Environmental Policy Integration: The Role of Policy Windows in the Integration of Noise and Spatial Planning

Interest in environmental policy integration (EPI) has recently been strong, both in the literature and in practice. We explore Dutch initiatives to integrate noise management into spatial planning policy in light of the body of literature on EPI. The main approaches of EPI are translated into a conceptual framework consisting of organizational, procedural, and contextual factors. The objective of this literature review is to relate paradigm shifts and policy innovations regarding noise management and spatial planning to empirical windows of opportunity for and barriers to implementation of EPI. It shows how instruments allowing a flexible approach and deviation from standards at the local level fit in with the discourse on decentralized and area-oriented policy. The analysis suggests that procedural and decision-making rules and organizational arrangements can bridge implementation gaps in local-level planning practice. However, EPI in the Netherlands has not solved the noise problem, and the number of affected inhabitants is increasing. We conclude the paper by examining the conceptual and normative issues affecting the integration and prioritization of noise management policy.

[1]  Pieter Glasbergen,et al.  Interactive policy-making - a model of management for public works , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  P. Healey,et al.  Changing Meanings of 'Environment' in the British Planning System , 1994 .

[3]  A. Lenschow The Greening of the EU: The Common Agricultural Policy and the Structural Funds , 1999 .

[4]  Hens Runhaar,et al.  Sustainable Urban Development and the Challenge of Policy Integration: An Assessment of Planning Tools for Integrating Spatial and Environmental Planning in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[5]  Irene van Kamp,et al.  Urban environmental quality and human well-being Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study , 2003 .

[6]  Sara Tyskeng,et al.  Environmental Integration and Policy Implementation: Competing Governance Modes in Waste Management Decision Making , 2009 .

[7]  Eivind Hovden,et al.  Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework , 2003 .

[8]  M. Nilsson Learning, Frames, and Environmental Policy Integration: The Case of Swedish Energy Policy , 2005 .

[9]  Wil Zonneveld,et al.  Spatial Planning in the Network Society-Rethinking the Principles of Planning in the Netherlands , 2000 .

[10]  A. Lenschow Variation in EC environmental policy integration: agency push within complex institutional structures , 1997 .

[11]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Analysing Institutional Strategies for Environmental Policy Integration: The Case of EU Enterprise Policy , 2003 .

[12]  J. V. Tatenhove,et al.  Strategies in Environmental Policy , 2002 .

[13]  Sue Kidd,et al.  Towards a Framework of Integration in Spatial Planning: An Exploration from a Health Perspective , 2007 .

[14]  P. Glasbergen Decentralized reflexive environmental regulation: Opportunities and risks based on an evaluation of Dutch experiments , 2005 .

[15]  Måns Nilsson,et al.  Framework for analysing environmental policy integration , 2003 .

[16]  A. Jordan,et al.  Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review , 2010 .

[17]  Peter P.J. Driessen,et al.  New Directions in Environmental Politics , 2002 .