Drug plasma monitoring in CML and GIST: A case-based discussion.

Drug plasma monitoring has emerged as an important tool to obtain optimal levels of a particular drug among individual patients. Plasma monitoring of imatinib levels would appear to be practical in cases where there is lack of response, heightened toxicity, or evidence of poor adherence to therapy. However, the potential role of monitoring plasma drug concentrations in guiding treatment decisions and optimizing patient therapy has yet to be established. Currently, there are no clinical recommendations regarding how to incorporate imatinib drug plasma monitoring in patients with either chronic myeloid leukemia or gastrointestinal stromal tumors, indications for which imatinib is approved. Here, the latest research and evidence regarding imatinib drug plasma monitoring is discussed. Three cases are presented to illustrate the most common examples where monitoring imatinib plasma concentrations may help to guide treatment decisions. These cases include a suboptimal response to imatinib treatment, lack of patient adherence to imatinib, and imatinib-related toxicity. By understanding the potential role of monitoring plasma imatinib concentrations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia or gastrointestinal stromal tumors, physicians can identify patients who may benefit from drug plasma monitoring and consider incorporating the data in order to improve patient outcomes.

[1]  G. Demetri,et al.  Soft tissue sarcoma. , 2010, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[2]  J. Cortes,et al.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation and blood-level testing in imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia , 2009, Leukemia.

[3]  G. Demetri,et al.  Imatinib plasma levels are correlated with clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  S. Geest,et al.  Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study. , 2009, Blood.

[5]  Tillmann Krahnke,et al.  Imatinib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with response and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the IRIS study. , 2008, Blood.

[6]  Nicholas Moore,et al.  Trough imatinib plasma levels are associated with both cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2007, Blood.

[7]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Molecular correlates of imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  H. Henk,et al.  Compliance and persistency with imatinib. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Tsang,et al.  Prescription compliance and persistency in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients (pts) on imatinib (IM). , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  J. Verweij,et al.  Imatinib pharmacokinetics in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective population pharmacokinetic study over time. EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group , 2005, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[12]  M. Egorin,et al.  Effect of St John's Wort on imatinib mesylate pharmacokinetics , 2004, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[13]  R. Capdeville,et al.  Pharmacokinetic interaction between ketoconazole and imatinib mesylate (Glivec) in healthy subjects , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[14]  B. Dörken,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and cellular uptake of imatinib and its main metabolite CGP74588 , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[15]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Zucchetti,et al.  α1 Acid Glycoprotein Binds to Imatinib (STI571) and Substantially Alters Its Pharmacokinetics in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients , 2003 .

[17]  O. S. Nielsen,et al.  Exatecan in pretreated adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: results of a phase II--study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[18]  John Urquhart,et al.  Role of Patient Compliance in Clinical Pharmacokinetics , 1994 .

[19]  Peter Lloyd,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib , 2005, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[20]  M. Zucchetti,et al.  Alpha1 acid glycoprotein binds to imatinib (STI571) and substantially alters its pharmacokinetics in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[21]  J Urquhart,et al.  Role of patient compliance in clinical pharmacokinetics. A review of recent research. , 1994, Clinical pharmacokinetics.