Within- and Between- CoP Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge-Intensive Firms

Knowledge is an important source of competitive advantage in knowledge-intensive firms. However, these firms experience problems in sharing tacit knowledge. Communities of practice (CoPs) are viewed as effective mechanisms to enable knowledge sharing through an emphasis on learning rather than structural imperatives. This chapter investigates knowledge sharing withinand betweenCoPs in knowledge-intensive firms. Knowledge sharing in CoPs is influenced by a multiplicity of factors which we categorised as cognitive, relational and structural. Data collected from 40 members of eight CoPs support the view that knowledge sharing occurs more effectively within CoPs rather than between them. Such knowledge sharing is context driven and strongly dependent on shared mindsets, relationships and networks. We explore the implications for both researching CoPs and the facilitation of CoPs in knowledge-intensive firms.

[1]  M. Klein.  Information politics , 1985 .

[2]  L. Zucker.  Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[3]  D. Chavis,et al.  Sense of community: A definition and theory , 1986 .

[4]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[5]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[6]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[7]  Donald R. Lessard,et al.  Breaking the silos : Distributed knowledge and strategic responses to volatile exchange rates , 1996 .

[8]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[9]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[10]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[11]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations , 1998 .

[12]  Judith Jordan,et al.  Knowledge orientations and team effectiveness , 1998 .

[13]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[14]  Leigh Weiss.  COLLECTION AND CONNECTION: THE ANATOMY OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FIRMS. , 1999 .

[15]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing , 1999 .

[16]  S. Pan,et al.  Knowledge Management in Practice: An Exploratory Case Study , 1999 .

[17]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[18]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[19]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[20]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Building an innovation factory. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[21]  B. Delahaye,et al.  Influences On Knowledge processes In Organizational Learning: The Psychosocial Filter , 2000 .

[22]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[23]  J. Storck,et al.  Knowledge Diffusion through “Strategic Communities” , 2000 .

[24]  Alice Lam.  Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework , 2000 .

[25]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[27]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[28]  L. Chung.  THE ROLE OF MANAGEMENT IN KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER , 2001 .

[29]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization , 2001 .

[30]  M. Schulz.  THE UNCERTAIN RELEVANCE OF NEWNESS: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS , 2001 .

[31]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[32]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  What is Organizational Knowledge , 2001 .

[33]  L. Empson.  Fear of Exploitation and Fear of Contamination: Impediments to Knowledge Transfer in Mergers between Professional Service Firms , 2001 .

[34]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[35]  Stephen Gourlay,et al.  Knowledge management and HRD , 2001 .

[36]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Communities of practice and organizational performance , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[37]  G. Farris,et al.  Knowledge Management in Research and Development , 2001 .

[38]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Intentional social action in virtual communities , 2002 .

[39]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[40]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[41]  Joel O. Iverson,et al.  Knowledge Management in Communities of Practice , 2002 .

[42]  Won-Seok Yoo,et al.  Exploring the Factors Enhancing Member Participation in Virtual Communities , 2002, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[43]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  The duality of knowledge , 2002, Inf. Res..

[44]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[45]  Matti Vartiainen,et al.  Communities and other social structures for knowledge sharing: a case study in an internet consultancy company , 2003 .

[46]  M. Ipe.  Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2003 .

[47]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[49]  R. Coff,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties that Split Pies , 2003 .

[50]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Joon Koh,et al.  Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  Yeo Ming Mei,et al.  Formulating a Communication Strategy for Effective Knowledge Sharing , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[53]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[54]  A. Malmberg,et al.  (How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? , 2005 .

[55]  Michaela Trippl,et al.  Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links , 2006 .

[56]  S. Frenkel,et al.  Managing people where people really matter: the management of human resources in biotech companies , 2006 .

[57]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[58]  Aimée Hoeve,et al.  Communities of practice as stimulating forces for collective learning , 2006 .

[59]  Alexandra Durcikova,et al.  The Role of Knowledge Repositories in Technical Support Environments: Speed Versus Learning in User Performance , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Thorsten Teichert,et al.  The creation of social and intellectual capital in virtual communities of practice: shaping social structure in virtual communities of practice , 2006 .

[61]  M. Ford,et al.  Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing in Information Technology Projects , 2006 .

[62]  C. Steyn,et al.  Towards the development of a knowledge management practices survey for application in knowledge intensive organisations , 2008 .

[63]  Pi-Sheng Deng,et al.  Applying a Market-Based Approach to the Development of a Sharing-Enabled KM Model for Knowledge-Intensive Small Firms , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[64]  Seng-cho Timothy Chou,et al.  Using peer-to-peer technology for knowledge sharing in communities of practices , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[65]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and -seeking beliefs , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[66]  Annick Willem,et al.  Knowledge sharing in inter-unit cooperative episodes: The impact of organizational structure dimensions , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..