Significance of coil orientation for motor evoked potentials from nasalis muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation

OBJECTIVE In transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, the optimal orientation of the coil on the scalp is dependent on the muscle under investigation, but not yet known for facial muscles. METHODS Using a figure-of-eight coil, we compared TMS induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from eight different coil orientations when recording from ipsi- and contralateral nasalis muscle. RESULTS The MEPs from nasalis muscle revealed three components: The major ipsi- and contra-lateral middle latency responses of approximately 10 ms onset latency proved entirely dependent on voluntary pre-innervation. They were most easily obtained from a coil orientation with posterior inducing current direction, and in this respect resembled the intrinsic hand rather than the masseter muscles. Early short duration responses of around 6 ms onset latency were best elicited with an antero-lateral current direction and not pre-innervation dependent, and therefore most probably due to stimulation of the nerve roots. Late responses (>18 ms) could inconsistently be elicited with posterior coil orientations in pre-innervated condition. CONCLUSIONS By using the appropriate coil orientation and both conditions relaxed and pre-innervated, cortically evoked MEP responses from nasalis muscle can reliably be separated from peripheral and reflex components and also from cross talk of masseter muscle activation.

[1]  S. Boniface,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Brodal,et al.  Neurological Anatomy in Relation to Clinical Medicine , 1950 .

[3]  A. Brodal,et al.  Self-observations and neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  M. Hallett,et al.  Non-invasive differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by mapping of optimal current directions. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  O. Alberti,et al.  Long latency response of the mentalis muscle following transcranial magnetic stimulation with a circular coil in normal subjects , 2000, Neurological research.

[6]  Johannes Mathis,et al.  Motor evoked potentials from masseter muscle induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pyramidal tract: the importance of coil orientation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Marín‐Padilla,et al.  Prenatal and early postnatal ontogenesis of the human motor cortex: a golgi study. I. The sequential development of the cortical layers. , 1970, Brain research.

[8]  M. Hallett,et al.  Optimal Focal Transcranial Magnetic Activation of the Human Motor Cortex: Effects of Coil Orientation, Shape of the Induced Current Pulse, and Stimulus Intensity , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[9]  Magnetically elicited blink reflex: an alternative to conventional electrical stimulation. , 1993, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  B. Meyer,et al.  Beurteilung motorischer Hirnnervenfunktionen mit Hilfe der transkraniellen magnetischen Stimulation , 1988 .

[11]  K. Mills,et al.  Evaluation of proximal facial nerve conduction by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  U. Schmid,et al.  Investigation of facial motor pathways by electrical and magnetic stimulation: sites and mechanisms of excitation. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  Magnetic facial nerve stimulation in normal subjects. Three groups of responses. , 1992, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[14]  R. Laskawi,et al.  Transcranial Cortical Magnetic Stimulation of Lower-Lip Mimetic Muscles: Effect of Coil Position on Motor Evoked Potentials , 1999, ORL.

[15]  A. Ghezzi,et al.  Motor potentials of inferior orbicularis oculi muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Comparison with responses to electrical peripheral stimulation of facial nerve. , 1992, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  A. Berardelli,et al.  Corticobulbar projections to upper and lower facial motoneurons. A study by magnetic transcranial stimulation in man , 1990, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  J. Zidar,et al.  Evidence of direct connection of corticobulbar fibers to orofacial muscles in man: Electromyographic study of individual motor unit responses , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  Motor evoked potentials in orbicularis oris muscle: no evidence of ipsilateral corticonuclear projections. , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  Bl Day,et al.  NEAR THRESHOLD ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC TRANSCRANIAL STIMULI ACTIVATE OVERLAPPING SETS OF CORTICAL-NEURONS IN HUMANS , 1992 .

[20]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Functional organisation of corticonuclear pathways to motoneurones of lower facial muscles in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  K. Murphy,et al.  Motor cortical representation of the diaphragm in man. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  E. Rebeiz,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve , 1991, The Laryngoscope.

[23]  V. Amassian,et al.  Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  A clinical study on the magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve , 1999, The Laryngoscope.

[25]  I. Kanazawa,et al.  Predominant activation of I1-waves from the leg motor area by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, Brain Research.

[26]  A Berardelli,et al.  Cortical mechanisms mediating the inhibitory period after magnetic stimulation of the facial motor area , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[27]  B. Day,et al.  The effect of magnetic coil orientation on the latency of surface EMG and single motor unit responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.