Comparison of MPEG-1 digital videotape with digitized sVHS videotape for quantitative echocardiographic measurements.

Digital format is rapidly emerging as a preferred method for displaying and retrieving echocardiographic studies. The qualitative diagnostic accuracy of Moving Pictures Experts Group (MPEG-1) compressed digital echocardiographic studies has been previously reported. The goals of the present study were to compare quantitative measurements derived from MPEG-1 recordings with the super-VHS (sVHS) videotape clinical standard. Six reviewers performed blinded measurements from still-frame images selected from 20 echocardiographic studies that were simultaneously acquired in sVHS and MPEG-1 formats. Measurements were obtainable in 1401 (95%) of 1486 MPEG-1 variables compared with 1356 (91%) of 1486 sVHS variables (P <.001). Excellent agreement existed between MPEG-1 and sVHS 2-dimensional linear measurements (r = 0.97; MPEG-1 = 0.95[sVHS] + 1.1 mm; P <.001; Delta = 9% +/- 10%), 2-dimensional area measurements (r = 0.89), color jet areas (r = 0.87, p <.001), and Doppler velocities (r = 0.92, p <.001). Interobserver variability was similar for both sVHS and MPEG-1 readings. Our results indicate that quantitative off-line measurements from MPEG-1 digitized echocardiographic studies are feasible and comparable to those obtained from sVHS.

[1]  Richard P. Lewis,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee to Develop Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocard , 1990, Circulation.

[2]  K. Cohn,et al.  Serial Echocardiographic Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Valvular Disease, Including Reproducibility Guidelines for Serial Studies , 1980, Circulation.

[3]  Richard P. Lewis,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardio , 1997, Circulation.

[4]  Joan L. Mitchell,et al.  MPEG Video: Compression Standard , 1996 .

[5]  D. Levy,et al.  Echocardiographic reference values for aortic root size: the Framingham Heart Study. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  D. Levy,et al.  Distribution and categorization of echocardiographic measurements in relation to reference limits: the Framingham Heart Study: formulation of a height- and sex-specific classification and its prospective validation. , 1997, Circulation.

[7]  J D Thomas,et al.  Comparison of MPEG digital video with super VHS tape for diagnostic echocardiographic readings. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[8]  D. Levy,et al.  Left ventricular mass and risk of stroke in an elderly cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. , 1994, JAMA.

[9]  J B Seward,et al.  Guidelines for training in adult cardiovascular medicine. Core Cardiology Training Symposium (COCATS). Task Force 4: training in echocardiography. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  D. Levy,et al.  Heritability of left ventricular mass: the Framingham Heart Study. , 1997, Hypertension.

[11]  G. Gregoratos,et al.  Guidelines for training in adult cardiovascular medicine. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J D Thomas,et al.  Digital storage of echocardiograms offers superior image quality to analog storage, even with 20:1 digital compression: results of the Digital Echo Record Access Study. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[13]  Harvey Feigenbaum,et al.  Practical Approach to a Digital Echocardiographic Laboratory , 1997, Echocardiography.

[14]  J D Thomas,et al.  JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[15]  G Fitch,et al.  A comparison of the interpretation of digitized and videotape recorded echocardiograms. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[16]  C M Otto,et al.  Longitudinal assessment of valvular heart disease by echocardiography. , 1998, Current opinion in cardiology.

[17]  J D Thomas,et al.  Digital formatting standards in medical imaging: a primer for echocardiographers. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.