Evaluating effects of applying different kinetic models to pyrolysis modeling of fiberglass‐reinforced polymer composites

Summary This research evaluates the effects of applying different kinetic models (KMs), developed based on thermal analysis using thermogravimetric analysis data, when used in typical 1D pyrolysis models of fiberglass-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. The effect of different KMs is isolated from the FRP heating by conducting pyrolysis modeling based on measured temperature gradients. Mass loss rate simulations from this pyrolysis modeling with various KMs show changes in the simulations due to applying different KM approaches are minimal in general. Pyrolysis simulations with the most complex KM are conducted at several heat flux levels. Mass loss rate comparison shows there is good overlap between simulations and the experimental data at low incident heat fluxes. Comparison shows there is poor overlap at high incident heat fluxes. These results indicate that increasing complexity of KMs to be used in pyrolysis modeling is unnecessary for these FRP samples and that the basic assumption of considering thermal decomposition of each computational cell in comprehensive pyrolysis modeling as equivalent to that in a thermogravimetric analysis experiment becomes inapplicable at depth and higher heating rates. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  C. Fernandez-Pello,et al.  Generalized pyrolysis model for combustible solids , 2007 .

[2]  Colomba Di Blasi,et al.  Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis , 2008 .

[3]  J. Opfermann,et al.  Kinetic Analysis Using Multivariate Non-linear Regression. I. Basic concepts , 2000 .

[4]  A. Fernandez-Pello,et al.  Application of genetic algorithms and thermogravimetry to determine the kinetics of polyurethane foam in smoldering combustion , 2006 .

[5]  Guillermo Rein,et al.  The application of a genetic algorithm to estimate material properties for fire modeling from bench-scale fire test data , 2006 .

[6]  M. Chaos,et al.  Evaluation of optimization schemes and determination of solid fuel properties for CFD fire models using bench-scale pyrolysis tests , 2011 .

[7]  A. Vázquez,et al.  Thermal degradation and fire resistance of unsaturated polyester, modified acrylic resins and their composites with natural fibres , 2006 .

[8]  James G. Quintiere,et al.  New Concepts for Measuring Flame Spread Properties , 1984 .

[9]  J. Staggs.  Modelling thermal degradation of polymers using single-step first-order kinetics , 1999 .

[10]  S. Vyazovkin.  Chapter 13 - Isoconversional Kinetics , 2008 .

[11]  A. C. Fernandez-Pello,et al.  Optimization Algorithms for Material Pyrolysis Property Estimation , 2011 .

[12]  S. Hwang,et al.  Chemical kinetics and reaction mechanism of thermal decomposition of aluminum hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide at high temperature (973-1123 K) , 1989 .

[13]  T. Ozawa.  A New Method of Analyzing Thermogravimetric Data , 1965 .

[14]  Dimitrios N. Bikiaris,et al.  Thermal degradation kinetics of the biodegradable aliphatic polyester, poly(propylene succinate) , 2006 .

[15]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Fire dynamics simulator (ver-sion 3) technical reference guide , 2001 .

[16]  Alberto Gómez-Barea,et al.  Diffusional effects in CO2 gasification experiments with single biomass char particles. 1. Experimental investigation , 2006 .

[17]  L. Pérez-Maqueda,et al.  Combined kinetic analysis of solid-state reactions: a powerful tool for the simultaneous determination of kinetic parameters and the kinetic model without previous assumptions on the reaction mechanism. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[18]  C. Fernandez-Pello,et al.  A model for the oxidative pyrolysis of wood , 2009 .

[19]  G. Rein,et al.  Relevant model complexity for non-charring polymer pyrolysis , 2013 .

[20]  Sergey Vyazovkin,et al.  A unified approach to kinetic processing of nonisothermal data , 1996 .

[21]  Sergey Vyazovkin,et al.  An approach to the solution of the inverse kinetic problem in the case of complex processes , 1990 .

[22]  Serge Bourbigot,et al.  The Degradation Front Model- A Tool for the Chemical Study of the Degradation of Epoxy Resins in Fire , 1996 .

[23]  Joseph H. Flynn,et al.  A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data , 1966 .

[24]  John L. de Ris,et al.  A sample holder for determining material properties , 2000 .

[25]  Michael A. Delichatsios,et al.  Material Pyrolysis Properties, Part I: An Integral Model for One-Dimensional Transient Pyrolysis of Charring and Non-Charring Materials , 1993 .

[26]  Robert Dale Webster,et al.  Pyrolysis model parameter optimization using a customized stochastic hill-climber algorithm and bench scale fire test data , 2009 .

[27]  Richard E. Lyon,et al.  Two‐dimensional model of burning for pyrolyzable solids , 2014 .

[28]  Alan K. Burnham,et al.  A historical and current perspective on predicting thermal cookoff behavior , 2006 .

[29]  L. J. Lee,et al.  Microstructure formation in the cure of unsaturated polyester resins , 1988 .

[30]  Shih-hsuan Chiu,et al.  A study of the combustion and fire-retardance behaviour of unsaturated polyester/phenolic resin blends , 2000 .

[31]  R. Lyon,et al.  A Simple Method for Determining Kinetic Parameters for Materials in Fire Models , 2011 .

[32]  S. Stoliarov,et al.  Prediction of the burning rates of non-charring polymers , 2009 .

[33]  P. Hornsby.  The application of magnesium hydroxide as a fire retardant and smoke-suppressing additive for polymers , 1994 .

[34]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .