Inter-signal interaction and uncertain information in anuran multimodal signals
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Ryan,et al. Female and male behavioral response to advertisement calls of graded complexity in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[2] Michael J. Ryan,et al. The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[3] Joshua J. Schwartz. Male calling behavior, female discrimination and acoustic interference in the Neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala under realistic acoustic conditions , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[4] Visual Signaling in Anuran Amphibians , 2004 .
[5] R. D. Semlitsch,et al. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.
[6] D. Papaj,et al. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[7] Ryan C. Taylor,et al. Faux frogs: multimodal signalling and the value of robotics in animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[8] M. Ryan,et al. Acoustic preferences and localization performance of blood-sucking flies (Corethrella Coquillett) to túngara frog calls , 2006 .
[9] E. Hebets. Attention-altering Signal Interactions in the Multimodal Courtship Display of the Wolf Spider Schizocosa Uetzi , 2004 .
[10] E. Hebets. Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991. , 2008, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.
[11] E. C. Cherry. Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .
[12] Sasha R. X. Dall,et al. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[13] P. Marler,et al. Communication Goes Multimodal , 1999, Science.
[14] K. Pfennig,et al. Looking on the bright side: females prefer coloration indicative of male size and condition in the sexually dichromatic spadefoot toad, Scaphiopus couchii , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[15] M. Ryan,et al. The Effects of Spatially Separated Call Components on Phonotaxis in Túngara Frogs: Evidence for Auditory Grouping , 2002, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.
[16] Sang Joon Kim,et al. A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .
[17] M. Ryan,et al. Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state in Physalaemus pustulosus females , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[18] W. Hödl,et al. Colour, size and movement as visual subcomponents in multimodal communication by the frog Allobates femoralis , 2010, Animal Behaviour.
[19] M. Théry,et al. Hearing is not necessarily believing in nocturnal anurans , 2010, Biology Letters.
[20] Ryan C. Taylor,et al. Sexual selection in the squirrel treefrog Hyla squirella: the role of multimodal cue assessment in female choice , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[21] V. Framenau,et al. A REVIEW OF LEG ORNAMENTATION IN MALE WOLF SPIDERS, WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES FROM AUSTRALIA, ARTORIA SCHIZOCOIDES (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) , 2007 .
[22] A. Baierl,et al. Chin up: are the bright throats of male common frogs a condition-independent visual cue? , 2010, Animal Behaviour.
[23] D. H. Owings,et al. Ground squirrels use an infrared signal to deter rattlesnake predation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[24] M. Ryan,et al. Oxygen Consumption during Resting, Calling, and Nest Building in the Frog Physalaemus Pustulosus , 1982, Physiological Zoology.
[25] N. Tinbergen,et al. The Study of Instinct , 1953 .
[26] M. Ryan. The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication , 1986 .
[27] P. Narins,et al. Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[28] Rufus A. Johnstone,et al. Multiple Displays in Animal Communication:`Backup Signals' and `Multiple Messages' , 1996 .
[29] M. Ryan,et al. Animal communication: Complex call production in the túngara frog , 2006, Nature.
[30] T. Hetherington,et al. Field Studies on Visual and Acoustic Signaling in the "Earless" Panamanian Golden Frog, Atelopus zeteki , 1996 .
[31] M. A. Bee,et al. The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[32] Sarah R Partan,et al. Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals , 2005, The American Naturalist.
[33] D. Blumstein. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .
[34] M. Ryan,et al. What do animal signals mean? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.
[35] W. H. Sumby,et al. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .
[36] Georg M. Klump,et al. Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: A limitation on mate choice , 1988, Animal Behaviour.
[37] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Female mate choice in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[38] M. Cummings. SENSORY TRADE-OFFS PREDICT SIGNAL DIVERGENCE IN SURFPERCH , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[39] William Rowan,et al. The Study of Instinct , 1953 .
[40] K. Summers,et al. Visual mate choice in poison frogs , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[41] Amots Zehavi,et al. The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle , 1997 .
[42] W. Hödl,et al. VISUAL SIGNALING IN PHRYNOBATRACHUS KREFFTII BOULENGER, 1909 (ANURA: RANIDAE) , 2006 .
[43] F. Trillmich,et al. The mating systems of pinnipeds and marine iguanas : convergent evolution of polygyny , 1984 .
[44] LORI WOLLERMAN,et al. Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frogHyla ebraccata , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[45] M. Wiener,et al. Animal eyes. , 1957, The American orthoptic journal.
[46] C. Rowe. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[47] H. Brockmann,et al. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems , 2006 .
[48] Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al. Convergent evolution of worker policing by egg eating in the honeybee and common wasp , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[49] Ryan C. Taylor,et al. Multimodal signal variation in space and time: how important is matching a signal with its signaler? , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[50] Timothy F. Wright,et al. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems , 2006 .
[51] W. Hödl,et al. HOW, WHEN, AND WHERE TO PERFORM VISUAL DISPLAYS: THE CASE OF THE AMAZONIAN FROG HYLA PARVICEPS , 2004 .
[52] Christopher G. Murphy. ANURAN COMMUNICATION , 2002, Copeia.
[53] M. Ryan,et al. The Vocal Sac Increases Call Rate in the Túngara Frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 2006, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.
[54] M. Ryan,et al. The vocal sac as a visual cue in anuran communication: an experimental analysis using video playback , 2004, Animal Behaviour.
[55] R R Hoy,et al. The evolutionary convergence of hearing in a parasitoid fly and its cricket host. , 1992, Science.
[56] G. Uetz,et al. Leg ornamentation and the efficacy of courtship display in four species of wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[57] H. McGurk,et al. Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.
[58] M. Morris,et al. Defining Vertical Bars in Relation to Female Preference in the Swordtail Fish Xiphophorus cortezi (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae) , 2001 .