,et al.  The Importance of Ocean Science Diplomacy for Ocean Affairs, Global Sustainability, and the UN Decade of Ocean Science , 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[6]  M. Wisz,et al.  Atlantic Ocean science diplomacy in action: the pole-to-pole All Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance , 2021 .

[7]  S. Ranganathan Decolonization and International Law: Putting the Ocean on the Map , 2020, Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international.

[8]  J. V. van Tatenhove,et al.  Mechanisms of power in maritime spatial planning processes in Denmark , 2020 .

[9]  S. Gaichas,et al.  There Is no I in EAFM Adapting Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for Mid-Atlantic Fisheries Management , 2020 .

[10]  Kaisu Mustonen,et al.  Empowering her guardians to nurture our Ocean’s future , 2020, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[11]  Michael A. St. John,et al.  100 Opportunities for More Inclusive Ocean Research: Cross-Disciplinary Research Questions for Sustainable Ocean Governance and Management , 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[12]  M. Dickey‐Collas,et al.  Ocean Ecosystem-Based Management Mandates and Implementation in the North Atlantic , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[13]  M. Dickey‐Collas,et al.  Clarifying mandates for marine ecosystem-based management , 2018, ICES Journal of Marine Science.

[14]  S. Johansson,et al.  A five-step approach for stakeholder engagement in prioritisation and planning of environmental evidence syntheses , 2017, Environmental Evidence.

[15]  J. Nye Soft power: the origins and political progress of a concept , 2017, Palgrave Communications.

[16]  D. Simberloff,et al.  The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Rachel D. Long,et al.  Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management , 2015 .

[18]  Kirstin K. Holsman,et al.  Guidance for implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments: a US perspective , 2014 .

[19]  Christian Möllmann,et al.  Bringing integrated ecosystem assessments to real life: a scientific framework for ICES , 2014 .

[20]  M. Dickey‐Collas Why the complex nature of integrated ecosystem assessments requires a flexible and adaptive approach , 2014 .

[21]  Jameal F. Samhouri,et al.  Lessons learned from developing integrated ecosystem assessments to inform marine ecosystem-based management in the USA , 2014 .

[22]  David A. Welch,et al.  Understanding Global Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to Theory and History , 2013 .

[23]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners , 2013, QMiP Bulletin.

[24]  Matthias Bergmann,et al.  Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization , 2012 .

[25]  A. Furnham,et al.  A literature review of the anchoring effect , 2011 .

[26]  Phillip S. Levin,et al.  Bringing stakeholders, scientists, and managers together through an integrated ecosystem assessment process , 2010 .

[27]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change , 2009 .

[28]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[29]  Nina V Fedoroff,et al.  Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century , 2009, Cell.

[30]  P. Levin,et al.  Integrated Ecosystem Assessments: Developing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem-Based Management of the Ocean , 2009, PLoS biology.

[31]  S. Merriam,et al.  Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures , 2001 .

[32]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[33]  C. Harvey,et al.  Implementing “the IEA”: using integrated ecosystem assessment frameworks, programs, and applications in support of operationalizing ecosystem‐based management , 2017 .

[34]  L. Dodds,et al.  An approach for effective stakeholder engagement as an essential component of the ecosystem approach , 2017 .

[35]  JOSE G. VASCONCELOS,et al.  Two decades of inter-governmental collaboration: Three developing countries on the move towards ecosystem-based governance in the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem , 2016 .

[36]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .