Scaffold Stiffness Influences Cell Behavior: Opportunities for Skeletal Tissue Engineering

Skeletal defects resulting from trauma, tumors, or abnormal development frequently require surgical treatment to restore normal tissue function. To overcome the limitations associated with conventional surgical treatments, several tissue engineering approaches have been developed. In particular, the use of scaffolds enriched with stem cells appears to be a very promising strategy. A crucial issue in this approach is how to control stem cell behavior. In this respect, the effects of growth factors, scaffold surface characteristics, and external ‘active’ loading conditions on stem cell behavior have been investigated. Recently, it has become clear that the stiffness of a scaffold is a highly potent regulator of stem cell differentiation. In addition, the stiffness of a scaffold affects cell migration, which is important for the infiltration of host tissue cells. This review summarizes current knowledge on the role of the scaffold stiffness in the regulation of cell behavior. Furthermore, we discuss how this knowledge can be incorporated in scaffold design which may provide new opportunities in the context of orthopedic tissue engineering.

[1]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[2]  M. Lorenzoni,et al.  Harvesting of cancellous bone from the proximal tibia under local anesthesia: donor site morbidity and patient experience. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[4]  Antonios G. Mikos,et al.  Pore Morphology Effects on the Fibrovascular Tissue Growth in Porous Polymer Substrates , 1994, Cell transplantation.

[5]  Wan-Ju Li,et al.  Mold-shaped, nanofiber scaffold-based cartilage engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells and bioreactor. , 2008, The Journal of surgical research.

[6]  Joe Tien,et al.  Mechanotransduction at cell-matrix and cell-cell contacts. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[7]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  Cell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule , 1984, Nature.

[8]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  V. Valderrábano,et al.  Free Fibula Donor-Site Morbidity: Clinical and Biomechanical Analysis , 2007, Annals of plastic surgery.

[10]  C. Jacobs,et al.  Biomechanical regulation of mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells and the implications for regenerative medicine , 2005 .

[11]  R. Langer,et al.  Designing materials for biology and medicine , 2004, Nature.

[12]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[13]  S. Ahmed,et al.  Biology and clinical applications , 2004 .

[14]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction , 2003, Annals of medicine.

[15]  R. Mischkowski,et al.  Donor-Site Morbidity of Ear Cartilage Autografts , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  G. Schuurhuis,et al.  Phenotypical and functional characterization of freshly isolated adipose tissue-derived stem cells. , 2007, Stem cells and development.

[17]  J O Hollinger,et al.  Role of bone substitutes. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  H. Bianco-Peled,et al.  Defining the role of matrix compliance and proteolysis in three-dimensional cell spreading and remodeling. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Wan-Ju Li,et al.  Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nanofibrous poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds† , 2003 .

[20]  Jay R Lieberman,et al.  The role of growth factors in the repair of bone. Biology and clinical applications. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  Wan-Ju Li,et al.  Chondrocyte phenotype in engineered fibrous matrix is regulated by fiber size. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[22]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. Tuan,et al.  Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nanofibrous poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[24]  H. Esperou,et al.  Prevalence and clinical features of hepatitis G virus infection in bone marrow allograft recipients , 1997, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[25]  H. Kleinman,et al.  Role of the extracellular matrix in morphogenesis. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[26]  J. Nemzek,et al.  Retroviral transmission by the transplantation of connective-tissue allografts. An experimental study. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  Horst Kessler,et al.  RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[28]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Adhesion-contractile balance in myocyte differentiation , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[29]  Shouren Ge,et al.  Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[30]  Antonios G Mikos,et al.  Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[31]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Influence of type I collagen surface density on fibroblast spreading, motility, and contractility. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[32]  J. Czyż,et al.  Embryonic stem cell differentiation: the role of extracellular factors. , 2001, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[33]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[34]  R. Schmelzeisen,et al.  Soft tissue and hard tissue engineering in oral and maxillofacial surgery. , 2002, Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons.

[35]  D. L. Cochran,et al.  Osteoblast-Mediated Mineral Deposition in Culture is Dependent on Surface Microtopography , 2002, Calcified Tissue International.

[36]  J. Jansen,et al.  Scaffold mesh size affects the osteoblastic differentiation of seeded marrow stromal cells cultured in a flow perfusion bioreactor. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[37]  Sanjin Zvonic,et al.  Immunophenotype of Human Adipose‐Derived Cells: Temporal Changes in Stromal‐Associated and Stem Cell–Associated Markers , 2006, Stem cells.

[38]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Synthetic extracellular matrices for in situ tissue engineering , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[39]  V. Rosen,et al.  Bone morphogenetic protein and bone morphogenetic protein gene family in bone formation and repair. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[40]  D E Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. , 1993, Science.

[41]  Clemens A van Blitterswijk,et al.  Cell-Based Bone Tissue Engineering , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[42]  Hawoong Jeong,et al.  Role of the cytoskeleton in signaling networks , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[43]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[44]  L G Griffith,et al.  Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[45]  V. Sikavitsas,et al.  Effect of bone extracellular matrix synthesized in vitro on the osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[46]  Chung-Ho Chen,et al.  Donor site morbidity after harvesting of proximal tibia bone , 2006, Head & neck.

[47]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[48]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[49]  J. Nemzek,et al.  Retroviral Transmission in Bone Allotransplantation: The Effects of Tissue Processing , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[50]  S. Cook,et al.  Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (Human HIV‐II) Transmission in Allograft Bone Procedures , 1995, Spine.

[51]  J. Klein-Nulend,et al.  Stem cells from adipose tissue allow challenging new concepts for regenerative medicine. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[52]  Juan J de Pablo,et al.  Inhibition of human embryonic stem cell differentiation by mechanical strain , 2006, Journal of cellular physiology.

[53]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[54]  Richard Tuli,et al.  Multilineage differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[55]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  Martin Schuler,et al.  Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[57]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction: All Signals Point to Cytoskeleton, Matrix, and Integrins , 2002, Science's STKE.

[58]  F. Guilak,et al.  Clonal analysis of the differentiation potential of human adipose‐derived adult stem cells , 2006, Journal of cellular physiology.

[59]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  David L. Cochran,et al.  Mechanisms Involved in Osteoblast Response to Implant Surface Morphology , 2001 .

[61]  B. C,et al.  Tensegrity and mechanoregulation : from skeleton to cytoskeleton , 1999 .

[62]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[63]  R Cancedda,et al.  Repair of large bone defects with the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[64]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[65]  F. Guilak,et al.  Mechanical signals as regulators of stem cell fate. , 2004, Current topics in developmental biology.

[66]  A. Reddi,et al.  Cartilage morphogenetic proteins: role in joint development, homoeostasis, and regeneration , 2003, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[67]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[68]  D. Discher,et al.  Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[69]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[70]  A. Reddi.  Cartilage morphogenesis: role of bone and cartilage morphogenetic proteins, homeobox genes and extracellular matrix. , 1995, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[71]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Role of adult mesenchymal stem cells in bone tissue engineering applications: current status and future prospects. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[72]  J. A. Cooper,et al.  Engineering controllable anisotropy in electrospun biodegradable nanofibrous scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[73]  Newell R Washburn,et al.  High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[74]  P. Zuk.  Tissue Engineering Craniofacial Defects With Adult Stem Cells? Are We Ready Yet? , 2008, Pediatric Research.

[75]  R. LaPrade,et al.  Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autograft transfer procedures. , 2004, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[76]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[77]  J. Kohn,et al.  Physico-mechanical properties of degradable polymers used in medical applications: a comparative study. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[78]  Janos Vörös,et al.  Systematic study of osteoblast response to nanotopography by means of nanoparticle-density gradients. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[79]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[80]  P. Janmey.  The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[81]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Balance of chemistry, topography, and mechanics at the cell–biomaterial interface: Issues and challenges for assessing the role of substrate mechanics on cell response , 2004 .

[82]  K. Beningo,et al.  Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[83]  Min Zhu,et al.  Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[84]  Rodolfo Quarto,et al.  Cell Therapy for Bone Disease: A Review of Current Status , 2003, Stem cells.

[85]  F M Watt,et al.  Out of Eden: stem cells and their niches. , 2000, Science.

[86]  J. V. Hest,et al.  Protein-based materials, toward a new level of structural control. , 2001, Chemical communications.

[87]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[88]  A. Reddi,et al.  Regulation of cartilage and bone differentiation by bone morphogenetic proteins. , 1992, Current opinion in cell biology.

[89]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. , 2002, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[90]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[91]  C. Streuli,et al.  Extracellular matrix remodelling and cellular differentiation. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[92]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[93]  R. Tuan,et al.  A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[94]  V. Rosen,et al.  Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. , 1988, Science.

[95]  D. Seliktar,et al.  Matrix stiffness affects spontaneous contraction of cardiomyocytes cultured within a PEGylated fibrinogen biomaterial. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[96]  J. D. de Pablo,et al.  TGFbeta/Activin/Nodal pathway in inhibition of human embryonic stem cell differentiation by mechanical strain. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[97]  J. Settleman,et al.  Tension precedes commitment-even for a stem cell. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[98]  Y. Wang,et al.  Preparation of a flexible, porous polyacrylamide substrate for mechanical studies of cultured cells. , 1998, Methods in enzymology.

[99]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[100]  K. Burg,et al.  Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[101]  Å. Carlsson,et al.  Transmission of human T-cell lymphotrophic virus type 1 by a deep-frozen bone allograft. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[102]  M. Bissell,et al.  Multi‐faceted regulation of cell differentiation by extracellular matrix , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.