Documenting Stormwater Quality on Texas Highways and Adjacent Vegetated Roadsides

The primary objective of this study is the documentation of stormwater quality of vegetated roadsides of two Texas highways (State Highway 6 in College Station and Loop 360 in Austin), both of which had high average daily traffic. Three sites each in Austin and College Station were monitored using passive “first flush” stormwater samplers for 16 months. Results from this study indicate that significant removal of sediment and heavy metals occurred over the width of vegetated roadsides, but no apparent nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) removal was observed. The results also show that vegetation density has a direct effect on the performance of vegetated roadsides. When roadsides are densely covered with grasses above 90%, significant sediment removal is expected, often within the first 4 m of the edge of pavement. A stepwise regression analysis identifies the antecedent dry period (ADP) as the most significant predictor to pollutant concentration. The pollutant event mean concentration was found to decrease with increasing ADP for all pollutants at the College Station sites, but not the Austin ones.

[1]  Brian W. Mar,et al.  Pollutant Loading Model for Highway Runoff , 1982 .

[2]  Robert J. Kaighn,et al.  TESTING OF ROADSIDE VEGETATION FOR HIGHWAY RUNOFF POLLUTANT REMOVAL , 1996 .

[3]  Michael E. Barrett,et al.  Evaluation of methods for estimating stormwater pollutant loads , 1998 .

[4]  G. A. Irwin,et al.  WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF RUNOFF FROM A RURAL HIGHWAY BRIDGE NEAR TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA , 1978 .

[5]  M. Barrett,et al.  Characterization of Highway Runoff in Austin, Texas, Area , 1998 .

[6]  Kenneth D Kerri,et al.  FORECASTING POLLUTANT LOADS FROM HIGHWAY RUNOFF , 1985 .

[7]  Michael E. Barrett,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF VEGETATIVE CONTROLS FOR TREATING HIGHWAY RUNOFF , 1998 .

[8]  Martin P. Wanielista,et al.  REMOVAL OF HIGHWAY CONTAMINANTS BY ROADSIDE SWALES , 1985 .

[9]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  The highway as a source of water pollution: An appraisal with the heavy metal lead , 1977 .

[10]  Michael E. Barrett,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF HIGHWAY RUNOFF IN THE AUSTIN, TEXAS, AREA , 1996 .

[11]  M. Barrett,et al.  A review and evaluation of literature pertaining to the quantity and control of pollution from highway runoff and construction , 1993 .

[12]  Eric Strecker,et al.  DETERMINING URBAN STORM WATER BMP EFFECTIVENESS , 2001 .

[13]  P. Little,et al.  Emission and deposition of lead from motor exhausts — II. Airborne concentration, particle size and deposition of lead near motorways , 1978 .

[14]  Craig J. Allan,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION AND POLLUTANT LOADING ESTIMATION FOR HIGHWAY RUNOFF , 1998 .

[15]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Sophisticated Stormwater Quality Modeling is Worth the Effort. , 1996 .

[16]  W. J. Dixon,et al.  Processing Data for Outliers , 1953 .

[17]  E W Strecker,et al.  POLLUTANT LOADINGS AND IMPACTS FROM HIGHWAY STORMWATER RUNOFF. VOLUME III: ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION AND RESEARCH REPORT , 1990 .

[18]  R. Harrison,et al.  The chemical composition of highway drainage waters I. Major ions and selected trace metals , 1985 .

[19]  Michael E. Barrett,et al.  Storm Water Pollutant Removal in Roadside Vegetated Buffer Strips , 2004 .

[20]  Michael E. Barrett,et al.  Use of regression models for analyzing highway storm-water loads , 1998 .

[21]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  Removal rates of selected pollutants in the runoff waters from a major rural highway. , 1992 .

[22]  Christopher Zoppou,et al.  Review of urban storm water models , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..