Numerical simulation of magnetite segregation in a dense medium cyclone

Numerical simulations of turbulent driven flow in a dense medium cyclone with magnetite medium have been conducted using Fluent. The predicted air core shape and diameter were found to be close to the experimental results measured by gamma ray tomography. It is possible that the Large eddy simulation (LES) turbulence model with Mixture multi-phase model can be used to predict the air/slurry interface accurately although the LES may need a finer grid. Multi-phase simulations (air/water/medium) are showing appropriate medium segregation effects but are over-predicting the level of segregation compared to that measured by gamma-ray tomography in particular with over prediction of medium concentrations near the wall. Further, investigated the accurate prediction of axial segregation of magnetite using the LES turbulence model together with the multi-phase mixture model and viscosity corrections according to the feed particle loading factor. Addition of lift forces and viscosity correction improved the predictions especially near the wall. Predicted density profiles are very close to gamma ray tomography data showing a clear density drop near the wall. The effect of size distribution of the magnetite has been fully studied. It is interesting to note that the ultra-fine magnetite sizes (i.e. 2 and 7 mu m) are distributed uniformly throughout the cyclone. As the size of magnetite increases, more segregation of magnetite occurs close to the wall. The cut-density (d(50)) of the magnetite segregation is 32 gm, which is expected with superfine magnetite feed size distribution. At higher feed densities the agreement between the [Dungilson, 1999; Wood, J.C., 1990. A performance model for coal-washing dense medium cyclones, Ph.D. Thesis, JKMRC, University of Queensland] correlations and the CFD are reasonably good, but the overflow density is lower than the model predictions. It is believed that the excessive underflow volumetric flow rates are responsible for under prediction of the overflow density. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  E. M. Sevilla,et al.  The fluid dynamics of hydrocyclones , 1997 .

[2]  M. Manninen,et al.  On the mixture model for multiphase flow , 1996 .

[3]  Raj K. Rajamani,et al.  Fluid-Flow Model of the Hydrocyclone for Concentrated Slurry Classification , 1992 .

[4]  F. Boysan,et al.  Advances in Cyclone Modelling Using Unstructured Grids , 2000 .

[5]  Raj K. Rajamani,et al.  A comparative study of three turbulence-closure models for the hydrocyclone problem , 2005 .

[6]  B. Launder,et al.  Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF LARGE EDDY SIMULATIONS OF A HYDROCYCLONE , 2004 .

[8]  R. Sripriya,et al.  CFD modelling of hydrocyclone—prediction of cut size , 2005 .

[9]  Jonathan James Davis.  A study of coal washing dense medium cyclones , 1987 .

[10]  Tomasz Dyakowski,et al.  Prediction of high solids concentration regions within a hydrocyclone , 1996 .

[11]  M. S. Brennan,et al.  Multiphase CFD simulations of dense medium and classifying hydrocyclones , 2003 .

[12]  Liang-Yin Chu,et al.  Research on the Motion of Solid Particles in a Hydrocyclone , 1993 .

[13]  R. X. Rong,et al.  Computational fluid dynamic simulation of dense medium cyclones , 2002 .

[14]  Ic Shepherd,et al.  Validation of a CFD model for predicting gas flow in a cyclone , 1999 .

[15]  Lin Ma,et al.  NUMERICAL MODELLING OF THE FLUID AND PARTICLE PENETRATION THROUGH SMALL SAMPLING CYCLONES , 2000 .

[16]  C. J. Restarick,et al.  The effect of underflow/overflow ratio on dense medium cyclone operation , 1991 .

[17]  Tomasz Dyakowski,et al.  The hydrodynamics of a hydrocyclone based on a three-dimensional multi-continuum model , 2000 .

[18]  S M Fraser,et al.  Computational and experimental investigations in a cyclone dust separator , 1997 .

[19]  Charles A. Petty,et al.  Flow predictions within hydrocyclones , 2001 .

[20]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Two-fluid model and hydrodynamic constitutive relations , 1984 .

[21]  P. Saffman.  The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow , 1965, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  Kevin P. Galvin,et al.  Use of X-rays to determine the distribution of particles in an operating cyclone , 1994 .

[23]  Martha Salcudean,et al.  A Numerical Simulation of Hydrocyclones , 1999 .

[24]  T. Napier-Munn,et al.  Towards a new understanding of the cyclone separator , 2003 .

[25]  T. Gatski,et al.  Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  Andrzej F. Nowakowski,et al.  Application of CFD to modelling of the flow in hydrocyclones: Is this a realizable option or still a research challenge? , 2004 .

[27]  Janusz S. Laskowski,et al.  Effect of dense medium properties on the separation performance of a dense medium cyclone , 1994 .

[28]  Christopher John Wood.  A performance model for coal-washing dense medium cyclones , 1990 .

[29]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .

[30]  Andrzej F. Nowakowski,et al.  Investigation of Swirling Flow Structure in Hydrocyclones , 2003 .

[31]  Manfred Piesche,et al.  Investigations on the flow and separation behaviour of hydrocyclones using computational fluid dynamics , 2004 .

[32]  J. C. Cullivan,et al.  Understanding the hydrocyclone separator through computational fluid dynamics , 2003 .