Binocular vision enhances a rapidly evolving affordance priming effect: Behavioural and TMS evidence
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G WESTHEIMER,et al. Factors influencing accommodation responses of the human eye. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.
[2] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[3] James J. Gibson,et al. The Information Available in Pictures , 1971 .
[4] R. C. Oldfield. THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .
[5] J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .
[6] L. Mulder,et al. Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[7] E. Johnston. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.
[8] Melvyn A. Goodale,et al. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis , 1992, Vision Research.
[9] N. Chino,et al. Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on motor evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain , 1993, 1993 IEEE Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference.
[10] M. A. Goodale,et al. The drawing of objects by a visual form agnosic: Contribution of surface properties and memorial representations , 1993, Neuropsychologia.
[11] M. Goodale,et al. The visual brain in action , 1995 .
[12] M. Landy,et al. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.
[13] J J Marotta,et al. The development of adaptive head movements following enucleation , 1995, Eye.
[14] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Evidence for visuomotor priming effect , 1996, Neuroreport.
[15] H. Sakata,et al. The TINS Lecture The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.
[16] S. Jackson,et al. A Kinematic Analysis of Goal-directed Prehension Movements Executed under Binocular, Monocular, and Memory-guided Viewing Conditions , 1997 .
[17] M. A. Goodale,et al. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.
[18] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.
[19] C. de’Sperati,et al. Recognizing the motion of a graspable object is guided by handedness , 1997, Neuroreport.
[20] M. Eimer,et al. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[21] Martin Eimer,et al. The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes , 1998 .
[22] U. Castiello,et al. Prehension movements and perceived object depth structure , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[23] R. Ellis,et al. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[24] D R Proffitt,et al. Seeing Big Things: Overestimation of Heights is Greater for Real Objects Than for Objects in Pictures , 1999, Perception.
[25] R. J. Seitz,et al. A fronto‐parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI‐study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.
[26] U. Castiello. Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[27] R. Ellis,et al. Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.
[28] J T Mordkoff,et al. Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: a comparison of available methods and procedures. , 2000, Psychophysiology.
[29] Simon J Watt,et al. Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[30] Alex Martin,et al. Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.
[31] R. Ellis,et al. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .
[32] Sarah H. Creem,et al. Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] Luciano Fadiga,et al. Visuomotor Priming , 2001 .
[34] S. Anderson,et al. Attentional processes link perception and action , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[35] R. Ward,et al. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation , 2002 .
[36] Luciano Fadiga,et al. Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[37] M. Gentilucci. Object motor representation and reaching–grasping control , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[38] R. Passingham,et al. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.
[39] M. Goodale,et al. Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[40] M. Mon-Williams,et al. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[41] James M. Hillis,et al. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. , 2004, Journal of vision.
[42] H. Kornhuber,et al. Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale , 1965, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.
[43] Simon Grant,et al. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.
[44] David C Knill,et al. Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.
[45] David C. Knill,et al. Integrating visual cues for motor control: A matter of time , 2005, Vision Research.
[46] P. Cisek. Integrated Neural Processes for Defining Potential Actions and Deciding between Them: A Computational Model , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[47] Whitman Richards,et al. Stereopsis and stereoblindness , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.
[48] M. Goodale,et al. FMRI Reveals a Dissociation between Grasping and Perceiving the Size of Real 3D Objects , 2007, PloS one.
[49] Simon Grant,et al. Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.
[50] Jody C. Culham,et al. Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp? , 2007, NeuroImage.
[51] Paul Cisek,et al. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[52] Simon Grant,et al. Prehension deficits in amblyopia. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[53] Ed Symes,et al. Visual object affordances: object orientation. , 2007, Acta psychologica.
[54] L. Riggio,et al. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[55] Umberto Castiello,et al. The Cortical Control of Visually Guided Grasping , 2008, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.
[56] Ivan Toni,et al. Perceptuo-Motor Interactions during Prehension Movements , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[57] Joanne E McEntee. Information is available , 2008 .
[58] Hal S. Greenwald,et al. Cue integration outside central fixation: a study of grasping in depth. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[59] Luigi Cattaneo,et al. Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[60] M. Morgan,et al. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[61] Laurie M Wilcox,et al. A reevaluation of the tolerance to vertical misalignment in stereopsis. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[62] G. Vingerhoets,et al. Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances , 2009, Brain and Cognition.
[63] Rolf Verleger,et al. On how the motor cortices resolve an inter‐hemispheric response conflict: an event‐related EEG potential‐guided TMS study of the flankers task , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.
[64] D. Melmoth,et al. The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[65] R. Proctor,et al. The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[66] L. Deouell,et al. ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object–scene processing , 2010, Neuropsychologia.
[67] Jennifer E. Snyder-Cappione,et al. A Comprehensive Ex Vivo Functional Analysis of Human NKT Cells Reveals Production of MIP1-α and MIP1-β, a Lack of IL-17, and a Th1-Bias in Males , 2010, PloS one.
[68] S. Watt,et al. Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: No evidence for a binocular specialism , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[69] Alice Mado Proverbio,et al. 250ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[70] K. Yarrow,et al. Viewing objects and planning actions: On the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects , 2011, Brain and Cognition.
[71] M. Costantini,et al. The space of affordances: A TMS study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[72] S. Pardhan,et al. Target Contrast Affects Reaching and Grasping in the Visually Impaired Subjects , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.
[73] K. Yarrow,et al. The Truth-Telling Motor Cortex: Response Competition in M1 Discloses Deceptive Behaviour , 2011, Biological Psychology.
[74] Kielan Yarrow,et al. Single-pulse TMS related syncopal spell in a healthy subject , 2012, Brain Stimulation.