Varying applicability of four different satellite-derived soil moisture products to global gridded crop model evaluation

Abstract Satellite-derived daily surface soil moisture products have been increasingly available, but their applicability to global gridded crop model (GGCM) evaluation is unclear. This study compares four different soil moisture products with the flux tower site observation at 18 cropland sites across the world where either of maize, soybean, rice and wheat is grown. These products include the first and second versions of Climate Change Initiative Soil Moisture (CCISM-1 and CCISM-2) datasets distributed by the European Space Agency and two different AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer–Earth Observing System)-derived soil moisture datasets, separately provided by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (AMSRE-J) and U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (AMSRE-N). The comparison demonstrates varying reliability of these products in representing major characteristics of temporal pattern of cropland soil moisture by product and crop. Possible reasons for the varying reliability include the differences in sensors, algorithms, bands and criteria used when estimating soil moisture. Both the CCISM-1 and CCISM-2 products appear the most reliable for soybean- and wheat-growing area. However, the percentage of valid data of these products is always lower than other products due to relatively strict criteria when merging data derived from multiple sources, although the CCISM-2 product has much more data with valid retrievals than the CCISM-1 product. The reliability of the AMSRE-J product is the highest for maize- and rice-growing areas and comparable to or slightly lower than the CCISM products for soybean- and wheat-growing areas. The AMSRE-N is the least reliable in most location-crop combinations. The reliability of the products for rice-growing area is far lower than that of other upland crops likely due to the extensive use of irrigation and patch distribution of rice paddy in the area examined here. We conclude that the CCISM-1, CCISM-2 and AMSRE-J products are applicable to GGCM evaluation, while the AMSRE-N product is not. However, we encourage users to integrate these products with in situ soil moisture data especially when GGCMs simulations for rice are evaluated.

[1]  T. Jackson,et al.  L‐band microwave observations over land surface using a two‐dimensional synthetic aperture radiometer , 2006 .

[2]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Error characterisation of global active and passive microwave soil moisture datasets. , 2010 .

[3]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Validation of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer Soil Moisture Products , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  P. Döll,et al.  MIRCA2000—Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high‐resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling , 2010 .

[5]  J. Qin,et al.  Evaluation of AMSR‐E retrievals and GLDAS simulations against observations of a soil moisture network on the central Tibetan Plateau , 2013 .

[6]  C. Müller,et al.  The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0) , 2014 .

[7]  A. Cescatti,et al.  Seasonal trends and environmental controls of methane emissions in a rice paddy field in Northern Italy , 2011 .

[8]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Evaluation of a simple approach for crop evapotranspiration partitioning and analysis of the water budget distribution for several crop species , 2013 .

[9]  Naoto Matsuura,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADVANCED MICROWAVE SCANNING RADIOMETER (AMSR-E) ALGORITHM FOR SOIL MOISTURE AND VEGETATION WATER CONTENT , 2004 .

[10]  W. Wagner,et al.  A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data , 1999 .

[11]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  An assessment of remotely sensed surface and root zone soil moisture through active and passive sensors in northeast Asia , 2015 .

[12]  Keiji Imaoka,et al.  Improvement of the AMSR-E Algorithm for Soil Moisture Estimation by Introducing a Fractional Vegetation Coverage Dataset Derived from MODIS Data , 2009 .

[13]  T. Meyers,et al.  An assessment of storage terms in the surface energy balance of maize and soybean , 2004 .

[14]  W. Wagner,et al.  Fusion of active and passive microwave observations to create an Essential Climate Variable data record on soil moisture , 2012 .

[15]  A. Robock,et al.  The International Soil Moisture Network: a data hosting facility for global in situ soil moisture measurements , 2011 .

[16]  N. Buchmann,et al.  Testing the ability of the DNDC model to predict CO2 and water vapour fluxes of a Swiss cropland site , 2010 .

[17]  K. Taylor Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[18]  James W. Jones,et al.  Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  P. Béziat,et al.  Carbon balance of a three crop succession over two cropland sites in South West France , 2009 .

[20]  E. Njoku,et al.  Vegetation and surface roughness effects on AMSR-E land observations , 2006 .

[21]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Developing an improved soil moisture dataset by blending passive and active microwave satellite-based retrievals , 2011 .

[22]  Jerry Y. Pan,et al.  Intercomparison of MODIS albedo retrievals and in situ measurements across the global FLUXNET network , 2012 .

[23]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  The conversion of the corn/soybean ecosystem to no‐till agriculture may result in a carbon sink , 2005 .

[24]  Pete Smith,et al.  The net biome production of full crop rotations in Europe , 2010 .

[25]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Trend-preserving blending of passive and active microwave soil moisture retrievals , 2012 .

[26]  Karl Schneider,et al.  The carbon budget of a winter wheat field: An eddy covariance analysis of seasonal and inter-annual variability , 2012 .

[27]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Comparing Aircraft-Based Remotely Sensed Energy Balance Fluxes with Eddy Covariance Tower Data Using Heat Flux Source Area Functions , 2005 .

[28]  David P. Billesbach,et al.  Spatiotemporal Variations in Growing Season Exchanges of CO2, H2O, and Sensible Heat in Agricultural Fields of the Southern Great Plains , 2007 .

[29]  W. Wagner,et al.  Evaluation of the ESA CCI soil moisture product using ground-based observations , 2015 .

[30]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  WindSat Global Soil Moisture Retrieval and Validation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Vladimir Romanenkov,et al.  Historical changes in global yields: Major cereal and legume crops from 1982 to 2006 , 2014 .

[32]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000 , 2008 .

[33]  Christian Bernhofer,et al.  Land use regulates carbon budgets in eastern Germany: From NEE to NBP , 2010 .

[34]  Makoto Saito,et al.  Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide exchange in rice paddy field in Japan , 2005 .

[35]  Marc Aubinet,et al.  Annual net ecosystem carbon exchange by a sugar beet crop , 2006 .

[36]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  The SMOS Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[37]  A. Challinor,et al.  Prediction of seasonal climate-induced variations in global food production , 2013 .

[38]  D. Deryng,et al.  Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns. , 2010 .

[39]  W. Wagner,et al.  Soil moisture estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E sensors: An intercomparison and validation study across Europe , 2011 .

[40]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  An Improved Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm for ERS and METOP Scatterometer Observations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[41]  K. Hibbard,et al.  An analysis of soil respiration across northern hemisphere temperate ecosystems , 2005 .

[42]  R. Miller,et al.  Mycorrhizal mediated feedbacks influence net carbon gain and nutrient uptake in Andropogon gerardii. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[43]  W. Wagner,et al.  Soil moisture from operational meteorological satellites , 2007 .

[44]  Ed Hawkins,et al.  Increasing influence of heat stress on French maize yields from the 1960s to the 2030s , 2012, Global change biology.

[45]  J. Zeng,et al.  Evaluation of remotely sensed and reanalysis soil moisture products over the Tibetan Plateau using in-situ observations , 2015 .

[46]  R. Jeu,et al.  Multisensor historical climatology of satellite‐derived global land surface moisture , 2008 .

[47]  Rita Castro,et al.  A First Set of Techniques to Detect Radio Frequency Interferences and Mitigate Their Impact on SMOS Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[48]  Navin Ramankutty,et al.  Trends and Variability in U.S. Corn Yields Over the Twentieth Century , 2005 .

[49]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  Potential and limitations of multidecadal satellite soil moisture observations for selected climate model evaluation studies , 2013 .