Identification and validation of a gene expression signature that predicts outcome in adult men with germ cell tumors.

PURPOSE Germ cell tumor (GCT) is the most common malignancy in young adult men. Currently, patients are risk-stratified on the basis of clinical presentation and serum tumor markers. The introduction of molecular markers could improve outcome prediction. PATIENTS AND METHODS Expression profiling was performed on 74 nonseminomatous GCTs (NSGCTs) from cisplatin-treated patients (ie, training set) and on 34 similarly treated patients with NSGCTs (ie, validation set). A gene classifier was developed by using prediction analysis for microarrays (PAM) for the binary end point of 5-year overall survival (OS). A predictive score was developed for OS by using the univariate Cox model. RESULTS In the training set, PAM identified 140 genes that predicted 5-year OS (cross-validated classification rate, 60%). The PAM model correctly classified 90% of patients in the validation set. Patients predicted to have good outcome had significantly longer survival than those with poor predicted outcome (P < .001). For the OS end point, a 10-gene model had a predictive accuracy (ie, concordance index) of 0.66 in the training set and a concordance index of 0.83 in the validation set. Dichotomization of the samples on the basis of the median score resulted in significant differences in survival (P = .002). For both end points, the gene-based predictor was an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate model that included clinical risk stratification (P < .01 for both). CONCLUSION We have identified gene expression signatures that accurately predict outcome in patients with GCTs. These predictive genes should be useful for the prediction of patient outcome and could provide novel targets for therapeutic intervention.

[1]  S. Heath,et al.  Expression profiling of lineage differentiation in pluripotential human embryonal carcinoma cells. , 2002, Cell growth & differentiation : the molecular biology journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[2]  N. Geller,et al.  Adjunctive surgery after chemotherapy for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: recommendations for patient selection. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  T. Ulbright Germ Cell Neoplasms of the Testis , 1993, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[4]  May D. Wang,et al.  GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data , 2003, Genome Biology.

[5]  David E. Misek,et al.  Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[6]  W. Voigt,et al.  Loss of Oct-3/4 Expression in Embryonal Carcinoma Cells Is Associated with Induction of Cisplatin Resistance , 2006, Tumor Biology.

[7]  N. Geller,et al.  A randomized trial of etoposide + cisplatin versus vinblastine + bleomycin + cisplatin + cyclophosphamide + dactinomycin in patients with good-prognosis germ cell tumors. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  J. Bacik,et al.  Relapse-free and overall survival in patients with pathologic stage II nonseminomatous germ cell cancer treated with etoposide and cisplatin adjuvant chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  D. Fitch,et al.  Rearrangement of Immunoglobulin Genes in Shark Germ Cells , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  H. Hwang,et al.  gas7: A gene expressed preferentially in growth-arrested fibroblasts and terminally differentiated Purkinje neurons affects neurite formation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A. Olshen,et al.  Gene expression-based classification of nonseminomatous male germ cell tumors , 2005, Oncogene.

[12]  R. Motzer,et al.  Phase III randomized trial of conventional-dose chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell rescue as first-line treatment for patients with poor-prognosis metastatic germ cell tumors. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  J. Bacik,et al.  Cluster analysis of p53 and Ki67 expression, apoptosis, alpha-fetoprotein, and human chorionic gonadotrophin indicates a favorable prognostic subgroup within the embryonal carcinoma germ cell tumor. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  R. Motzer,et al.  Testicular germ-cell cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. S. Young,et al.  Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Value Adjustment , 1993 .

[16]  K. Mikoshiba,et al.  Physical and Functional Interactions between Zic and Gli Proteins* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Michael J. Birrer,et al.  Identification of molecular markers and signaling pathway in endometrial cancer in Hong Kong Chinese women by genome-wide gene expression profiling , 2007, Oncogene.

[18]  J. Bacik,et al.  Etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic good-risk germ cell tumors. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  C. Cordon-Cardo,et al.  Tumor suppressor role for myopodin in bladder cancer: loss of nuclear expression of myopodin is cell-cycle dependent and predicts clinical outcome , 2003, Oncogene.

[20]  Rafael A Irizarry,et al.  Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[21]  P M Bossuyt,et al.  Genes differentially expressed in medulloblastoma and fetal brain. , 1999, Physiological genomics.

[22]  J. Sheinfeld,et al.  The role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the management of testicular cancer. , 2004, Urologic oncology.

[23]  N. Geller,et al.  Randomized trial of etoposide and cisplatin versus etoposide and carboplatin in patients with good-risk germ cell tumors: a multiinstitutional study. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  A. Olshen,et al.  Down-regulation of stem cell genes, including those in a 200-kb gene cluster at 12p13.31, is associated with in vivo differentiation of human male germ cell tumors. , 2006, Cancer research.

[25]  P. Wilkinson,et al.  International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  A. Olshen,et al.  In vivo differentiation and genomic evolution in adult male germ cell tumors , 2008, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[27]  Lee L. Rubin,et al.  Targeting the Hedgehog pathway in cancer , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[28]  Yan Ping Yu,et al.  Myopodin-mediated suppression of prostate cancer cell migration involves interaction with zyxin. , 2006, Cancer research.

[29]  G. Fishell,et al.  Morphogen to mitogen: the multiple roles of hedgehog signalling in vertebrate neural development , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Richard Sylvester,et al.  International germ cell consensus classification: A prognostic factor-erased staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers , 1997 .

[32]  Jean YH Yang,et al.  Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics , 2004, Genome Biology.

[33]  O. Cummings,et al.  Gene Expression Profiling of Early- and Late-Relapse Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of the Testis , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[34]  J. Masters,et al.  Curing metastatic cancer: lessons from testicular germ-cell tumours , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  A. Roopra,et al.  The Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Protein, SHARP-1, Represses Transcription by a Histone Deacetylase-dependent and Histone Deacetylase-independent Mechanism* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.