Representations of the magnitudes of fractions.

We tested whether adults can use integrated, analog, magnitude representations to compare the values of fractions. The only previous study on this question concluded that even college students cannot form such representations and instead compare fraction magnitudes by representing numerators and denominators as separate whole numbers. However, atypical characteristics of the presented fractions might have provoked the use of atypical comparison strategies in that study. In our 3 experiments, university and community college students compared more balanced sets of single-digit and multi-digit fractions and consistently exhibited a logarithmic distance effect. Thus, adults used integrated, analog representations, akin to a mental number line, to compare fraction magnitudes. We interpret differences between the past and present findings in terms of different stimuli eliciting different solution strategies.

[1]  Thomas P. Carpenter,et al.  Results from the Second Mathematics Assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress , 1981 .

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Siegler,et al.  Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  R. Siegler,et al.  Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: a microgenetic analysis. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  On the development of the mental number line: more, less, or never holistic with increasing age? , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[6]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Notation-Independent Representation of Fractions in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Rebecca Bull,et al.  Number games, magnitude representation, and basic number skills in preschoolers. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[8]  D. Ansari.  Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Yujing Ni,et al.  Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias , 2005 .

[10]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Cognition, Perception, and Language , 1997 .

[11]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Architectures for Arithmetic , 2004 .

[12]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[13]  David C. Geary,et al.  Development of Mathematical Understanding. , 2007 .

[14]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[15]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Developing Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Skill in Mathematics: An Iterative Process. , 2001 .

[16]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Analysing the adaptiveness of strategy choices using the choice/no-choice method: The case of numerosity judgement , 2003 .

[17]  D. Ross,et al.  The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence , 2006 .

[18]  U. Goswami,et al.  Does half a pizza equal half a box of chocolates?: Proportional matching in an analogy task , 2001 .

[19]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  The processing and representation of fractions within the brain An fMRI investigation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  S. Carey,et al.  The Epigenesis of mind : essays on biology and cognition , 1991 .

[21]  David C. Geary,et al.  The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence , 2004 .

[22]  Geetha B. Ramani,et al.  Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games. , 2008, Child development.

[23]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Number sense growth in kindergarten: a longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. , 2006, Child development.

[24]  E. J. Carter,et al.  Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children , 2006, PLoS biology.

[25]  Mary K. Hoard,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. , 2007, Child development.

[26]  R. Siegler.  The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. , 1987 .

[27]  C. Sophian.  Origins of cognitive skills : the Eighteenth Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition , 1984 .

[28]  I Kirk.  Selection procedures , 2004, British Dental Journal.

[29]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  A validation of eye movements as a measure of elementary school children's developing number sense , 2008 .

[30]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Elida V. Laski,et al.  Is 27 a big number? Correlational and causal connections among numerical categorization, number line estimation, and numerical magnitude comparison. , 2007, Child development.

[32]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The mental representation of numerical fractions: real or integer? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  R. Siegler.  Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking , 1996 .

[35]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' Discrimination of Number vs. Continuous Extent , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Wim Fias,et al.  Spatial representation of numbers. , 2004 .

[37]  Jeffrey Bisanz,et al.  Selection of Procedures in Mental Addition: Reassessing the Problem Size Effect in Adults , 1996 .

[38]  R. Siegler,et al.  The Development of Numerical Estimation , 2003, Psychological science.

[39]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: a conceptual change approach , 2004 .

[40]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. , 2008, Child development.

[41]  P. Lemaire,et al.  Adults' age-related differences in adaptivity of strategy choices: evidence from computational estimation. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[42]  Charles Cox,et al.  The foundations of success , 1995 .

[43]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[44]  Jamie I. D. Campbell.  Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[45]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Calibrating the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[46]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[47]  Chaitanya Ramineni,et al.  Predicting First–Grade Math Achievement from Developmental Number Sense Trajectories , 2007 .

[48]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[50]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[51]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[52]  R. Glaser.  Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[53]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Development of numerical estimation in young children. , 2004, Child development.

[54]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Visuospatial priming of the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[55]  Ann Dowker,et al.  The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise , 2003 .

[56]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins , 2001, Cognition.

[57]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction , 2007, Nature.

[58]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition , 1993 .

[59]  Geetha B. Ramani,et al.  Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children's numerical development. , 2008, Developmental science.