RFI Mitigation in Microwave Radiometry Using Wavelets

The performance of microwave radiometers can be seriously degraded by the presence of radio-frequency interference (RFI). Spurious signals and harmonics from lower frequency bands, spread-spectrum signals overlapping the “protected” band of operation, or out-of-band emissions not properly rejected by the pre-detection filters due to the finite rejection modify the detected power and the estimated antenna temperature from which the geophysical parameters will be retrieved. In recent years, techniques to detect the presence of RFI have been developed. They include time- and/or frequency domain analyses, or statistical analysis of the received signal which, in the absence of RFI, must be a zero-mean Gaussian process. Current mitigation techniques are mostly based on blanking in the time and/or frequency domains where RFI has been detected. However, in some geographical areas, RFI is so persistent in time that is not possible to acquire RFI-free radiometric data. In other applications such as sea surface salinity retrieval, where the sensitivity of the brightness temperature to salinity is weak, small amounts of RFI are also very difficult to detect and mitigate. In this work a wavelet-based technique is proposed to mitigate RFI (cancel RFI as much as possible). The interfering signal is estimated by using the powerful denoising capabilities of the wavelet transform. The estimated RFI signal is then subtracted from the received signal and a “cleaned” noise signal is obtained, from which the power is estimated later. The algorithm performance as a function of the threshold type, and the threshold selection method, the decomposition level, the wavelet type and the interferenceto-noise ratio is presented. Computational requirements are evaluated in terms of quantization levels, number of operations, memory requirements (sequence length). Even though they are high for today’s technology, the algorithms presented can be applied to recorded data. The results show that even RFI much larger than the noise signal can be very effectively mitigated, well below the noise level.

[1]  Roger D. De Roo,et al.  Sensitivity of the Kurtosis Statistic as a Detector of Pulsed Sinusoidal RFI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Sidharth Misra,et al.  RFI detection and mitigation for microwave radiometry with an agile digital detector , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Werner Wiesbeck,et al.  Interference from 24-GHz automotive radars to passive microwave earth remote sensing satellites , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Jeffrey Piepmeier,et al.  A Double Detector for RFI Mitigation in Microwave Radiometers , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  Design of an L-band microwave radiometer with active mitigation of interference , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[6]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  Time and Frequency Blanking for Radio-Frequency Interference Mitigation in Microwave Radiometry , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Moawad I. Dessouky,et al.  Comparison between Haar and Daubechies Wavelet Transformations on FPGA Technology , 2007 .

[8]  C. Sidney Burrus,et al.  Nonlinear processing of a shift-invariant discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for noise reduction , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[9]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Improved wavelet denoising via empirical Wiener filtering , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[10]  H. L. Resnikoff,et al.  Wavelet analysis: the scalable structure of information , 1998 .

[11]  Jean-Michel Poggi,et al.  Wavelet Toolbox User s Guide , 1996 .

[12]  James S. Walker,et al.  A Primer on Wavelets and Their Scientific Applications , 1999 .

[13]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  Performance Study of Algorithms for Detecting Pulsed Sinusoidal Interference in Microwave Radiometry , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[15]  A. Camps,et al.  The impact of the number of bits in digital beamforming real aperture and synthetic aperture radiometers , 2008, 2008 Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment.

[16]  Roger D. De Roo,et al.  Effectiveness of the Sixth Moment to Eliminate a Kurtosis Blind Spot in the Detection of Interference in a Radiometer , 2008, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[17]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  A polarimetric survey of radio-frequency interference in C- and X-bands in the continental united states using WindSat radiometry , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  W. Baan,et al.  RFI mitigation methods in radio astronomy , 2001 .

[20]  Sidharth Misra,et al.  Detection of Radio Frequency Interference with the Aquarius Radiometer , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[21]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  Airborne radio-frequency interference studies at C-band using a digital receiver , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Li Li,et al.  Global survey and statistics of radio-frequency interference in AMSR-E land observations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  David Middleton,et al.  Non-Gaussian Noise Models in Signal Processing for Telecommunications: New Methods and Results for Class A and Class B Noise Models , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.