Nodes, networks, and MUMs: Preserving diversity at all scales

The present focus of practical conservation efforts is limited in scope. This narrowness results in an inability to evaluate and manage phenomena that operate at large spatiotemporal scales. Whereas real ecological phenomena function in a space-time mosaic across a full hierarchy of biological entities and processes, current conservation strategies address a limited spectrum of this complexity. Conservation typically is static (time-limited), concentrates on the habitat content rather than the landscape context of protected areas, evaluates relatively homogeneous communities instead of heterogeneous landscapes, and directs attention to particular species populations and/or the aggregate statistic of species diversity. Insufficient attention has been given to broad ecological patterns and processes and to the conservation of species in natural relative abundance patterns (native diversity).The authors present a conceptual scheme that evaluates not only habitat content within protected areas, but also the landscape context in which each preserve exists. Nodes of concentrated ecological value exist in each landscape at all levels in the biological hierarchy. Integration of these high-quality nodes into a functional network is possible through the establishment of a system of interconnected multiple-use modules (MUMs). The MUM network protects and buffers important ecological entities and phenomena, while encouraging movement of individuals, species, nutrients, energy, and even habitat patches across space and time. An example is presented for the southeastern USA (south Georgia-north Florida), that uses riparian and coastal corridors to interconnect existing protected areas. This scheme will facilitate reintroduction and preservation of wide-ranging species such as the Florida panther, and help reconcile species-level and ecosystem-level conservation approaches.

[1]  G. Merriam,et al.  Patchy environments and species survival: Chipmunks in an agricultural mosaic , 1985 .

[2]  R. Forman,et al.  Patches and Structural Components for A Landscape Ecology , 1981 .

[3]  Frederic E. Clements,et al.  Nature and Structure of the Climax , 1936 .

[4]  D. Sprugel Dynamic structure of wave-regenerated Abies balsamea forests in the north-eastern United States. , 1976 .

[5]  A Koestler,et al.  Ghost in the Machine , 1970 .

[6]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[7]  R. Paine,et al.  Intertidal Landscapes: Disturbance and the Dynamics of Pattern , 1981 .

[8]  P. White,et al.  After preservation: Philisophical and practical problems of change☆ , 1980 .

[9]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Systems ecology : an introduction , 1984 .

[10]  R. Clarke,et al.  Invertebrate diversity on fragmented Calluna-heathland: effects of surrounding vegetation , 1984 .

[11]  T. Garland,et al.  Effects of a Highway on Mojave Desert Rodent Populations , 1984 .

[12]  C. Margules,et al.  Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: A review , 1981 .

[13]  C. Margules,et al.  Modern biogeographic theory: Are there any lessons for nature reserve design? , 1982 .

[14]  H. Mader,et al.  Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields , 1984 .

[15]  L. Hansson Landscape ecology and stability of populations , 1977 .

[16]  J. Kushlan Design and management of continental wildlife reserves: Lessons from the everglades , 1979 .

[17]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves , 1978 .

[18]  R. B. Root Organization of a Plant-Arthropod Association in Simple and Diverse Habitats: The Fauna of Collards (Brassica Oleracea) , 1973 .

[19]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Genetics and Conservation@@@Genetics and Conservation, A Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Populations. , 1985 .

[20]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[21]  N. Hairston Species Abundance and Community Organization , 1959 .

[22]  T. M. Bonnicksen,et al.  Reconstrution of a Presettlement Giant Sequoia‐Mixed Conifer Forest Community Using the Aggregation Approach , 1982 .

[23]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[24]  J. R. Bray,et al.  Gap Phase Replacement in a Maple-Basswood Forest , 1956 .

[25]  Zev Naveh,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY: THEORY AND APPLICATION , 1983, Landscape Journal.

[26]  E. Willis Populations and Local Extinctions of Birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama , 1974 .

[27]  S. McNaughton,et al.  Grazing Lawns: Animals in Herds, Plant Form, and Coevolution , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[28]  W. Cooper,et al.  The Climax Forest of Isle Royale, Lake Superior, and Its Development. I , 1913, Botanical Gazette.

[29]  G. Likens,et al.  Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. , 1979 .

[30]  H. Wright Landscape Development, Forest Fires, and Wilderness Management , 1974, Science.

[31]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes , 1981 .

[32]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  A Regional Landscape Approach to Maintain Diversity , 1983 .

[33]  N. Brokaw,et al.  Earthquake-Caused Landslides: A Major Disturbance to Tropical Forests , 1979, Science.

[34]  P. Dayton Competition, Disturbance, and Community Organization: The Provision and Subsequent Utilization of Space in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 1971 .

[35]  F. Bormann,et al.  Natural disturbance and the steady state in high-altitude balsam fir forests. , 1981, Science.

[36]  W. Sousa Disturbance in Marine Intertidal Boulder Fields: The Nonequilibrium Maintenance of Species Diversity , 1979 .

[37]  T. Lovejoy,et al.  Minimum critical size of ecosystems , 1981 .

[38]  Jared Verner The guild concept applied to management of bird populations , 1984 .

[39]  Jared M. Diamond,et al.  THE ISLAND DILEMMA: LESSONS OF MODERN BIOGEOGRAPHIC STUDIES FOR THE DESIGN OF NATURAL RESERVES , 1975 .

[40]  G. Minshall,et al.  Species Richness in Streams of Different Size from the Same Drainage Basin , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[41]  R. Paine,et al.  Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Wayne P. Sousa,et al.  Intertidal Mosaics: Patch Size, Propagule Availability, and Spatially Variable Patterns of Succession , 1984 .

[43]  Jacques Baudry,et al.  Hedgerows and hedgerow networks in landscape ecology , 1984 .

[44]  S. Levin,et al.  The role of mosaic phenomena in natural communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[45]  J. Diamond,et al.  Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitations. , 1976, Science.

[46]  R. Forman,et al.  Corridors in a landscape their ecological structure and function , 1983 .

[47]  R. Hooper,et al.  Songbird population response to silvicultural practices in central Appalachian hardwoods , 1981 .

[48]  William H. Romme,et al.  Landscape Diversity: The Concept Applied to Yellowstone Park , 1982 .