An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus.

The purpose of this study was to describe the extramedullary humeral morphology in paired humeri to determine whether geometric differences exist from side to side in the same individual. The anatomic characteristics of 28 paired, dry cadaveric humeri were measured by use of an electromagnetic tracking system. Of the characteristics examined, only the humeral head height was significantly different between right and left humeri in the same individual (P < .005). Most of the characteristics had excellent intra-specimen repeatability. In conclusion, there are few significant differences between contralateral humeral anatomic characteristics. Therefore, the uninjured contralateral humerus can provide a reasonable approximation to the native geometry of the fractured humerus and should be a reliable model for measuring parameters related to implant geometry and optimal positioning during hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

[1]  A. Hernigou,et al.  Determining Humeral Retroversion with Computed Tomography , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Limits imposed on glenohumeral motion by joint geometry. , 1995, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  M. Pearl,et al.  Retroversion of the proximal humerus in relationship to prosthetic replacement arthroplasty. , 1995, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  J. Damilakis,et al.  The bicipital groove as a landmark for orientation of the humeral prosthesis in cases of fracture. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  S N Roberts,et al.  The geometry of the humeral head and the design of prostheses. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  M. Kronberg,et al.  Retroversion of the humeral head in the normal shoulder and its relationship to the normal range of motion. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  G. Walch,et al.  Tuberosity Osteosynthesis and Hemiarthroplasty for Four-Part Fractures of the Proximal Humerus , 2000 .

[8]  J. Iannotti,et al.  The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  M. Leunig,et al.  Surgical landmarks to determine humeral head retrotorsion for hemiarthroplasty in fractures. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  F. Kummer,et al.  The use of the bicipital groove for alignment of the humeral stem in shoulder arthroplasty. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  Gilles Walch,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Geometry of the Proximal Humerus: Implications for Surgical Technique and Prosthetic Design , 1997 .

[12]  Randy E. Ellis,et al.  Fixation-Based Surgery: A New Technique for Distal Radius Osteotomy , 2000, MICCAI.

[13]  P Boileau,et al.  The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Three-dimensional recording and description of motions of the shoulder mechanism. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  D D Robertson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Proximal Part of the Humerus: Relevance to Arthroplasty* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  J. Damilakis,et al.  An individualized approach for the implantation of a humeral prosthesis with the proper retroversion in fractures , 2001, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[17]  J. Sidles,et al.  Humeral head prosthetic arthroplasty: Surgically relevant geometric considerations. , 1993, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  Ulf Knothe,et al.  Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. , 2002, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[19]  E. Tillett,et al.  Anatomic determination of humeral head retroversion: The relationship of the central axis of the humeral head to the bicipital groove. , 1993, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  G. Edelson.  Variations in the retroversion of the humeral head. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[21]  M. Pearl,et al.  Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. , 1996, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  R. Burks,et al.  Comparison of humeral head retroversion with the humeral axis/biceps groove relationship: a study in live subjects and cadavers. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[23]  R. L. Dooley,et al.  Anthropometric study of normal glenohumeral relationships. , 1997, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.