Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women

The objective of this paper is to identify the incentives and barriers to marriage among cohabiting women, especially disadvantaged mothers who are targets of welfare reform. We use the newly released cohabitation data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (1979–2000), which tracks the partners of cohabiting women across survey waves. Our results support several conclusions. First, cohabiting unions are short-lived—about one-half end within one year, and over 90% end by the fifth year. Unlike most previous research, our results show that most cohabiting unions end by dissolution of the relationship rather than by marriage. Second, transitions to marriage are especially unlikely among poor women; less than one-third marry within five years. Cohabitation among poor women is more likely than that among nonpoor women to be a long-term alternative or substitute for traditional marriage. Third, our multinomial analysis of transitions from cohabitation into marriage or dissolution highlights the salience of economically disadvantaged family backgrounds, cohabitation and fertility histories, women’s economic resources, and partner characteristics. These results are interpreted in a policy environment that increasingly views marriage as an economic panacea for low-income women and their children.

[1]  S. Mclanahan,et al.  High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. , 2005 .

[2]  Joanna M. Reed,et al.  Why Don't They Just Get Married? Barriers to Marriage among the Disadvantaged , 2005, The Future of children.

[3]  Iain McLean,et al.  State of the Union , 2005 .

[4]  D. Lichter,et al.  Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing, Marital Prospects and Mate Selection , 2005 .

[5]  Pamela J. Smock,et al.  "Everything's There Except Money": How Money Shapes Decisions to Marry among Cohabitors. , 2005 .

[6]  S. Mclanahan,et al.  "His" and "Her" Marriage Expectations: Determinants and Consequences , 2005 .

[7]  S. Mclanahan,et al.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in Marriage after the Birth of a Child , 2004 .

[8]  I. Garfinkel,et al.  The effects of welfare and child support policies on union formation , 2004 .

[9]  Andrew J. Cherlin,et al.  The deinstitutionalization of American marriage , 2004 .

[10]  J. Mauldon,et al.  Attitudes of welfare recipients toward marriage and childbearing , 2004 .

[11]  P. England,et al.  Union formation in fragile families , 2004, Demography.

[12]  Sharon Sassler.  The Process of Entering into Cohabiting Unions , 2004 .

[13]  D. Lichter,et al.  Welfare Reform and Marriage Promotion: The Marital Expectations and Desires of Single and Cohabiting Mothers , 2004, Social Service Review.

[14]  J. Mcnally,et al.  Cohabiting couples’ economic circumstances and union transitions: a re-examination using multiple imputation techniques ☆ , 2003 .

[15]  A. Cherlin.  Should the Government Promote Marriage? , 2003 .

[16]  Yu Xie,et al.  Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation , 2003, Demography.

[17]  S. Lundberg,et al.  Child gender and the transition to marriage , 2003, Demography.

[18]  Kirk A. Johnson,et al.  Increasing Marriage Will Dramatically Reduce Child Poverty. A Report of the Heritage Center for Data Analysis. , 2003 .

[19]  Lawrence L. Wu,et al.  Out of Wedlock: Causes and Consequences of Nonmarital Fertility , 2003 .

[20]  V. Oppenheimer.  Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process , 2003, Demography.

[21]  D. Lichter,et al.  Is Marriage a Panacea? Union Formation among Economically Disadvantaged Unwed Mothers , 2003 .

[22]  D. Lichter,et al.  Marriage among unwed mothers: whites, blacks and Hispanics compared. , 2002, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[23]  M. Sweeney.  Two Decades of Family Change: The Shifting Economic Foundations of Marriage , 2002, American Sociological Review.

[24]  C. Hansen,et al.  Table 2 , 2002, Equality and Non-Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights.

[25]  Michael Murphy,et al.  Samuel H. Preston, Patrick Heuveline and Michel Guillot, Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes , 2001 .

[26]  R. K. Raley,et al.  Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: evidence for the second demographic transition in the united states? , 2001, Demography.

[27]  S. Preston,et al.  Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes , 2000 .

[28]  S. Hoffman.  A Treatise on the Family , 2000 .

[29]  Susan L. Brown.  Union Transitions Among Cohabitors: The Significance of Relationship Assessments and Expectations , 2000 .

[30]  K. Edin.  What Do Low-Income Single Mothers Say about Marriage? , 2000 .

[31]  L. Bumpass,et al.  Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States , 2000, Population studies.

[32]  L. Waite,et al.  Interrelated family-building behaviors: Cohabitation, marriage, and nonmarital conception , 1999, Demography.

[33]  D. Lichter,et al.  Life course transitions of American children: Parental cohabitation, marriage, and single motherhood , 1999, Demography.

[34]  R. Schoen,et al.  The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage , 1999 .

[35]  P. Smock,et al.  Sex-Specialized or Collaborative Mate Selection? Union Transitions among Cohabitors , 1998 .

[36]  R. Moffitt,et al.  Beyond single mothers: Cohabitation and marriage in the AFDC program , 1998, Demography.

[37]  M. Sweeney.  Remarriage of Women and Men After Divorce , 1997, Journal of family issues.

[38]  P. Smock,et al.  Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage , 1997, Demography.

[39]  D. Lichter,et al.  Poverty and the marital behavior of young women , 1997 .

[40]  P. Smock,et al.  Why marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitors , 1995, Demography.

[41]  Zheng Wu.  The stability of cohabitation relationships: the role of children. , 1995 .

[42]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Using Panel Data to Estimate the Effects of Events , 1994 .

[43]  D. Bloom,et al.  The influence of nonmarital childbearing on the formation of first marriages , 1993, Demography.

[44]  L. Bumpass,et al.  National Estimates of Cohabitation , 1989, Demography.

[45]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[46]  R. E. Baber,et al.  Out of Wedlock , 1954 .

[47]  H. Blossfeld.  Event History Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[48]  Kirk A. Johnson,et al.  Increasing Marriage Would Dramatically Reduce Child Poverty , 2008 .

[49]  A. Cherlin,et al.  Welfare, work, and changes in mothers’ living arrangements in low-income families , 2005 .

[50]  Maria Kefalas,et al.  Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage , 2005 .

[51]  R. Moffitt,et al.  The Determinants of Marriage and Cohabitation Among Disadvantaged Americans: Research Findings and Needs , 2003 .

[52]  L. Gennetian,et al.  Staying Single: The Effects of Welfare Reform Policies on Marriage and Cohabitation , 2003 .

[53]  Jason M. Fields,et al.  America''s Families and Living Arrangements: Population Characteristics , 2001 .

[54]  D. Lichter,et al.  Finding a Mate? The Marital and Cohabitation Histories of Unwed Mothers , 1999 .

[55]  V. Oppenheimer.  Women's employment and the gain to marriage: the specialization and trading model. , 1997, Annual review of sociology.

[56]  P. Allison.  Event History Analysis , 1984 .

[57]  P. Allison.  Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories , 1982 .

[58]  American families and living arrangements. , 1980, Current population reports. Series P-20, Population characteristics.