Dissociable Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Conscious and Unconscious Control of Behavior

Cognitive control allows humans to overrule and inhibit habitual responses to optimize performance in challenging situations. Contradicting traditional views, recent studies suggest that cognitive control processes can be initiated unconsciously. To further capture the relation between consciousness and cognitive control, we studied the dynamics of inhibitory control processes when triggered consciously versus unconsciously in a modified version of the stop task. Attempts to inhibit an imminent response were often successful after unmasked (visible) stop signals. Masked (invisible) stop signals rarely succeeded in instigating overt inhibition but did trigger slowing down of response times. Masked stop signals elicited a sequence of distinct ERP components that were also observed on unmasked stop signals. The N2 component correlated with the efficiency of inhibitory control when elicited by unmasked stop signals and with the magnitude of slowdown when elicited by masked stop signals. Thus, the N2 likely reflects the initiation of inhibitory control, irrespective of conscious awareness. The P3 component was much reduced in amplitude and duration on masked versus unmasked stop trials. These patterns of differences and similarities between conscious and unconscious cognitive control processes are discussed in a framework that differentiates between feedforward and feedback connections in yielding conscious experience.

[1]  Laura Busse,et al.  Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  C. Lamm,et al.  Emotion regulation in children with behavior problems: Linking behavioral and brain processes , 2012, Development and Psychopathology.

[3]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconsciously Triggered Inhibitory Control , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[5]  R. Passingham,et al.  Unconscious Activation of the Cognitive Control System in the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Automatic and Controlled Response Inhibition: Associative Learning in the Go/no-go and Stop-signal Paradigms the Go/no-go Paradigm and the Stop-signal Paradigm , 2022 .

[7]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology , 2001, Cognition.

[9]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Masking Interrupts Figure-Ground Signals in V1 , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Brain Dynamics Underlying the Nonlinear Threshold for Access to Consciousness , 2007, PLoS biology.

[11]  Anthony J. Marcel,et al.  Consciousness in Contemporary Science , 1992 .

[12]  J. Kenemans,et al.  The pure electrophysiology of stopping. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  R. Dolan,et al.  How the Brain Translates Money into Force: A Neuroimaging Study of Subliminal Motivation , 2007, Science.

[14]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  G. Logan,et al.  The Development of Selective Inhibitory Control Across the Life Span , 2002, Developmental neuropsychology.

[16]  Uwe Mattler,et al.  Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  The control operations of consciousness. , 1988 .

[18]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  I. Biederman,et al.  Localizing the cortical region mediating visual awareness of object identity. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Aron.  The Neural Basis of Inhibition in Cognitive Control , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[21]  V. Lamme.  Towards a true neural stance on consciousness , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  M. Desmurget,et al.  An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Shuhei Yamaguchi,et al.  The Key Locus of Common Response Inhibition Network for No-go and Stop Signals , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Masking Disrupts Reentrant Processing in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Stuart J Johnstone,et al.  Inhibitory motor control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials in the stop-signal paradigm , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  Martina Rieger,et al.  Inhibitory after‐effects in the stop signal paradigm , 1999 .

[27]  B. Libet.  Do we have free will , 2005 .

[28]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[30]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: The insula and the significance of failed inhibition , 2006, Brain Research.

[31]  Leanne Boucher,et al.  Influence of history on saccade countermanding performance in humans and macaque monkeys , 2007, Vision Research.

[32]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Evidence for an Error Monitoring Deficit in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2004, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[33]  W. Singer,et al.  Better than conscious? : decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions , 2008 .

[34]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[35]  C. N. Boehler,et al.  Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Stuart J. Johnstone,et al.  Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: Do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply novelty effects? , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[37]  J. Driver,et al.  Visibility Reflects Dynamic Changes of Effective Connectivity between V1 and Fusiform Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[38]  J. Changeux,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Conscious Processing , 2011, Neuron.

[39]  Mario Liotti,et al.  Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[40]  Deborah E. Hannula,et al.  Imaging implicit perception: promise and pitfalls , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  G. Logan,et al.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  R. Constable,et al.  Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post-Response Processing , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  R. Dolan,et al.  Subliminal Instrumental Conditioning Demonstrated in the Human Brain , 2008, Neuron.

[45]  M. Eimer,et al.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Robert J. Barry,et al.  The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: Indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  M. Eimer.  Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[48]  G D Logan,et al.  Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Imaging unconscious semantic priming , 1998, Nature.

[50]  G. Logan,et al.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. , 2007, Psychological review.

[51]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[52]  D. Holender,et al.  Unconscious perception: The need for a paradigm shift , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  A. Cowey,et al.  Blindsight in man and monkey. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[55]  Thane S. Pittman,et al.  Perception Without Awareness , 1992 .

[56]  M. W. Molen,et al.  A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[57]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1) , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.

[59]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Parts Outweigh the Whole (Word) in Unconscious Analysis of Meaning , 2000, Psychological science.

[60]  B. Hommel.  Consciousness and Control Not Identical Twins , 2007 .

[61]  G. Logan,et al.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  M. Eimer,et al.  Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[63]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[64]  L. Weiskrantz.  Blindsight revisited , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[65]  G. Band,et al.  Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[66]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Conflict, consciousness, and control , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Responding with Restraint: What Are the Neurocognitive Mechanisms? , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  Geert J. M. van Boxtel,et al.  Stimulation of the Subthalamic Region Facilitates the Selection and Inhibition of Motor Responses in Parkinson's Disease , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[70]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[71]  A. Kok.  Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[72]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[73]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  G. Logan.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[75]  S. Dehaene.  Conscious and Nonconscious Processes:Distinct Forms of Evidence Accumulation? , 2011 .

[76]  O. Neumann.  Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception , 1990, Psychological research.

[77]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: The N2/P3 complex further validated , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[78]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.