On the determinants of Innovation in the European Rehabilitation (Assistive) Technology market

This paper addresses some critical aspects of the Rehabilitation (Assistive) Technology market in Europe which characterise innovation and determine its type and direction. It is argued that innovation in this field is restricted because of (i) the limited and inefficient interaction between the identified seven market elements; (ii) the structural characteristics and general economic environment of the European Rehabilitation Technology market; and (iii) the lack of a concise set of complementary and supportive actions towards the promotion of an environment favourable to industrial innovation and transfer of technologies towards the European Rehabilitation Technology market. The major conclusion from the investigation of the above factors is that innovation is not well served, while the limited innovative activity which is currently observed takes place mainly within institutions or dedicated research departments. Typically this limited amount of innovation originates outside the Rehabilitation Technology market and takes the form of "induced" innovation. The low propensity of RT producers to innovate may be explained by the fact that the present industry is composed by firms which are under financed, thus carrying out limited amount of research and development. On the determinants of Innovation in the European Rehabilitation (Assistive) Technology market N. VERNARDAKIS, C. STEPHANIDIS and D. AKOUMIANAKIS Foundation of Research and Technology Hellas, Institute of Computer Science, P.O Box 1885, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

[1]  P. Drucker The discipline of innovation. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[2]  Matthew Woll,et al.  Standardization , 1928 .

[3]  C. K. Wang,et al.  The management of innovation: strategy, structure, and organizational climate , 1993 .

[4]  Brian R. Bryant,et al.  Assistive Technology , 1998 .

[5]  Paul Geroski,et al.  Innovation and the Sectoral Sources of UK Productivity Growth , 1991 .

[6]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[7]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  Technology strategy and the firm : management and public policy , 1989 .

[8]  R.A. Cooper High-tech wheelchairs gain the competitive edge , 1991, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[9]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation and Small Firms , 1990 .

[10]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation , 1992 .

[11]  C.E. Brubaker Advances in wheelchair technology , 1988, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[12]  Roger Ware,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation: Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature , 1983 .

[13]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation , 1979 .

[14]  Jörg Schaffrina Interrelations of Industrial Design, Ergonomics, and the User , 1991, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[15]  C. M. Sorrill The Strategic Management of Technological Innovation , 1991 .

[16]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Unemployment And Technical Innovation , 1982 .

[17]  Tudor Rickards,et al.  Innovation and the small and medium sized firm: F. Rothwell and W. Zegveld, Frances Pinter, London (1982), 268 pp. £14.75 (hardback) , 1983 .

[18]  B Stenberg The Swedish model of social alarm systems for the care of the elderly. , 1992, Home health care services quarterly.