THE DATIVE ALTERNATION IN GERMAN-ENGLISH INTERLANGUAGE

This study investigates the role of probabilistic grammatical constraints on the dative alternation in English as a second language (ESL). It presents the results of an experiment in which the different factors that are influential in first language (L1) English are tested with advanced learners of English whose L1 is German. Second language (L2) learners are influenced by the same determinants as L1 speakers but to a lesser degree. Together with the results of previous studies, the present results suggest that, initially, the learners do not make use of probabilistic constraints in spite of the constraints being influential in the L1 and only gradually acquire a sensitivity toward the constraints that govern the choice between the two dative constructions.

[1]  L. Uyechi,et al.  Reality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern Interaction in Language & Life , 2008 .

[2]  Thomas Wasow.  End-Weight from the Speaker's Perspective , 1997 .

[3]  Thomas Wasov,et al.  Postverbal behavior , 2002, CSLI lecture notes series.

[4]  Irene Mazurkewich,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF THE DATIVE ALTERNATION BY SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY , 1984 .

[5]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  A RECONSIDERATION OF DATIVE MOVEMENTS , 1971 .

[6]  Vsevolod Kapatsinski,et al.  What is grammar like? A usage-based constructionist perspective , 2014, LILT.

[7]  Shigenori Tanaka.  The Selective Use of Specific Exemplars in Second-Language Performance: The Case of The Dative Alternation* , 1987 .

[8]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy , 2003 .

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  Maik Walter,et al.  Argument Realisation, Information Status and Syntactic Weight … A Learner-Corpus Study of the Dative Alternation , 2008 .

[11]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech , 2009, Language and Cognition.

[12]  Britta Mondorf.  More Support for More -Support , 2009 .

[13]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[14]  Maria Paola Tenchini.  Word order in German: A corpus study , 2010 .

[16]  Irene Mazurkewich,et al.  Syntactic Markedness and Language Acquisition , 1985, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Semantic and Pragmatic Conditions for the Dative Alternation , 2004 .

[18]  Richard Thomas Oehrle,et al.  The grammatical status of the English dative alternation , 1976 .

[19]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[20]  J. Bresnan.  Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic ? Experiments with the English dative alternation ∗ , 2006 .

[21]  Ka Cormier,et al.  Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America , 2004 .

[22]  Britta Mondorf.  More Support for ‘More’-Support: The Role of Processing Constraints on the Choice between Synthetic and Analytic Comparative Forms , 2005 .

[23]  John J. Godfrey,et al.  SWITCHBOARD: telephone speech corpus for research and development , 1992, [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[24]  Manfred Pienemann,et al.  Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory , 2005 .

[25]  Gisela Håkansson,et al.  Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing , 2002 .

[26]  H. Holling.  Suppressor Structures in the General Linear Model , 1983 .

[27]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2001 .

[28]  H. Marefat.  The Impact of Information Structure as a Discourse Factor on the Acquisition of Dative Alternation by L2 Learners , 2005 .

[29]  G. Rohdenburg.  Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English , 1996 .

[30]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[31]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[32]  I. Krämer,et al.  Cognitive foundations of interpretation , 2007 .

[33]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English , 2010 .

[34]  J. Bresnan,et al.  The Gradience of the Dative Alternation , 2008 .

[35]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[36]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Beta Regression for Modelling Rates and Proportions , 2004 .

[37]  Robert Dixon,et al.  Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages , 1980 .

[38]  Lou Boves,et al.  On the difficulty of making concreteness concrete , 2011 .

[39]  R. Jackendoff.  Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon , 1975 .

[40]  W. D. Davies.  English Dative Alternation and Evidence for a Thematic Strategy in Adult SLA , 1994 .

[41]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Soft Constraints Mirror Hard Constraints: Voice and Person in English and Lummi , 2002 .

[42]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[43]  Peter Collins.  The indirect object construction in English: an informational approach , 1995 .

[44]  Bas Aarts,et al.  English Syntax And Argumentation , 1997 .

[45]  Betty Le Compagnon.  Interference and Overgeneralization in Second Language Learning: The Acquisition of English Dative Verbs by Native Speakers of French. , 1984 .

[46]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[47]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of give in New Zealand and American English , 2008 .

[48]  Bas Aarts,et al.  Syntactic gradience : the nature of grammatical indeterminacy , 2007 .

[49]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model , 1996 .

[50]  Lars Konieczny,et al.  Acquiring English dative verbs: proficiency effects in German L2 learners , 2011, CogSci.

[51]  Shuangzhe Liu,et al.  Regression diagnostics , 2020, Applied Quantitative Analysis for Real Estate.

[52]  Kim McDonough,et al.  INTERACTION AND SYNTACTIC PRIMING: English L2 Speakers' Production of Dative Constructions , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[53]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[54]  D. Theijssen,et al.  On the difficulty of making concreteness concrete , 2011 .

[55]  Joseph E. Emonds,et al.  A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving, and Local Transformations , 1978 .

[56]  C. Fillmore.  Indirect Object Constructions In English And The Ordering Of Transformations , 1965 .

[57]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base , 2007 .

[58]  Lynn Friedman,et al.  Graphical Views of Suppression and Multicollinearity in Multiple Linear Regression , 2005 .

[59]  Ll Sabourin,et al.  Language processing and second language development: Processability theory , 2000 .

[60]  Lan-Hsin Chang,et al.  Discourse Effects on EFL Learners' Production of Dative Constructions , 2004 .

[61]  Jürgen Lenerz,et al.  Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen , 1977 .

[62]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[63]  Gary D. Prideaux,et al.  The effect of context on dative position , 1979 .

[64]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[65]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi,et al.  Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: a multivariate analysis of tagged corpora , 2007, English Language and Linguistics.

[66]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency , 2014 .

[67]  Daniel Biiring,et al.  What Do Definites Do That Indefinites Definitely Don't? , 2001 .

[68]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change , 2013 .

[69]  Shunji Inagaki,et al.  Japanese and Chinese Learners' Acquisition of the Narrow‐Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English , 1997 .

[70]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1991 .

[71]  Roger Hawkins,et al.  Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers , 1987 .