Why Some Humanoid Faces Are Perceived More Positively Than Others: Effects of Human-Likeness and Task

Ample research in social psychology has highlighted the importance of the human face in human–human interactions. However, there is a less clear understanding of how a humanoid robot’s face is perceived by humans. One of the primary goals of this study was to investigate how initial perceptions of robots are influenced by the extent of human-likeness of the robot’s face, particularly when the robot is intended to provide assistance with tasks in the home that are traditionally carried out by humans. Moreover, although robots have the potential to help both younger and older adults, there is limited knowledge of whether the two age groups’ perceptions differ. In this study, younger ($$N=32$$N=32) and older adults ($$N=32$$N=32) imagined interacting with a robot in four different task contexts and rated robot faces of varying levels of human-likeness. Participants were also interviewed to assess their reasons for particular preferences. This multi-method approach identified patterns of perceptions across different appearances as well as reasons that influence the formation of such perceptions. Overall, the results indicated that people’s perceptions of robot faces vary as a function of robot human-likeness. People tended to over-generalize their understanding of humans to build expectations about a human-looking robot’s behavior and capabilities. Additionally, preferences for humanoid robots depended on the task although younger and older adults differed in their preferences for certain humanoid appearances. The results of this study have implications both for advancing theoretical understanding of robot perceptions and for creating and applying guidelines for the design of robots.

[1]  Maya B. Mathur,et al.  An uncanny game of trust: Social trustworthiness of robots inferred from subtle anthropomorphic facial cues , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[4]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  The domesticated robot: Design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Retirement home staff and residents' preferences for healthcare robots , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[6]  Jaume Masip,et al.  Facial appearance and impressions of ‘credibility’: The effects of facial babyishness and age on person perception , 2004 .

[7]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance Matters. , 2008, Social and personality psychology compass.

[8]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[9]  Guy L. Lacroix,et al.  Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Younger and Older Adults’ Attitudes Toward Robot Faces , 2013 .

[11]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Older adults' medication management in the home: How can robots help? , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research , 2006 .

[14]  H. Weiss,et al.  Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. , 1996 .

[15]  R. Riggio,et al.  Beauty is More Than Skin Deep: Components of Attractiveness , 1991 .

[16]  Akanksha Prakash Understanding younger and older adults' perceptions of humanoid robots: effects of facial appearance and task , 2013 .

[17]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[18]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Understanding the Potential for Robot Assistance for Older Adults in the Home Environment , 2011 .

[19]  S. Brownlow,et al.  Seeing is believing: Facial appearance, credibility, and attitude change , 1992 .

[20]  M. Heilman,et al.  Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[22]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Crossing the 'uncanny valley': adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. , 2010, Perception.

[23]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[24]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Is a robot an appliance, teammate, or friend? age-related differences in expectations of and attitudes towards personal home-based robots , 2008 .

[25]  K. MacDorman,et al.  Subjective Ratings of Robot Video Clips for Human Likeness, Familiarity, and Eeriness: An Exploration of the Uncanny Valley , 2006 .

[26]  B. MacDonald,et al.  Attitudes towards health‐care robots in a retirement village , 2012, Australasian journal on ageing.

[27]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[28]  M. Walters The Design Space for Robot Appearance and Behaviour for Social Robot Companions , 2008 .

[29]  Tom Geller,et al.  Overcoming the Uncanny Valley , 2008, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[30]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Measurement of Anxiety toward Robots , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[31]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[32]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage , 1992 .

[33]  A. Todorov,et al.  Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes , 2005, Science.

[34]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  My robotic doppelgänger - a critical look at the Uncanny Valley , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[35]  David Lee,et al.  The art of designing robot faces: dimensions for human-robot interaction , 2006, HRI '06.

[36]  Lawton Mp Aging and performance of home tasks. , 1990 .

[37]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[38]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches , 2004 .

[39]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[40]  J. Trafton,et al.  The Perception of Humanness from the Movements of Synthetic Agents , 2011, Perception.

[41]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[42]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Evaluating the effects of behavioral realism in embodied agents , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Functional Limitations to Daily Living Tasks in the Aged: A Focus Group Analysis , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[44]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Sensitivity to “Bad Genes” and the Anomalous Face Overgeneralization Effect: Cue Validity, Cue Utilization, and Accuracy in Judging Intelligence and Health , 2004 .

[45]  Sven Wachsmuth,et al.  What can I do for you? Appearance and Application of Robots , 2007 .

[46]  Andrew Olney,et al.  Upending the Uncanny Valley , 2005, AAAI.

[47]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[48]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[49]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[50]  Britta Wrede,et al.  Effects of visual appearance on the attribution of applications in social robotics , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[51]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[52]  M. Bar,et al.  Very first impressions. , 2006, Emotion.

[53]  T. Kanda,et al.  Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots , 2006 .

[54]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[55]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[56]  Yifan Wang,et al.  Exploring the Uncanny Valley with Japanese Video Game Characters , 2007, DiGRA Conference.

[57]  L GoodhueDale,et al.  Task-technology fit and individual performance , 1995 .

[58]  M. Lawton Aging and Performance of Home Tasks , 1990, Human factors.

[59]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[60]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  How design characteristics of robots determine evaluation and uncanny valley related responses , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[61]  Arthur P. Brief,et al.  Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews , 2003 .

[62]  T. Kanda,et al.  Psychology in human-robot communication: an attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[63]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[64]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[66]  Ya-Huei Wu,et al.  Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. , 2012, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.