Accurate and Fast Subdomain Model for Electromagnetic Design Purpose of Wound-Field Linear Resolver

Linear resolvers are position sensors that are being used in a wide range of applications for linear motion systems. The electromagnetic design of a linear resolver, similar to any other electromagnetic device, demands an accurate, functional, and fast tool. While the finite element method (FEM) is considered the most accurate tool for electromagnetic analysis, it is not a good candidate for an optimization-based design which is an iterative process. In this article, first off, an analytical tool based on the subdomain model is briefly presented. This model is very accurate and much faster than FEM. However, it has high computational time for iterative design and optimization processes. Therefore, in the second step, simplification assumptions are utilized to make the model even faster without compromising the accuracy of the model. In this regard, model numbers 1–4 are developed and then compared to each other in terms of computational time and accuracy. Time stepping FEM (TSFEM) is employed as the reference for comparison between different models. A prototype of the linear resolver is then fabricated to show the validity of the study. Close agreement between simulations and experimental results demonstrates the competency of the study.

[1]  Zahra Nasiri-Gheidari,et al.  Challenges of Finite Element Analysis of Resolvers , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[2]  Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad,et al.  High-Precision Resolver-to-Velocity Converter , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  Peter Sergeant,et al.  Computational-Time Reduction of Fourier-Based Analytical Models , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[4]  Xinghua Wang,et al.  Analytical calculation of air-gap magnetic field distribution and instantaneous characteristics of brushless DC motors , 2003 .

[5]  Rachid Ibtiouen,et al.  Nonlinear Analytical Prediction of Magnetic Field and Electromagnetic Performances in Switched Reluctance Machines , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  Zahra Nasiri-Gheidari,et al.  Subdomain Model for Predicting the Performance of Linear Resolver Considering End Effect and Slotting Effect , 2020, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[8]  Vlado Ostović,et al.  Dynamics of Saturated Electric Machines , 1989 .

[9]  Zahra Nasiri-Gheidari,et al.  Analytical model for performance prediction of linear resolver , 2017 .

[10]  W. S. Hall,et al.  Boundary Element Method , 2006 .

[11]  Davood Arab Khaburi,et al.  Software-Based Resolver-to-Digital Converter for DSP-Based Drives Using an Improved Angle-Tracking Observer , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Analysis of Synchronous Machines , 2008 .

[13]  Zahra Nasiri-Gheidari,et al.  Performance Analysis of Linear Variable Reluctance Resolvers Based on an Improved Winding Function Approach , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[14]  Z.J. Liu,et al.  Analytical Solution of Air-Gap Field in Permanent-Magnet Motors Taking Into Account the Effect of Pole Transition Over Slots , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[15]  Johannes J. H. Paulides,et al.  General Formulation of the Electromagnetic Field Distribution in Machines and Devices Using Fourier Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[16]  Zahra Nasiri-Gheidari,et al.  Development of a Three-Dimensional Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Model for Axial Flux Machines , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Zahra Nasiri-Gheidari,et al.  Design, Performance Analysis, and Prototyping of Linear Resolvers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.