Polar decomposition of 3 x 3 Mueller matrix: a tool for quantitative tissue polarimetry.

The polarization properties of any medium are completely described by the sixteen element Mueller matrix that relates the polarization parameters of the light incident on the medium to that emerging from it. Measurement of all the elements of the matrix requires a minimum of sixteen measurements involving both linear and circularly polarized light. However, for many diagnostic applications, it would be useful if the polarization parameters can be quantified with linear polarization measurements alone. In this paper, we present a method based on polar decomposition of Mueller matrix for quantification of the polarization parameters of a scattering medium using the nine element (3 x 3) Mueller matrix that requires linear polarization measurements only. The methodology for decomposition of the 3 x 3 Mueller matrix is based on the previously developed decomposition process for sixteen element (4 x 4) Mueller matrix but with an assumption that the depolarization of linearly polarized light due to scattering is independent of the orientation angle of the incident linear polarization vector. Studies conducted on various scattering samples demonstrated that this assumption is valid for a turbid medium like biological tissue where the depolarization of linearly polarized light primarily arises due to the randomization of the field vector's direction as a result of multiple scattering. For such medium, polar decomposition of 3 x 3 Mueller matrix can be used to quantify the four independent polarization parameters namely, the linear retardance (delta ), the circular retardance (psi), the linear depolarization coefficient (Delta) and the linear diattenuation (d) with reasonable accuracy. Since this approach requires measurements using linear polarizers only, it considerably simplifies measurement procedure and might find useful applications in tissue diagnosis using the retrieved polarization parameters.

[1]  Chia-Wei Sun,et al.  Myocardial tissue characterization based on the time-resolved Stokes-Mueller formalism. , 2002, Optics express.

[2]  Yanfang Li,et al.  Polarization-based optical imaging and processing techniques with application to the cancer diagnostics , 2002, SPIE BiOS.

[3]  Z. Kam,et al.  Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1998 .

[4]  M. K. Swami,et al.  Mueller matrix approach for determination of optical rotation in chiral turbid media in backscattering geometry. , 2006, Optics express.

[5]  Jérôme Morio,et al.  Influence of the order of diattenuator, retarder, and polarizer in polar decomposition of Mueller matrices. , 2004, Optics letters.

[6]  Asima Pradhan,et al.  Depolarization of light in a multiply scattering medium: effect of the refractive index of a scatterer. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  I. Alex Vitkin,et al.  Polarization preservation in diffusive scattering from in vivo turbid biological media: effects of tissue optical absorption in the exact backscattering direction , 2001 .

[8]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Determination of birefringence and absolute optic axis orientation using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography with PM fibers. , 2003, Optics express.

[9]  Oksana Kostyuk,et al.  Novel spectroscopic technique for in situ monitoring of collagen fibril alignment in gels. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[10]  M. V. van Gemert,et al.  Two-dimensional birefringence imaging in biological tissue using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography , 1997, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.

[11]  G. Coté,et al.  Noninvasive glucose sensing utilizing a digital closed-loop polarimetric approach , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R. Stern,et al.  Collagen in the egg shell membranes of the hen. , 1984, Developmental biology.

[13]  E. Collett,et al.  Polarization measurements in a spectrofluorophotometer , 1996 .

[14]  Enric Garcia-Caurel,et al.  Spectroscopic Mueller polarimeter based on liquid crystal devices , 2004 .

[15]  Jack Cariou,et al.  Analysis of the depolarizing properties of irradiated pig skin , 2004 .

[16]  R J McNichols,et al.  Optical glucose sensing in biological fluids: an overview. , 2000, Journal of biomedical optics.

[17]  I Alex Vitkin,et al.  Optical rotation and linear and circular depolarization rates in diffusively scattered light from chiral, racemic, and achiral turbid media. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  I. Vitkin,et al.  Effects of molecular asymmetry of optically active molecules on the polarization properties of multiply scattered light. , 2002, Optics express.

[19]  D. Côté,et al.  Robust concentration determination of optically active molecules in turbid media with validated three-dimensional polarization sensitive Monte Carlo calculations. , 2005, Optics express.

[20]  R. Chipman,et al.  Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition , 1996 .

[21]  Gang Yao,et al.  Monte Carlo model and single-scattering approximation of the propagation of polarized light in turbid media containing glucose. , 2002, Applied optics.

[22]  H. S. Patel,et al.  Depolarization of light in tissue phantoms – effect of collection geometry , 2003 .

[23]  Matthew H. Smith,et al.  Interpreting Mueller matrix images of tissues , 2001, SPIE BiOS.

[24]  J. Walsh,et al.  Comparative study of polarized light propagation in biologic tissues. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.

[25]  N. Ghosh,et al.  Depolarization of light in tissue phantoms - effect of a distribution in the size of scatterers. , 2003, Optics express.

[26]  Antonello De Martino,et al.  Mueller polarimetric imaging system with liquid crystals. , 2004, Applied optics.

[27]  M. Moscoso,et al.  Influence of the relative refractive index on the depolarization of multiply scattered waves. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  J. Walsh,et al.  Quantitative measurements of linear birefringence during heating of native collagen , 1997, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[29]  Schmitt,et al.  Depolarization of multiply scattered waves by spherical diffusers: Influence of the size parameter. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.