Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Construct Validation: An Empirical Review

This study investigated the psychological assessment literature to determine what applied researchers are using and reporting from confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) studies for evidence of construct validation. One hundred and one articles published in four major psychological assessment journals between 1990 and 2002 were systematically reviewed. Information from each article was collected across four broad areas: Background, Data Screening, Reporting Results, and Discussing Results. Temporal trends were assessed with point-biserial correlations to determine how practices have changed over time. From the review, several recommendations were provided to assist assessment researchers report validity evidence from CFA studies.

[1]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[2]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies , 1995 .

[3]  D. Kaplan.  Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions , 2000 .

[4]  B. Muthén.  A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators , 1984 .

[5]  Fadia Nasser,et al.  On the Use of Factor Analysis as a Research Tool. , 1998 .

[6]  B. Thompson,et al.  Factor Analytic Evidence for the Construct Validity of Scores: A Historical Overview and Some Guidelines , 1996 .

[7]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[8]  Jeri Benson,et al.  Developing a Strong Program of Construct Validation: A Test Anxiety Example , 2005 .

[9]  Christine DiStefano,et al.  The Impact of Categorization With Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2002 .

[10]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[11]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling , 2000 .

[12]  M. Browne.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[13]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  A. Panter,et al.  Writing about structural equation models. , 1995 .

[15]  D. Russell.  In Search of Underlying Dimensions: The Use (and Abuse) of Factor Analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 2002 .

[16]  H W Marsh,et al.  Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[17]  Tron Foss,et al.  The Performance of ML, GLS, and WLS Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling Under Conditions of Misspecification and Nonnormality , 2000 .

[18]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[19]  S. Finney,et al.  Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling , 2001 .

[20]  B. Muthén,et al.  A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables , 1985 .

[21]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A First Course in Factor Analysis 2nd Ed , 1973 .

[22]  A. Satorra,et al.  Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. , 1994 .

[23]  S. Breckler.  Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: cause for concern? , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  F. Floyd,et al.  Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. , 1995 .

[25]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of causal models in marketing research: A review , 1996 .

[26]  B. Byrne.  Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .