Proton Discharge on a Gold Electrode from Triethylammonium in Acetonitrile: Theoretical Modeling of Potential-Dependent Kinetic Isotope Effects.

The discharge of protons on electrode surfaces, known as the Volmer reaction, is a ubiquitous reaction in heterogeneous electrocatalysis and plays an important role in renewable energy technologies. Recent experiments with triethylammonium (TEAH+) donating the proton to a gold electrode in acetonitrile demonstrate significantly different Tafel slopes for TEAH+ and its deuterated counterpart, TEAD+. As a result, the kinetic isotope effect (KIE) for the hydrogen evolution reaction changes considerably as a function of applied potential. Herein a vibronically nonadiabatic approach for proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) at an electrode interface is extended to heterogeneous electrochemical processes and is applied to this system. This approach accounts for the key effects of the electrical double layer and spans the electronically adiabatic and nonadiabatic regimes, as found to be necessary for this reaction. The experimental Tafel plots for TEAH+ and TEAD+ are reproduced using physically reasonable parameters within this model. The potential-dependent KIE or, equivalently, isotope-dependent Tafel slope is found to be a consequence of contributions from excited electron-proton vibronic states that depend on both isotope and applied potential. Specifically, the contributions from excited reactant vibronic states are greater for TEAD+ than for TEAH+. Thus, the two reactions proceed by the same fundamental mechanism yet exhibit significantly different Tafel slopes. This theoretical approach may be applicable to a wide range of other heterogeneous electrochemical PCET reactions.

[1]  Kari Laasonen,et al.  Diabatic model for electrochemical hydrogen evolution based on constrained DFT configuration interaction. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[2]  A. Peterson,et al.  Controlled-Potential Simulation of Elementary Electrochemical Reactions: Proton Discharge on Metal Surfaces , 2018, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

[3]  Y. Surendranath,et al.  Donor-Dependent Kinetics of Interfacial Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  Leif Hammarström,et al.  Accumulative charge separation for solar fuels production: coupling light-induced single electron transfer to multielectron catalysis. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.

[5]  Marc T. M. Koper,et al.  Theory of multiple proton–electron transfer reactions and its implications for electrocatalysis , 2013 .

[6]  Aleš Iglič,et al.  Decrease of permittivity of an electrolyte solution near a charged surface due to saturation and excluded volume effects. , 2012, Bioelectrochemistry.

[7]  Samantha Horvath,et al.  Insights into proton-coupled electron transfer mechanisms of electrocatalytic H2 oxidation and production , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  L. Krishtalik,et al.  Kinetics of the hydrogen evolution reaction on gold electrode. A new case of the barrierless discharge , 2011 .

[9]  Aleš Iglič,et al.  Generalized stern models of the electric double layer considering the spatial variation of permittvity and finite size of ions in saturation regime , 2011, Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters.

[10]  Sharon Hammes-Schiffer,et al.  Theoretical analysis of proton relays in electrochemical proton-coupled electron transfer. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  Sharon Hammes-Schiffer,et al.  Proton-coupled electron transfer versus hydrogen atom transfer: generation of charge-localized diabatic states. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[12]  S. Hammes-Schiffer,et al.  Theory of coupled electron and proton transfer reactions. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[13]  Ales Iglic,et al.  Excluded volume effect and orientational ordering near charged surface in solution of ions and Langevin dipoles. , 2010, Bioelectrochemistry.

[14]  D. Nocera Chemistry of personalized solar energy. , 2009, Inorganic chemistry.

[15]  Sharon Hammes-Schiffer,et al.  Proton-coupled electron transfer in solution, proteins, and electrochemistry. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[16]  A. Soudackov,et al.  Theoretical Formulation of Nonadiabatic Electrochemical Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer at Metal−Solution Interfaces , 2008 .

[17]  A. Soudackov,et al.  Model system-bath Hamiltonian and nonadiabatic rate constants for proton-coupled electron transfer at electrode-solution interfaces. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  Yoshitada Morikawa,et al.  Structure of the water/platinum interface--a first principles simulation under bias potential. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[19]  A. Paul,et al.  Proton-coupled electron transfer. , 2012, Chemical reviews.

[20]  J. Grimminger,et al.  Dynamics of combined electron- and proton transfer at metal electrodes , 2007 .

[21]  Sharon Hammes-Schiffer,et al.  Calculation of vibronic couplings for phenoxyl/phenol and benzyl/toluene self-exchange reactions: implications for proton-coupled electron transfer mechanisms. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  M. Koper,et al.  A model for bond-breaking electron transfer at metal electrodes , 2006 .

[23]  J. Grimminger,et al.  A model for combined electron and proton transfer in electrochemical systems , 2005 .

[24]  Thomas Bligaard,et al.  Trends in the exchange current for hydrogen evolution , 2005 .

[25]  J. Hynes,et al.  Adiabatic and nonadiabatic proton transfer rate constants in solution , 2004 .

[26]  A. Stuchebrukhov,et al.  Concerted electron and proton transfer: Transition from nonadiabatic to adiabatic proton tunneling , 2000 .

[27]  A. Soudackov,et al.  Derivation of rate expressions for nonadiabatic proton-coupled electron transfer reactions in solution , 2000 .

[28]  A. Soudackov,et al.  Multistate continuum theory for multiple charge transfer reactions in solution , 1999 .

[29]  M. Newton,et al.  Calculation of electronic coupling matrix elements for ground and excited state electron transfer reactions: Comparison of the generalized Mulliken-Hush and block diagonalization methods , 1997 .

[30]  Sangyoub Lee,et al.  A DYNAMICAL THEORY OF NONADIABATIC PROTON AND HYDROGEN ATOM TRANSFER REACTION RATES IN SOLUTION , 1989 .

[31]  M. Newton,et al.  Electron Transfer Reactions in Condensed Phases , 1985 .

[32]  Sharon Hammes-Schiffer,et al.  Quantum and dynamical effects of proton donor-acceptor vibrational motion in nonadiabatic proton-coupled electron transfer reactions. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  L. Krishtalik Proton transfer in electrode reactions. Experimental test of two theoretical models , 1982 .