Emancipatory potential of action learning:a critical analysis

Action learning (AL) methods are popular technologies in programs of organizational learning (OL). However, from the perspective of critical studies, they are instrumentalist, managerialist, exclusive in design, decontextualized and apolitical. A critical analysis of the oppressive potential of AL is presented along these dimensions. To realize better AL's emancipatory potential, four enhancements are suggested: focus AL purpose more on workers’ interests; confront organizational practices that unjustly marginalize or privilege different people; acknowledge the complexity, context and contested nature of learning; and facilitate AL using democratic “power with”, not “power over”, approaches to working with people towards emancipatory change.

[1]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  To Transfer is to Transform: The Circulation of Safety Knowledge , 2000 .

[2]  Brian Leavy,et al.  The Concept of Learning in the Strategy Field , 1998 .

[3]  C Dowd,et al.  Learning through experience. , 1983, Nursing times.

[4]  Paula Allman Critical Education Against Global Capitalism: Karl Marx and Revolutionary Critical Education , 2001 .

[5]  J. Burgoyne,et al.  Politics and Organizational Learning , 2000 .

[6]  N. Kulatilaka,et al.  Strategic Learning: the Continuous Side of Discontinuous Strategic Change , 1998 .

[7]  P. Hager,et al.  Life, work, and learning , 2001 .

[8]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[9]  David Scott,et al.  Knowledge, power and learning , 2001 .

[10]  Matthias Finger,et al.  Adult Education at the Crossroads: Learning Our Way Out. Global Perspectives on Adult Education and Training. , 2001 .

[11]  Ian Baptiste Educating Lone Wolves: Pedagogical Implications of Human Capital Theory , 2001 .

[12]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction , 1997 .

[13]  Elana Michelson,et al.  Usual suspects: experience, reflection and the (en) gendering of knowledge , 1996 .

[14]  M. El-den,et al.  Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to the Special Issue , 1993 .

[15]  Henry A. Giroux Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education , 1991 .

[16]  D. Meyerson,et al.  Moving out of the `Armchair': Developing a Framework to Bridge the Gap between Feminist Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[17]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Critical Management Learning , 1997 .

[18]  John Peters,et al.  Design and Evaluation of an Action Learning Program--A Bilateral View. , 1999 .

[19]  Paul Hager,et al.  Life, Work and Learning: Practice in Postmodernity. Routledge International Studies in Philosophy of Education; No. 14. , 2002 .

[20]  Frank Coffield,et al.  Breaking the Consensus: lifelong learning as social control , 1999 .

[21]  M. Easterby-Smith,et al.  Organizational learning: debates past, present and future , 2000 .

[22]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[23]  R. Revans Action Learning: New Techniques for Management , 1980 .

[24]  Barbara Townley,et al.  Reframing Human Resource Management: Power, Ethics and the Subject at Work , 1994 .

[25]  V. Fournier,et al.  At the Critical Moment: Conditions and Prospects for Critical Management Studies , 2000 .