The Marginal Cost Of Railway Track Renewals: A Sample Selection Modelling Approach

Economic theory advocates marginal cost pricing for efficient utilisation of transport infrastructure. A growing body of literature has emerged on the issue of marginal infrastructure wear and tear costs, but the majority of the work is focused on costs for infrastructure maintenance. Railway track renewals are a substantial part of an infrastructure manager’s budget, but in disaggregated statistical analyses, they cause problems for traditional regression models since there is a piling up of values of the dependent variable at zero. Previous econometric work has sought to circumvent the problem by aggregation in some way. In this paper we work with disaggregate (track-section) data, including the zero observations, but apply censored and sample selection regression models to overcome the bias that would result from estimation using OLS. We derive track renewal cost elasticities with respect to traffic volumes and in turn marginal renewal costs using Swedish railway renewal data over the period 1999 to 2009. Our paper is the first paper in the literature that we are aware of to report usage elasticities specifically for renewal costs and therefore adds important new evidence to the previous literature where there is a paucity of studies on renewals and considerable uncertainty over the effects of rail traffic on renewal costs. In the Swedish context, we find that the inclusion of marginal track renewal costs in the track access pricing regime, which currently only reflects marginal maintenance costs, would add substantially to the existing track access charge.

[1]  William J. Burke,et al.  Fitting and Interpreting Cragg's Tobit Alternative using Stata , 2009 .

[2]  Phill Wheat,et al.  CATRIN (Cost Allocation of TRansport INfrastructure cost), Deliverable 8 - Rail Cost Allocation for Europe , 2009 .

[3]  Mats Andersson,et al.  Fixed Effects Estimation of Marginal Railway Infrastructure Costs in Sweden , 2007 .

[4]  Chris Nash,et al.  Rail Infrastructure Charges in Europe , 2005 .

[5]  W. Greene,et al.  Censored Data and Truncated Distributions , 2005 .

[6]  J Thomas,et al.  EU TASK FORCE ON RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGING. SUMMARY FINDINGS ON BEST PRACTICE IN MARGINAL COST PRICING , 2003 .

[7]  Edward C. Norton,et al.  Choosing Between and Interpreting the Heckit and Two-Part Models for Corner Solutions , 2003, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[8]  C. Nash,et al.  Pricing European Transport Systems Recent Developments and Evidence from Case Studies , 2001 .

[9]  Shihti Yu,et al.  On the choice between sample selection and two-part models , 1996 .

[10]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  A Test of the Tobit Specification against an Alternative Suggested by Cragg , 1984 .

[11]  J. G. Cragg Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods , 1971 .

[12]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Microeconometrics Using Stata , 2009 .

[13]  A. Smith,et al.  INTERNATIONAL BENCHMARKING OF NETWORK RAIL'S MAINTENANCE AND RENEWAL COSTS: AN ECONOMETRIC STUDY BASED ON THE LICB DATASET (1996-2006) Report for the Office of Rail Regulation , 2008 .

[14]  Philip Walker,et al.  Annex 1B. Track maintenance and renewal costs in Switzerland , 2008 .

[15]  Mats Andersson,et al.  Marginal Railway Renewal Costs: A Survival Data Approach , 2007 .

[16]  Mats Andersson,et al.  Marginal Cost Pricing of Railway Infrastructure Operation, Maintenance and Renewal in Sweden: From Policy to Practice Through Existing Data , 2006 .

[17]  Chris Nash,et al.  Measuring the marginal social cost of transport , 2005 .

[18]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[19]  Tx Station Stata Statistical Software: Release 7. , 2001 .

[20]  Lnec Dtu,et al.  Final Report for Publication , 1999 .

[21]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[22]  J. Tobin Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables , 1958 .