Position paper on passive sampling techniques for the monitoring of contaminants in the aquatic environment – Achievements to date and perspectives

This paper, based on the outcome of discussions at a NORMAN Network-supported workshop in Lyon (France) in November 2014 aims to provide a common position of passive sampling community experts regarding concrete actions required to foster the use of passive sampling techniques in support of contaminant risk assessment and management and for routine monitoring of contaminants in aquatic systems. The brief roadmap presented here focusses on the identification of robust passive sampling methodology, technology that requires further development or that has yet to be developed, our current knowledge of the evaluation of uncertainties when calculating a freely dissolved concentration, the relationship between data from PS and that obtained through biomonitoring. A tiered approach to identifying areas of potential environmental quality standard (EQS) exceedances is also shown. Finally, we propose a list of recommended actions to improve the acceptance of passive sampling by policy-makers. These include the drafting of guidelines, quality assurance and control procedures, developing demonstration projects where biomonitoring and passive sampling are undertaken alongside, organising proficiency testing schemes and interlaboratory comparison and, finally, establishing passive sampler-based assessment criteria in relation to existing EQS.

[1]  D. Betteridge Trends in analytical chemistry , 1980 .

[2]  Water Research , 1961, Nature.

[3]  T. P. Gloria,et al.  Environmental science and technology , 2006 .

[4]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[5]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[6]  Catherine Berho,et al.  An in situ intercomparison exercise on passive samplers for the monitoring of metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and pesticides in surface water , 2012 .

[7]  J. Klánová,et al.  Polymer selection for passive sampling: a comparison of critical properties. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[8]  Jérôme Randon,et al.  Chemical calibration, performance, validation and applications of the polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) in aquatic environments , 2012 .

[9]  It Istituto Superiore di Sanit,et al.  Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document on euthrophication assessment in the context of European water policies. (Technical report 2009-030; Guidance document 23) , 2009 .

[10]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[11]  Graham A. Mills,et al.  Field performance of seven passive sampling devices for monitoring of hydrophobic substances. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Catherine Berho,et al.  Comparison of five integrative samplers in laboratory for the monitoring of indicator and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in water. , 2014, Chemosphere.

[13]  Olivier Geffard,et al.  Relevance and applicability of active biomonitoring in continental waters under the Water Framework Directive , 2012 .

[14]  Hélène Budzinski,et al.  Caged Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea) as a robust tool for the characterization of bioavailable contamination levels in continental waters: towards the determination of threshold values. , 2013, Water research.

[15]  I. Allan,et al.  Passive sampling techniques for monitoring pollutants in water , 2005 .

[16]  AdelFaridFaisal Science of the Total Environment 409 (2011) 2987–2992 , 2013 .

[17]  Gaëlle Poulier,et al.  Can POCIS be used in Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) monitoring networks? A study focusing on pesticides in a French agricultural watershed. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Jana Klanova,et al.  Calibration of silicone rubber passive samplers: experimental and modeled relations between sampling rate and compound properties. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.