Timing of Recovery After Surgery for Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Observational Study From the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Cadotte | P. Phan | G. McIntosh | H. Hall | C. Bailey | N. Evaniew | S. Christie | N. Dea | K. Thomas | W. B. Jacobs | Y. R. Rampersaud | J. Paquet | A. Nataraj | N. Attabib | R. Charest-Morin | M. Weber | Charles Fisher | M. Coyle
[1] B. Aarabi,et al. We Choose to Call it ‘Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy’: Findings of AO Spine RECODE-DCM, an International and Multi-Stakeholder Partnership to Agree a Standard Unifying Term and Definition for a Disease , 2022, Global spine journal.
[2] B. Davies,et al. A scoping review of information provided within degenerative cervical myelopathy education resources: Towards enhancing shared decision making , 2022, PloS one.
[3] B. Aarabi,et al. Developing Peri-Operative Rehabilitation in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 6]: An Unexplored Opportunity? , 2022, Global spine journal.
[4] Jefferson R. Wilson,et al. Optimizing the Application of Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 10] , 2022, Global spine journal.
[5] B. Aarabi,et al. Establishing the Socio-Economic Impact of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Is Fundamental to Improving Outcomes [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 8] , 2022, Global spine journal.
[6] Rory K. J. Murphy,et al. Improving Awareness Could Transform Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 1] , 2022, Global spine journal.
[7] A. Asher,et al. High-impact chronic pain transition in surgical recipients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2022, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[8] Allan R. Martin,et al. Improving Assessment of Disease Severity and Strategies for Monitoring Progression in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 4] , 2021, Global spine journal.
[9] B. Aarabi,et al. Gathering Global Perspectives to Establish the Research Priorities and Minimum Data Sets for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Sampling Strategy of the First Round Consensus Surveys of AO Spine RECODE-DCM , 2021, Global spine journal.
[10] Jefferson R. Wilson,et al. Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2021, Spine.
[11] B. Davies,et al. Can co-authorship networks be used to predict author research impact? A machine-learning based analysis within the field of degenerative cervical myelopathy research , 2021, PloS one.
[12] D. Cadotte,et al. Effectiveness of Surgical Decompression in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results of the Canadian Prospective Multicenter Study. , 2021, Neurosurgery.
[13] J. Finkelstein,et al. Minimally Invasive Tubular Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Open Lumbar Discectomy: An Observational Study From the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network , 2021, Global spine journal.
[14] Allan R. Martin,et al. Clinical outcomes of nonoperatively managed degenerative cervical myelopathy: an ambispective longitudinal cohort study in 117 patients. , 2021, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[15] K. Freund,et al. Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA.
[16] Y. Rampersaud,et al. Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Patients With Back Pain and Degenerative Disc Disease: An Observational Study From the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network , 2021, Global spine journal.
[17] Kristin R. Archer,et al. Trajectory of Improvement in Myelopathic Symptoms From 3 to 12 Months Following Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. , 2020, Neurosurgery.
[18] D. Cadotte,et al. Clinical predictors of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an external validation study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[19] D. Cadotte,et al. Treatment of Mild Cervical Myelopathy: Factors Associated with Decision for Surgical Intervention. , 2019, Spine.
[20] D. Cadotte,et al. Decompression Alone vs Decompression plus Fusion for Claudication Secondary to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. , 2019, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[21] B. Aarabi,et al. Recovery priorities in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cross-sectional survey of an international, online community of patients , 2019, BMJ Open.
[22] B. Davies,et al. Research Inefficiency in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Findings of a Systematic Review on Research Activity Over the Past 20 Years , 2019, Global spine journal.
[23] B. Aarabi,et al. RE-CODE DCM (REsearch Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy): A Consensus Process to Improve Research Efficiency in DCM, Through Establishment of a Standardized Dataset for Clinical Research and the Definition of the Research Priorities , 2019, Global spine journal.
[24] Y. Rampersaud,et al. Clinical outcomes research in spine surgery: what are appropriate follow-up times? , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[25] M. Fehlings,et al. Efficacy and Safety of Surgery for Mild Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results of the AOSpine North America and International Prospective Multicenter Studies , 2018, Neurosurgery.
[26] Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan,et al. Is there a role for postoperative physiotherapy in degenerative cervical myelopathy? A systematic review , 2018, Clinical rehabilitation.
[27] Allan R. Martin,et al. Can microstructural MRI detect subclinical tissue injury in subjects with asymptomatic cervical spinal cord compression? A prospective cohort study , 2018, BMJ Open.
[28] Joseph S. Cheng,et al. Postoperative Resolution of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Intensity Changes and the Associated Impact on Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of a Global Cohort of Patients , 2017, Spine.
[29] Jefferson R. Wilson,et al. Predicting the minimum clinically important difference in patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy. , 2016, Neurosurgical focus.
[30] M. Fehlings,et al. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy , 2015, Spine.
[31] C. Bolger,et al. A Global Perspective on the Outcomes of Surgical Decompression in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Results From the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine International Study on 479 Patients , 2015, Spine.
[32] M. Fehlings,et al. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathogenesis , 2015, Spine.
[33] E. Sariali,et al. Early neurological recovery course after surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up using three different functional assessment tests , 2014, European Spine Journal.
[34] D C Cole,et al. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[35] M. Fehlings,et al. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy , 2016, European Spine Journal.