An Action Principle for Biological Systems

In the analysis of physical systems, the forces and mechanics of all system changes as codified in the Newtonian laws can be redefined by the methods of Lagrange and Hamilton through an identification of the governing action principle as a more general framework for dynamics. For the living system, it is the dimensional and relational structure of its biologic continuum (both internal and external to the organism) that creates the signature informational metrics and course configurations for the action dynamics associated with any natural systems phenomena. From this dynamic information theoretic framework, an action functional can be also derived in accordance with the methods of Lagrange. The experiential process of acquiring information and translating it into actionable meaning for adaptive responses is the driving force for changes in the living system. The core axiomatic procedure of this adaptive process should include an innate action principle that can determine the system’s directional changes. This procedure for adaptive system reconciliation of divergences from steady state within the biocontinuum can be described by an information metric formulation of the process for actionable knowledge acquisition that incorporates the axiomatic inference of the Kullback’s Principle of Minimum Discrimination Information powered by the mechanics of survival replicator dynamics. This entropic driven trajectory naturally minimizes the biocontinuum information gradient differences like a least action principle and is an inference procedure for directional change. If the mathematical expression of this process is the Lagrangian integrand for adaptive changes within the biocontinuum, then it is also considered as an action functional for the living system.

[1]  C. Gray The Lazy Universe: An Introduction to the Principle of Least Action , 2018 .

[2]  John C. Baez,et al.  Relative Entropy in Biological Systems , 2015, Entropy.

[3]  A. Caticha The basics of information geometry , 2014, 1412.5633.

[4]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  Marc Harper,et al.  The Replicator Equation as an Inference Dynamic , 2009, ArXiv.

[6]  Marc Harper,et al.  Information Geometry and Evolutionary Game Theory , 2009, ArXiv.

[7]  G. Karev Replicator Equations and the Principle of Minimal Production of Information , 2009, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[8]  Carlo Cafaro,et al.  The Information Geometry of Chaos , 2008, 1601.07935.

[9]  Gregory B. Newby,et al.  Cognitive space and information space , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Ariel Caticha,et al.  Entropic Dynamics , 2001, Entropy.

[11]  J. Wheeler Information, physics, quantum: the search for links , 1999 .

[12]  S. Amari,et al.  Gradient systems in view of information geometry , 1995 .

[13]  Mae-Wan Ho,et al.  The Rainbow and the Worm:The Physics of Organisms , 1993 .

[14]  R. Johnson,et al.  Properties of cross-entropy minimization , 1981, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[16]  Evgueni A. Haroutunian,et al.  Information Theory and Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[17]  V. Astakhov Methods of information geometry in computational system biology (consistency between chemical and biological evolution). , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[18]  渡邊 澄夫,et al.  Algebraic geometry and statistical learning theory , 2009 .

[19]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[20]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Methods of information geometry , 2000 .

[21]  E. T. Jaynes,et al.  Papers on probability, statistics and statistical physics , 1983 .

[22]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .