Wooden building products in comparative LCA

Background, Aim and ScopeWe revised the results of approx. 20 years of international research on the environmental impact of the life cycle of wood products used in the building sector compared to functionally equivalent products from other materials.Main FeaturesOriginal studies either technical reports or scientific papers in English or German were considered. This literature was obtained via an extensive literature review (February 2006), via a consultation of compilations of life cycle assessments (LCA) of wood products (e.g. elaborated during the COST action E9) and from secondary literature. The resulting list of literature is considered to be quite complete and therefore covers the most relevant original comparative LCA studies of wood products in the building sector in Europe, Northern America and Australia. The documentation of the studies differs considerably in terms of completeness (life cycle stages included, assessment methods), transparency (description of methodological assumptions, characteristics of the products, available data, etc.) and scientific rigor (e.g. related to the functional equivalency). All encountered original studies are cited and their scope and transparency is shortly described. For the environmental ranking of wood products compared to functionally equivalent products, only quantitative, transparently described studies with no obvious methodological flaws were included, preferably covering the whole life cycle and conducted according to the ISO series of standards 14’040ff. For the assessment, the contribution of each product to an impact category was compared to the mean of all functionally equivalent products included in a study.Results and DiscussionAmong the most important results are: fossil fuel consumption, potential contributions to the greenhouse effect and quantities of solid waste tend to be minor for wood products compared to competing products; impregnated wood products tend to be more critical than comparative products with respect to toxicological effects and/or photosmog depending on the type of preservative; incineration of wood products can cause higher impacts of acidification and eutrophication than other products, whereas thermal energy can be recovered; although composed wood products such as particle board or fibreboard make use of a larger share of wood of a tree compared to products out of solid wood, there is a high consumption of fossil energy associated with the production of fibres and particles/chips as well as with the production of glues, resins, etc. In LCAs of whole buildings, the materials used outside the areas of applicability of wood dominate the environmental profile of the building; current methods used for the impact assessment do not allow to consider (also favourable) impacts of forests, such as land occupation, impacts on biodiversity, purification of air, etc.ConclusionsWood products that have been installed and are used in an appropriate way tend to have a favourable environmental profile compared to functionally equivalent products from other materials. For the dispersion and application of these conclusions, it is necessary to adapt LCA to a form, which can be used on a regular basis for the decision making of different actors in the construction sector.PerspectivesLCA methodology in general (the series of standards ISO 14’040ff) and for the environmental assessment of wood products in particular have been developed and consolidated considerably in Europe and Northern America during the last decade; the more and more representative and reliable LCI data for wood products and competing products has become available. For the future use of the environmental value of wood products within sustainable development, the general perception of the beneficiary use of wood products has to be increased at various stages of decision-making.

[1]  Douglas John Harris,et al.  A quantitative approach to the assessment of the environmental impact of building materials , 1999 .

[2]  Jessie A. Micales,et al.  The decomposition of forest products in landfills , 1997 .

[3]  A. Tukker,et al.  Product innovation and eco-efficiency : twenty-three industry efforts to reach the Factor 4 , 1998 .

[4]  Horst-Christian Langowski,et al.  Life cycle assessment study on resilient floor coverings , 1997 .

[5]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Post-consumer wood in environmental decision-support tools , 2002 .

[6]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Post-Consumer Waste Wood in Attributive Product LCA Context specific evaluation of allocation procedures in a functionalistic conception of LCA , 2007 .

[7]  R. Vlosky,et al.  Agri-based composites in China: Opportunities and challenges , 2004 .

[8]  Michiya Suzuki,et al.  The estimation of energy consumption and CO2 emission due to housing construction in Japan , 1995 .

[9]  Göran Finnveden Life cycle assessment study on resilient floor coverings by Albrecht Günther and Horst-Christian Langowski, Int. J. LCA 2 (2) 73–80 (1997) , 1997 .

[10]  Birger Solberg,et al.  Substitution between floor constructions in wood and natural stone: comparison of energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and costs over the life cycle. , 2003 .

[11]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of flooring materials: Case study , 1997 .

[12]  Frank Werner,et al.  Allocation in LCA of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9 , 2002 .

[13]  Roger A. Sedjo,et al.  Wood materials used as a means to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs): An examination of wooden utility poles , 2002 .

[14]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  CORRIM: Life-Cycle Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials , 2004 .

[15]  Kim Pingoud,et al.  Fossil carbon emissions associated with carbon flowsof wood products , 2002 .

[16]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Post-consumer waste wood in attributive product LCA , 2006 .

[17]  Frank Werner,et al.  Allocation in lca of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9 part i. methodology , 2002 .

[18]  Åsa Jönsson,et al.  Including the use phase in LCA of floor coverings , 1999 .

[19]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction , 1994 .

[20]  Peter Koch,et al.  Wood for structural and architectural purposes , 1976 .

[21]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions , 1999 .

[22]  E. Holleris Petersen,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of four multi-family buildings , 2001 .

[23]  P. Koch Wood versus nonwood materials in U. S. residential construction; Some energy-related global implications , 1992 .

[24]  B. Solberg,et al.  Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden , 2005 .

[25]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Wood innovation in the residential construction sector: Opportunities and constraints , 2001 .

[26]  José Potting,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of four types of floor covering , 1995 .

[27]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings , 2006 .

[28]  P. Börjesson,et al.  Greenhouse gas balances in building construction : wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives , 2000 .

[29]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products : guide and backgrounds (Part 1) , 1992 .

[30]  K. K. Lau,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Implications of Building Materials , 1992 .

[31]  K. Richter,et al.  Holz und Holzprodukte in vergleichenden Ökobilanzen , 1996, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[32]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Ambiguities in decision-oriented Life Cycle Inventories The Role of mental models , 2002 .

[33]  Gerd Wegener,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Wood Floor Coverings - A Representative Study for the German Flooring Industry (11 pp) , 2006 .

[34]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Embodied energy in buildings : wood versus concrete - reply to Börjesson and Gustavsson , 2002 .

[35]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems , 1998 .

[36]  Frank Werner,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Dynamics of an Increased Use of Wood in Buildings in Switzerland , 2006 .

[37]  M. Scharai-Rad,et al.  Environmental and energy balances of wood products and substitutes. , 2002 .

[38]  R. Nedermark,et al.  Ecodesign at Bang & Olufsen , 1998 .