Binocular vision enhances a rapidly evolving affordance priming effect: Behavioural and TMS evidence

[1]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Factors influencing accommodation responses of the human eye. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  James J. Gibson,et al.  The Information Available in Pictures , 1971 .

[4]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[5]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[6]  L. Mulder,et al.  Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  E. Johnston Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[8]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis , 1992, Vision Research.

[9]  N. Chino,et al.  Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on motor evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain , 1993, 1993 IEEE Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference.

[10]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  The drawing of objects by a visual form agnosic: Contribution of surface properties and memorial representations , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[12]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[13]  J J Marotta,et al.  The development of adaptive head movements following enucleation , 1995, Eye.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Evidence for visuomotor priming effect , 1996, Neuroreport.

[15]  H. Sakata,et al.  The TINS Lecture The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  S. Jackson,et al.  A Kinematic Analysis of Goal-directed Prehension Movements Executed under Binocular, Monocular, and Memory-guided Viewing Conditions , 1997 .

[17]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.

[19]  C. de’Sperati,et al.  Recognizing the motion of a graspable object is guided by handedness , 1997, Neuroreport.

[20]  M. Eimer,et al.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes , 1998 .

[22]  U. Castiello,et al.  Prehension movements and perceived object depth structure , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Seeing Big Things: Overestimation of Heights is Greater for Real Objects Than for Objects in Pictures , 1999, Perception.

[25]  R. J. Seitz,et al.  A fronto‐parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI‐study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  U. Castiello Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[28]  J T Mordkoff,et al.  Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: a comparison of available methods and procedures. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Simon J Watt,et al.  Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[31]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[32]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Visuomotor Priming , 2001 .

[34]  S. Anderson,et al.  Attentional processes link perception and action , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  R. Ward,et al.  S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation , 2002 .

[36]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  M. Gentilucci Object motor representation and reaching–grasping control , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  R. Passingham,et al.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  M. Goodale,et al.  Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[42]  H. Kornhuber,et al.  Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale , 1965, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[43]  Simon Grant,et al.  Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  David C Knill,et al.  Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[45]  David C. Knill,et al.  Integrating visual cues for motor control: A matter of time , 2005, Vision Research.

[46]  P. Cisek Integrated Neural Processes for Defining Potential Actions and Deciding between Them: A Computational Model , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Whitman Richards,et al.  Stereopsis and stereoblindness , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  M. Goodale,et al.  FMRI Reveals a Dissociation between Grasping and Perceiving the Size of Real 3D Objects , 2007, PloS one.

[49]  Simon Grant,et al.  Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[51]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Simon Grant,et al.  Prehension deficits in amblyopia. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[53]  Ed Symes,et al.  Visual object affordances: object orientation. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[54]  L. Riggio,et al.  The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[55]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  The Cortical Control of Visually Guided Grasping , 2008, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[56]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Perceptuo-Motor Interactions during Prehension Movements , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Joanne E McEntee Information is available , 2008 .

[58]  Hal S. Greenwald,et al.  Cue integration outside central fixation: a study of grasping in depth. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[59]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  M. Morgan,et al.  Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[61]  Laurie M Wilcox,et al.  A reevaluation of the tolerance to vertical misalignment in stereopsis. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[62]  G. Vingerhoets,et al.  Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[63]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  On how the motor cortices resolve an inter‐hemispheric response conflict: an event‐related EEG potential‐guided TMS study of the flankers task , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[64]  D. Melmoth,et al.  The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[65]  R. Proctor,et al.  The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  L. Deouell,et al.  ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object–scene processing , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[67]  Jennifer E. Snyder-Cappione,et al.  A Comprehensive Ex Vivo Functional Analysis of Human NKT Cells Reveals Production of MIP1-α and MIP1-β, a Lack of IL-17, and a Th1-Bias in Males , 2010, PloS one.

[68]  S. Watt,et al.  Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: No evidence for a binocular specialism , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  250ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[70]  K. Yarrow,et al.  Viewing objects and planning actions: On the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[71]  M. Costantini,et al.  The space of affordances: A TMS study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  S. Pardhan,et al.  Target Contrast Affects Reaching and Grasping in the Visually Impaired Subjects , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[73]  K. Yarrow,et al.  The Truth-Telling Motor Cortex: Response Competition in M1 Discloses Deceptive Behaviour , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[74]  Kielan Yarrow,et al.  Single-pulse TMS related syncopal spell in a healthy subject , 2012, Brain Stimulation.