Russian housing finance policy: state-led institutional evolution

A public policy scholar sets out to investigate the reasons behind the exceptionally high interest rates for mortgage loans in Russia. The article argues that this situation can be explained by examining Russian government policy making in the area of housing finance during the post-Soviet period. Following comparative literature, the process of policy development over time is argued to be determined by the interaction of such factors as policy legacies, policy ideas, institutional environment and actors' interests. The article demonstrates how the agency model of housing finance was institutionalised in policy during the 1990s. The initial appeal of this model to the interest of diverse actors at different levels of government is explained. The subsequent evolution of this model towards the formation of a ‘state-led model of housing finance’ over the recent decade is traced and its limitations in producing sufficient volumes of mortgage funding are highlighted. The analysis, in addition, demonstrates that alternative policy ideas with the potential to generate extra volumes of mortgage finance are also available in Russia within the relevant policy community. Their adoption in policy is, however, presently blocked by the interests of the top policy officials seeking to increase and maintain the central role of the Russian state in directing the country's economy.

[1]  K. Scanlon,et al.  International trends in housing tenure and mortgage finance , 2004 .

[2]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Debating the Role of Institutions in Political and Economic Development: Theory, History, and Findings* , 2008 .

[3]  R. Struyk Restructuring Russia's Housing Sector: 1991-1997 , 1997 .

[4]  James Mahoney,et al.  Explaining Institutional Change: Explaining Institutional Change , 2009 .

[5]  Zuzana Fungáčová,et al.  Bank Liquidity Creation in Russia , 2012 .

[6]  R. Connolly,et al.  Russia’s Accession to the World Trade Organization , 2012 .

[7]  M. Hansen Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State , 2000 .

[8]  Abel Gezevich Aganbegi︠a︡n Inside Perestroika: The Future of the Soviet Economy , 1989 .

[9]  J. Zavisca Property without Markets: Housing Policy and Politics in Post-Soviet Russia, 1992–2007 , 2008 .

[10]  David P. Lane Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Former State Socialist Societies , 2005 .

[11]  R. Sakwa,et al.  Developments in Russian Politics 8 , 2005 .

[12]  G. Andrusz Housing and urban development in the USSR , 1984 .

[13]  R. Sakwa The Quality of Freedom , 2009 .

[14]  A. Vernikov The Impact of State-Controlled Banks on the Russian Banking Sector , 2012 .

[15]  R. Struyk Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case of Housing , 1996 .

[16]  R. Rosen Too Much Right can Make a Wrong: Setting the Stage for the Financial Crisis , 2009 .

[17]  Francie Ostrower THE URBAN INSTITUTE , 2004 .

[18]  P. Hall Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[19]  J. Mahoney,et al.  A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change , 2010 .

[20]  Colin Elman,et al.  Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods , 2006 .

[21]  Nadejda Victor,et al.  Oil and Governance: Gazprom: the struggle for power , 2011 .

[22]  L. Shevtsova Reading Russia: The Return of Personalized Power , 2009 .

[23]  P. Rutland Putin's Economic Record: Is the Oil Boom Sustainable? , 2008 .

[24]  L. Salamon,et al.  The tools of government : a guide to the new governance , 2002 .

[25]  R. Ericson The Russian Economy in 2008: Testing the "Market Economy" , 2009 .

[26]  V. Gel’man Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy , 2008 .

[27]  P. Hall,et al.  Institutional change in varieties of capitalism , 2008 .

[28]  N. Robinson August 1998 and the development of Russia's post-communist political economy , 2009 .

[29]  Населением И Жильем The relationship between population and housing , 2008 .

[30]  Petr Sunega,et al.  The future of housing systems after the transition – The case of the Czech Republic , 2010 .

[31]  David G. Victor,et al.  Oil and Governance: State-Owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply , 2011 .

[32]  R. Sakwa The quality of freedom : Khodorkovsky, Putin, and the Yukos affair , 2009 .

[33]  R. Connolly Financial Constraints on the Modernization of the Russian Economy , 2011 .

[34]  Eugene Huskey Pantouflage à la russe: The Recruitment of Russian Political and Business Elites , 2010 .

[35]  K. Thelen Historical Institutionalism in comparative politics , 1997 .

[36]  N. Kosareva Russia: Fast Starter: Housing Sector Reform 1991-1995 , 1995 .

[37]  David A. Rochefort,et al.  Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. By Howlett Michael and Ramesh M.. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1995. 239p. $28.00. , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[38]  L. Solanko,et al.  The Role of Banks in Monetary Policy Transmission: Empirical Evidence from Russia , 2009 .

[39]  English Only Economic Commission for Europe , 2012 .

[40]  R. Struyk,et al.  Housing Policy in the United States , 1992 .

[41]  D. Reiss Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Creatures of Regulatory Privilege , 2010 .

[42]  H. Pemberton,et al.  Learning and Change in 20th-Century British Economic Policy , 2004 .

[43]  K. Thelen Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: HOW INSTITUTIONS EVOLVE , 2003 .

[44]  K. Thelen How Institutions Evolve: Contents , 2004 .

[45]  Susanne A. Wengle,et al.  The monetisation of l'goty: Changing patterns of welfare politics and provision in Russia , 2008 .

[46]  A. Pravda Leading Russia: Putin in Perspective: Essays in Honour of Archie Brown , 2005 .

[47]  L. Attwood Privatisation of Housing in Post-Soviet Russia: A New Understanding of Home? , 2012 .